Free riding, democracy, and sacrifice in the workplace: Evidence from a real-effort experiment

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Kenju Kamei, Katy Tabero
{"title":"Free riding, democracy, and sacrifice in the workplace: Evidence from a real-effort experiment","authors":"Kenju Kamei, Katy Tabero","doi":"10.1111/jems.12570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teams are increasingly popular decision-making and work units in firms. This paper uses a novel real-effort experiment to show that (a) some teams in the workplace reduce their members' private benefits to achieve a group optimum in a social dilemma and (b) such endogenous choices by themselves enhance their work productivity (per-work-time production)—a phenomenon called the “dividend of democracy.” In the experiment, worker subjects are randomly assigned to a team of three, and they then jointly solve a collaborative real-effort task under a revenue-sharing rule in their group with two other teams, while each individual worker can privately and independently shirk by playing a Tetris game. Strikingly, teams exhibit significantly higher productivity (per-work-time production) when they can decide whether to reduce the return from shirking by voting than when the policy implementation is randomly decided from above, irrespective of the policy implementation outcome. This means that democratic culture directly affects behavior. On the other hand, the workers under democracy also increase their shirking, presumably due to enhanced fatigue owing to the stronger productivity. Despite this, democracy does not decrease overall production thanks to the enhanced work productivity.","PeriodicalId":47931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics & Management Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teams are increasingly popular decision-making and work units in firms. This paper uses a novel real-effort experiment to show that (a) some teams in the workplace reduce their members' private benefits to achieve a group optimum in a social dilemma and (b) such endogenous choices by themselves enhance their work productivity (per-work-time production)—a phenomenon called the “dividend of democracy.” In the experiment, worker subjects are randomly assigned to a team of three, and they then jointly solve a collaborative real-effort task under a revenue-sharing rule in their group with two other teams, while each individual worker can privately and independently shirk by playing a Tetris game. Strikingly, teams exhibit significantly higher productivity (per-work-time production) when they can decide whether to reduce the return from shirking by voting than when the policy implementation is randomly decided from above, irrespective of the policy implementation outcome. This means that democratic culture directly affects behavior. On the other hand, the workers under democracy also increase their shirking, presumably due to enhanced fatigue owing to the stronger productivity. Despite this, democracy does not decrease overall production thanks to the enhanced work productivity.
工作场所的免费搭车、民主和牺牲:来自实际努力实验的证据
团队是企业中越来越受欢迎的决策和工作单位。本文通过一个新颖的实际付出劳动实验来证明:(a)工作场所中的一些团队会减少其成员的私人利益,以实现社会困境中的群体最优;(b)这种内生性选择本身会提高他们的工作效率(单位工时产量)--这种现象被称为 "民主红利"。在实验中,受试工人被随机分配到一个三人小组,然后在小组内与其他两个小组按照收入共享规则共同解决一项协作性实际付出劳动任务,而每个工人个人则可以通过玩俄罗斯方块游戏来私下独立推卸责任。令人吃惊的是,当团队可以通过投票决定是否减少推卸责任带来的收益时,无论政策执行结果如何,团队的生产率(单位工时产量)都明显高于由上层随机决定政策执行的情况。这说明民主文化会直接影响行为。另一方面,民主制度下的工人也会增加推卸责任的行为,这可能是由于生产率提高导致疲劳感增强。尽管如此,由于工作效率的提高,民主制度并没有降低总产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信