Addressing the stagnation issue in accounting education research while incorporating mainstream publications and professional practice into the accounting curriculum
Andrea Everard , Martin Kim , Jing Lin , Kent St. Pierre
{"title":"Addressing the stagnation issue in accounting education research while incorporating mainstream publications and professional practice into the accounting curriculum","authors":"Andrea Everard , Martin Kim , Jing Lin , Kent St. Pierre","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accounting practice and academic research-oriented sides of the profession have had difficulties concerning the integration of their outputs. The practice side has maintained that very little of the “mainstream” research produced by academics has been of value in their day to day activities, and the research side has complained about the lack of cooperation as to the availability of data from the practice segment that is needed to conduct academic research. Add to this situation the teaching focused faculty of the profession, who contend that the research conducted in the “mainstream” is of little value to their efforts in teaching undergraduate and graduate students. Additionally, faculty in the classroom need input from the practice side to determine what information the students need to be successful after graduation. The problems were noted in 2012 by the AICPA and AAA supported Pathways Commission in their major report, with questionable efforts to date addressing the concerns. Take all of these components together and you have a view of our current “situation” in accounting.</p><p>We attempt, in this paper, to further address the previously identified stagnation in accounting education research (Rebele and St. Pierre, 2015) and, at the same time, to bridge the gaps between these different accounting groups noted by the Pathways Commission. We do this by offering a potentially unique solution to address the current accounting environment. First, we analyze the findings from a mainstream research study that both examines the practice side of the equation and directly affects our classroom coverage of topics in several of the required undergraduate and graduate courses typically found in accounting programs around the country. Second, this paper breaks from many of the current education articles in that we examine what should be taught in the classroom based on actual real - world practice issues rather than hypothetical academic approaches to the topics covered. Third, our efforts in tying together the three components - mainstream research, practice, and classroom content - will hopefully move our colleagues in a direction that benefits our students and opens new accounting education research opportunities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The accounting practice and academic research-oriented sides of the profession have had difficulties concerning the integration of their outputs. The practice side has maintained that very little of the “mainstream” research produced by academics has been of value in their day to day activities, and the research side has complained about the lack of cooperation as to the availability of data from the practice segment that is needed to conduct academic research. Add to this situation the teaching focused faculty of the profession, who contend that the research conducted in the “mainstream” is of little value to their efforts in teaching undergraduate and graduate students. Additionally, faculty in the classroom need input from the practice side to determine what information the students need to be successful after graduation. The problems were noted in 2012 by the AICPA and AAA supported Pathways Commission in their major report, with questionable efforts to date addressing the concerns. Take all of these components together and you have a view of our current “situation” in accounting.
We attempt, in this paper, to further address the previously identified stagnation in accounting education research (Rebele and St. Pierre, 2015) and, at the same time, to bridge the gaps between these different accounting groups noted by the Pathways Commission. We do this by offering a potentially unique solution to address the current accounting environment. First, we analyze the findings from a mainstream research study that both examines the practice side of the equation and directly affects our classroom coverage of topics in several of the required undergraduate and graduate courses typically found in accounting programs around the country. Second, this paper breaks from many of the current education articles in that we examine what should be taught in the classroom based on actual real - world practice issues rather than hypothetical academic approaches to the topics covered. Third, our efforts in tying together the three components - mainstream research, practice, and classroom content - will hopefully move our colleagues in a direction that benefits our students and opens new accounting education research opportunities.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.