Unpaid Work—What Does It Matter?

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Barbara Broadway
{"title":"Unpaid Work—What Does It Matter?","authors":"Barbara Broadway","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.12537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When we think of economic activity, and even of work specifically, as economists we tend to overlook work that is not paid. And yet, looking after elderly family members, caring for and educating children, or preparing family dinners, are all essential services to our community and play an important role for individual wellbeing and health and social cohesion. As governments in many developing countries increasingly recognise—including the Australian Government with its recently developed <i>Measuring What Matters Framework</i>—national well-being goes beyond our financial situation and includes health, safety, sustainability and more. Many of those often-overlooked aspects of wellbeing are significantly supported by unpaid work.</p><p>One of the challenges for social scientists who are interested in unpaid work as an important input into our national wellbeing is the scarcity of available data. They are not included in administrative records and expensive to measure in surveys. There are two resources Australian researchers can rely on: first, the Australian Bureau of Statistics has recently published a new Time Use Survey (TUS 2020-21), a cross-sectional data set with detailed diary information form participants. And second, the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey includes a range of questions asking respondents about their activities in a typical week. Both are invaluable resources for researchers of unpaid work in Australia.</p><p>This issue of the <i>Australian Economic Review</i> devotes its Policy Forum to unpaid work. We present three articles that all use HILDA Survey data and tackle some of the many issues surrounding unpaid work, highlighting its wide-ranging impacts on the way we live. Considering the enormous amount of time we devote to this often overlooked part of our economy, many more questions necessarily remain, and may be explored in future fora. I hope some of our readers may be inspired to make use of Australia's time-use data—both the TUS and the HILDA survey—for further discoveries.</p><p>Janeen Baxter, Alice Campbell and Rennie Lee analyse trends in the gender patterns of unpaid labour over time and find that the gender gap in unpaid care work has remained almost unchanged in the last two decades, and any narrowing of the gap in housework is due to women performing less housework without men doing more. A gender gap in unpaid work is already present in 15-year-olds but increases greatly at entry into parenthood. They also find the impact of parenthood on the gender gap in unpaid work to be far greater than that of Victoria's COVID-19 lockdowns, which were among the strictest and longest in the world. That gendered work patterns were moved so comparatively little by even such a drastic change in external circumstances demonstrates the difficulty of changing pervasive norms and behaviours.</p><p>But what are the consequences of the gender gap in unpaid work? Nataliya Ilyushina takes a close look at the impact of housework on mental health. She finds that many different tasks are summarised under the term ‘housework’, and that those different tasks can have very different impacts on mental health. The more repetitive tasks that offer little control over schedule—such as errands—are detrimental for mental health while less repetitive tasks can be beneficial up to a certain point. The author points out the good news: the tasks that are most detrimental to mental health are also the ones that are easiest to outsource and automate, if families make smart use of digital technologies and services.</p><p>Kristin Snopkowski analyses the impact of unpaid work on family size. Specifically, she looks at whether an imbalance in unpaid work that is also perceived as unfair hinders couple families' progression to further births. She finds that this is not the case for one-child families, but families with two children are indeed less likely to have additional children if there is an unfair division of unpaid work. This is mostly mediated by a deterioration in relationship quality.</p><p>I hope you enjoy these insightful pieces.</p>","PeriodicalId":46348,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Review","volume":"56 4","pages":"500-501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.12537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.12537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When we think of economic activity, and even of work specifically, as economists we tend to overlook work that is not paid. And yet, looking after elderly family members, caring for and educating children, or preparing family dinners, are all essential services to our community and play an important role for individual wellbeing and health and social cohesion. As governments in many developing countries increasingly recognise—including the Australian Government with its recently developed Measuring What Matters Framework—national well-being goes beyond our financial situation and includes health, safety, sustainability and more. Many of those often-overlooked aspects of wellbeing are significantly supported by unpaid work.

One of the challenges for social scientists who are interested in unpaid work as an important input into our national wellbeing is the scarcity of available data. They are not included in administrative records and expensive to measure in surveys. There are two resources Australian researchers can rely on: first, the Australian Bureau of Statistics has recently published a new Time Use Survey (TUS 2020-21), a cross-sectional data set with detailed diary information form participants. And second, the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey includes a range of questions asking respondents about their activities in a typical week. Both are invaluable resources for researchers of unpaid work in Australia.

This issue of the Australian Economic Review devotes its Policy Forum to unpaid work. We present three articles that all use HILDA Survey data and tackle some of the many issues surrounding unpaid work, highlighting its wide-ranging impacts on the way we live. Considering the enormous amount of time we devote to this often overlooked part of our economy, many more questions necessarily remain, and may be explored in future fora. I hope some of our readers may be inspired to make use of Australia's time-use data—both the TUS and the HILDA survey—for further discoveries.

Janeen Baxter, Alice Campbell and Rennie Lee analyse trends in the gender patterns of unpaid labour over time and find that the gender gap in unpaid care work has remained almost unchanged in the last two decades, and any narrowing of the gap in housework is due to women performing less housework without men doing more. A gender gap in unpaid work is already present in 15-year-olds but increases greatly at entry into parenthood. They also find the impact of parenthood on the gender gap in unpaid work to be far greater than that of Victoria's COVID-19 lockdowns, which were among the strictest and longest in the world. That gendered work patterns were moved so comparatively little by even such a drastic change in external circumstances demonstrates the difficulty of changing pervasive norms and behaviours.

But what are the consequences of the gender gap in unpaid work? Nataliya Ilyushina takes a close look at the impact of housework on mental health. She finds that many different tasks are summarised under the term ‘housework’, and that those different tasks can have very different impacts on mental health. The more repetitive tasks that offer little control over schedule—such as errands—are detrimental for mental health while less repetitive tasks can be beneficial up to a certain point. The author points out the good news: the tasks that are most detrimental to mental health are also the ones that are easiest to outsource and automate, if families make smart use of digital technologies and services.

Kristin Snopkowski analyses the impact of unpaid work on family size. Specifically, she looks at whether an imbalance in unpaid work that is also perceived as unfair hinders couple families' progression to further births. She finds that this is not the case for one-child families, but families with two children are indeed less likely to have additional children if there is an unfair division of unpaid work. This is mostly mediated by a deterioration in relationship quality.

I hope you enjoy these insightful pieces.

无偿工作--有什么关系?
作为经济学家,当我们考虑经济活动,甚至是具体的工作时,我们往往会忽略那些没有报酬的工作。然而,照顾家中老人、照顾和教育子女或准备家庭晚餐,都是我们社区的基本服务,对个人福祉、健康和社会凝聚力起着重要作用。许多发展中国家的政府,包括澳大利亚政府最近制定的 "衡量重要事项框架",都越来越认识到,国民福祉不仅仅是我们的经济状况,还包括健康、安全、可持续性等。对于那些对无偿工作感兴趣的社会科学家来说,他们面临的挑战之一是可用数据的匮乏。这些数据不包括在行政记录中,而且在调查中的测量成本也很高。澳大利亚的研究人员可以依靠两种资源:首先,澳大利亚统计局最近发布了一项新的时间利用调查(TUS 2020-21),这是一个包含参与者详细日记信息的横截面数据集。其次,澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(HILDA)包含一系列问题,询问受访者一周内典型的活动情况。本期《澳大利亚经济评论》(Australian Economic Review)的政策论坛将专门讨论无偿工作问题。本期《澳大利亚经济评论》的 "政策论坛 "将专门讨论无偿工作问题。我们将介绍三篇文章,这些文章都使用了 HILDA 调查的数据,并探讨了围绕无偿工作的诸多问题,强调了无偿工作对我们生活方式的广泛影响。考虑到我们花了大量的时间来研究这个经常被忽视的经济部分,必然还有更多的问题有待解决,并可能在未来的论坛上进行探讨。简恩-巴克斯特(Janeen Baxter)、爱丽丝-坎贝尔(Alice Campbell)和雷尼-李(Rennie Lee)分析了无偿劳动的性别模式随时间变化的趋势,发现在过去二十年中,无偿护理工作的性别差距几乎没有变化,家务劳动差距的缩小是由于女性家务劳动减少而男性家务劳动增加。无偿工作方面的性别差距在 15 岁时就已经存在,但在为人父母后又大大增加。他们还发现,为人父母对无偿工作性别差距的影响远远大于维多利亚州 COVID-19 禁闭政策的影响,后者是世界上最严格、时间最长的禁闭政策之一。即使外部环境发生了如此剧烈的变化,性别工作模式所受的影响也相对较小,这表明要改变普遍存在的规范和行为是非常困难的。Nataliya Ilyushina 仔细研究了家务劳动对心理健康的影响。她发现,"家务劳动 "一词下可以概括出许多不同的任务,而这些不同的任务对心理健康的影响也大相径庭。几乎无法控制时间安排的重复性较高的工作,如跑腿,对心理健康不利,而重复性较低的工作在一定程度上是有益的。作者指出了一个好消息:如果家庭巧妙地利用数字技术和服务,对心理健康最不利的工作也是最容易外包和自动化的工作。克里斯汀-斯诺普科夫斯基分析了无偿工作对家庭规模的影响。具体而言,她研究了无偿工作的不平衡是否也被视为不公平,是否会阻碍夫妻家庭进一步生育。她发现,独生子女家庭的情况并非如此,但如果无偿工作分工不公平,有两个孩子的家庭确实不太可能再生育。这主要是通过夫妻关系质量的恶化来调节的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: An applied economics journal with a strong policy orientation, The Australian Economic Review publishes high-quality articles applying economic analysis to a wide range of macroeconomic and microeconomic topics relevant to both economic and social policy issues. Produced by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, it is the leading journal of its kind in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. While it is of special interest to Australian academics, students, policy makers, and others interested in the Australian economy, the journal also considers matters of international interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信