Validation set sampling strategies for predictive process monitoring

IF 3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jari Peeperkorn , Seppe vanden Broucke , Jochen De Weerdt
{"title":"Validation set sampling strategies for predictive process monitoring","authors":"Jari Peeperkorn ,&nbsp;Seppe vanden Broucke ,&nbsp;Jochen De Weerdt","doi":"10.1016/j.is.2023.102330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies investigating the efficacy of long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks in predictive process monitoring and their ability to capture the underlying process structure have raised concerns about their limited ability to generalize to unseen behavior. Event logs often fail to capture the full spectrum of behavior permitted by the underlying processes. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces innovative validation set sampling strategies based on control-flow variant-based resampling. These strategies have undergone extensive evaluation to assess their impact on hyperparameter selection and early stopping, resulting in notable enhancements to the generalization capabilities of trained LSTM models. In addition, this study expands the experimental framework to enable accurate interpretation of underlying process models and provide valuable insights. By conducting experiments with event logs representing process models of varying complexities, this research elucidates the effectiveness of the proposed validation strategies. Furthermore, the extended framework facilitates investigations into the influence of event log completeness on the learning quality of predictive process models. The novel validation set sampling strategies proposed in this study facilitate the development of more effective and reliable predictive process models, ultimately bolstering generalization capabilities and improving the understanding of underlying process dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50363,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437923001667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies investigating the efficacy of long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks in predictive process monitoring and their ability to capture the underlying process structure have raised concerns about their limited ability to generalize to unseen behavior. Event logs often fail to capture the full spectrum of behavior permitted by the underlying processes. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces innovative validation set sampling strategies based on control-flow variant-based resampling. These strategies have undergone extensive evaluation to assess their impact on hyperparameter selection and early stopping, resulting in notable enhancements to the generalization capabilities of trained LSTM models. In addition, this study expands the experimental framework to enable accurate interpretation of underlying process models and provide valuable insights. By conducting experiments with event logs representing process models of varying complexities, this research elucidates the effectiveness of the proposed validation strategies. Furthermore, the extended framework facilitates investigations into the influence of event log completeness on the learning quality of predictive process models. The novel validation set sampling strategies proposed in this study facilitate the development of more effective and reliable predictive process models, ultimately bolstering generalization capabilities and improving the understanding of underlying process dynamics.

用于预测性过程监测的验证集采样策略
以前的研究调查了长短期记忆(LSTM)递归神经网络在预测性流程监控中的功效及其捕捉底层流程结构的能力,这些研究引起了人们对这些网络泛化到未见行为的能力有限的担忧。事件日志往往无法捕捉底层进程所允许的全部行为。为了克服这些挑战,本研究引入了基于控制流变体重采样的创新验证集采样策略。这些策略经过了广泛的评估,以评估其对超参数选择和早期停止的影响,从而显著增强了训练有素的 LSTM 模型的泛化能力。此外,本研究还扩展了实验框架,以便准确解释底层流程模型并提供有价值的见解。通过对代表不同复杂度流程模型的事件日志进行实验,本研究阐明了所提出的验证策略的有效性。此外,扩展框架还有助于研究事件日志完整性对预测流程模型学习质量的影响。本研究提出的新型验证集采样策略有助于开发更有效、更可靠的预测性流程模型,最终增强泛化能力,提高对潜在流程动态的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems
Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
112
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Information systems are the software and hardware systems that support data-intensive applications. The journal Information Systems publishes articles concerning the design and implementation of languages, data models, process models, algorithms, software and hardware for information systems. Subject areas include data management issues as presented in the principal international database conferences (e.g., ACM SIGMOD/PODS, VLDB, ICDE and ICDT/EDBT) as well as data-related issues from the fields of data mining/machine learning, information retrieval coordinated with structured data, internet and cloud data management, business process management, web semantics, visual and audio information systems, scientific computing, and data science. Implementation papers having to do with massively parallel data management, fault tolerance in practice, and special purpose hardware for data-intensive systems are also welcome. Manuscripts from application domains, such as urban informatics, social and natural science, and Internet of Things, are also welcome. All papers should highlight innovative solutions to data management problems such as new data models, performance enhancements, and show how those innovations contribute to the goals of the application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信