Two Birds With One Stone: Writing a Paper Entitled “ChatGPT as a Tool for Studying Human-AI Interaction in the Wild” with ChatGPT

N. Tenhundfeld
{"title":"Two Birds With One Stone: Writing a Paper Entitled “ChatGPT as a Tool for Studying Human-AI Interaction in the Wild” with ChatGPT","authors":"N. Tenhundfeld","doi":"10.1177/21695067231192916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have seemed to be quite as captivating for the public as was the release of ChatGPT by OpenAI. This chatbot has been able to provide remarkably accurate answers to factual questions, write workable code in a variety of programming languages, and generate human-like text passages on any number of topics. Because, at the time of writing, this technology is so new, there is a need to understand the capabilities and limitations of the system. This includes understanding the nature of collaborative and iterative writing. This paper reviews an attempt to write a conference proceedings paper on the ways in which to use ChatGPT to study human-AI interaction. Evaluation of output and the iterative processes required shows the strengths of ChatGPT’s context awareness, while highlighting its limitations in attempts to provide academic references. Additionally, metrics of passage similarity to prior passages is assessed.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"54 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Few advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have seemed to be quite as captivating for the public as was the release of ChatGPT by OpenAI. This chatbot has been able to provide remarkably accurate answers to factual questions, write workable code in a variety of programming languages, and generate human-like text passages on any number of topics. Because, at the time of writing, this technology is so new, there is a need to understand the capabilities and limitations of the system. This includes understanding the nature of collaborative and iterative writing. This paper reviews an attempt to write a conference proceedings paper on the ways in which to use ChatGPT to study human-AI interaction. Evaluation of output and the iterative processes required shows the strengths of ChatGPT’s context awareness, while highlighting its limitations in attempts to provide academic references. Additionally, metrics of passage similarity to prior passages is assessed.
一石二鸟:用 ChatGPT 撰写题为 "将 ChatGPT 作为研究野外人机交互的工具 "的论文
在人工智能(AI)领域,几乎没有什么进步能像OpenAI发布的ChatGPT那样吸引公众。这个聊天机器人已经能够为实际问题提供非常准确的答案,用各种编程语言编写可操作的代码,并在任何数量的主题上生成类似人类的文本段落。因为在撰写本文时,这项技术是如此新颖,因此需要了解该系统的功能和局限性。这包括理解协作和迭代写作的本质。本文回顾了一篇关于使用ChatGPT研究人类与人工智能交互方式的会议论文的尝试。对输出和所需迭代过程的评估显示了ChatGPT上下文感知的优势,同时强调了其在提供学术参考方面的局限性。此外,评估了通道与先前通道的相似性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信