Comparing the environmental impacts of using bio-renewable and fossil-derived solvent in polymer membrane fabrications

Aiman Arif, Nadhita Chanchaona, Cher Hon Lau
{"title":"Comparing the environmental impacts of using bio-renewable and fossil-derived solvent in polymer membrane fabrications","authors":"Aiman Arif,&nbsp;Nadhita Chanchaona,&nbsp;Cher Hon Lau","doi":"10.1016/j.advmem.2023.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable production methods for polymer membrane fabrication are gaining attention due to concerns about the toxicity of conventional fossil-derived solvents in the production process. In addition, the promotion of using chemicals from renewable source for synthesis processes among industries and researches has increased to decelerate resource depletion. As such, more benign and bio-renewable solvents, dihydrolevoglucosenone (Cyrene™) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF), have been proposed as replacements for traditional fossil-derived solvents, n-hexane and dimethylformamide (DMF). In this work, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to quantitatively evaluate the environmental impacts of using the aforementioned bio-renewable solvents versus fossil-derived solvents for fabricating 1 ​g of polymer membrane. The analysis adopted a cradle-to-gate perspective and assessed three endpoint impact categories: Human health, Ecosystems and Resources. Despite lower environmental impacts for producing bio-renewable solvents, using such solvents to fabricate membranes displayed a higher environmental impact score in all endpoint categories. This discrepancy was attributed to the lower yield of the membrane fabrication process when using bio-based solvents. This indicated that further work is needed to optimise membrane fabrication so that the benefits of using bio-based solvents can be maximised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100033,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Membranes","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772823423000209/pdfft?md5=7e83c3cbaf16e5560bc3b80e201f5489&pid=1-s2.0-S2772823423000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Membranes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772823423000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable production methods for polymer membrane fabrication are gaining attention due to concerns about the toxicity of conventional fossil-derived solvents in the production process. In addition, the promotion of using chemicals from renewable source for synthesis processes among industries and researches has increased to decelerate resource depletion. As such, more benign and bio-renewable solvents, dihydrolevoglucosenone (Cyrene™) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF), have been proposed as replacements for traditional fossil-derived solvents, n-hexane and dimethylformamide (DMF). In this work, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to quantitatively evaluate the environmental impacts of using the aforementioned bio-renewable solvents versus fossil-derived solvents for fabricating 1 ​g of polymer membrane. The analysis adopted a cradle-to-gate perspective and assessed three endpoint impact categories: Human health, Ecosystems and Resources. Despite lower environmental impacts for producing bio-renewable solvents, using such solvents to fabricate membranes displayed a higher environmental impact score in all endpoint categories. This discrepancy was attributed to the lower yield of the membrane fabrication process when using bio-based solvents. This indicated that further work is needed to optimise membrane fabrication so that the benefits of using bio-based solvents can be maximised.

Abstract Image

比较在聚合物膜制造中使用生物可再生溶剂和化石衍生溶剂对环境的影响
由于生产过程中传统化石衍生溶剂的毒性问题,聚合物膜制造的可持续生产方法日益受到关注。此外,为了减少资源枯竭,工业界和研究人员越来越多地提倡在合成过程中使用可再生来源的化学品。因此,有人提出用更加良性和生物可再生的溶剂--二氢左旋葡烯酮(Cyrene™)和 2-甲基四氢呋喃(2-MeTHF)来替代传统的化石衍生溶剂--正己烷和二甲基甲酰胺(DMF)。在这项工作中,采用了生命周期评估(LCA)来定量评估使用上述生物可再生溶剂和化石衍生溶剂制造 1 克聚合物膜对环境的影响。分析采用了 "从摇篮到终点 "的视角,评估了三个终点影响类别:人类健康、生态系统和资源。尽管生产生物可再生溶剂对环境的影响较小,但在所有端点影响类别中,使用此类溶剂制造膜的环境影响得分较高。造成这种差异的原因是,使用生物基溶剂时,膜制造过程的产量较低。这表明,需要进一步开展工作,优化膜制造,从而最大限度地发挥使用生物基溶剂的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信