Unpacking and unpicking the challenge of 600 hours of preschool attendance

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Harrison, Tracy Redman, Judith E Brown, Leanne Lavina, B. Davis, S. Degotardi, Loraine Fordham, Fay Hadley, Catherine Jones, Manjula Waniganayake, Sandie Wong
{"title":"Unpacking and unpicking the challenge of 600 hours of preschool attendance","authors":"L. Harrison, Tracy Redman, Judith E Brown, Leanne Lavina, B. Davis, S. Degotardi, Loraine Fordham, Fay Hadley, Catherine Jones, Manjula Waniganayake, Sandie Wong","doi":"10.1177/18369391231219829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian Government’s (2022) Preschool Reform Funding Agreement and initiatives by state governments aim to lift enrolment and maximise the benefits of early childhood education (ECE) in the year before school. The Agreement is particularly relevant for children and families from vulnerable and disadvantaged backgrounds, many of whom do not utilise the annual attendance target of 600 hours available to every child. Children’s enrolment and daily attendance records are key to understanding participation in ECE, but few studies or government reports have examined this information in detail. Drawing on administrative records provided by 19 long day care and preschool centres/schools in areas of socio-economic disadvantage, we analysed weekly attendance for 971 preschool-aged children over four 10-week terms. Results for the ‘percentage of enrolled days’ attended (M = 88%) and ‘total hours’ attended (M = 576 h) approached the target but differed for children enrolled in preschool versus long day care.","PeriodicalId":46779,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391231219829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Australian Government’s (2022) Preschool Reform Funding Agreement and initiatives by state governments aim to lift enrolment and maximise the benefits of early childhood education (ECE) in the year before school. The Agreement is particularly relevant for children and families from vulnerable and disadvantaged backgrounds, many of whom do not utilise the annual attendance target of 600 hours available to every child. Children’s enrolment and daily attendance records are key to understanding participation in ECE, but few studies or government reports have examined this information in detail. Drawing on administrative records provided by 19 long day care and preschool centres/schools in areas of socio-economic disadvantage, we analysed weekly attendance for 971 preschool-aged children over four 10-week terms. Results for the ‘percentage of enrolled days’ attended (M = 88%) and ‘total hours’ attended (M = 576 h) approached the target but differed for children enrolled in preschool versus long day care.
解读 600 小时学前教育的挑战
澳大利亚政府(2022年)学前教育改革资助协议和各州政府的举措旨在提高入学率,并在入学前一年最大限度地提高幼儿教育(ECE)的效益。该协议对来自脆弱和处境不利背景的儿童和家庭尤为重要,他们中的许多人没有利用每个儿童每年600小时的出勤目标。儿童入学和每日出勤记录是了解参与欧洲经委会的关键,但很少有研究或政府报告详细审查了这一信息。根据社会经济劣势地区19个长期日托和学前中心/学校提供的行政记录,我们分析了971名学龄前儿童在四个为期10周的学期中每周的出勤率。“入学日数百分比”(M = 88%)和“总学时”(M = 576小时)的结果接近目标,但在学龄前儿童和长日托儿童中有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australasian Journal of Early Childhood (AJEC) is Australasia’s foremost scholarly journal and the world’s longest-running major journal within the early childhood education and care sector. Published quarterly, AJEC offers evidence-based articles that are designed to impart new information and encourage the critical exchange of ideas among early childhood practitioners, academics and students. AJEC is peer reviewed by leading early childhood education and care academics, against quality-assurance guidelines to ensure that all articles promote best practice and disseminate high-quality information in the early childhood education and care sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信