Identifying fake vs. real communication records: A case study

Q3 Medicine
Graeme Horsman
{"title":"Identifying fake vs. real communication records: A case study","authors":"Graeme Horsman","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2023.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Records of communication often play an important role in many criminal inquiries giving insight into existing and alleged relationships. The forensic analysis of digital devices can provide such information, however in some cases, screen captured records may be all that is available. In these instances, it is necessary to evaluate the authenticity of this information given the availability of free to use communication record mockup services that can be used to create realistic looking, but fictitious communication records. This work seeks to ascertain whether freely available communication record mockup services pose a threat to law enforcement officers in terms of not being able to distinguish a communication record mockup from a genuine communication record screen capture. An evaluation of communication record mockup services for creating WhatsApp, iMessage and Twitter mockups are identified and their ability to create realistic communication record mockups is evaluated. The results of these tests are provided and discussed, and 41 communication record mockups are supplied forming one of the first datasets to support those conducting communication record authenticity checks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910723000415/pdfft?md5=3159ebad10fa19ad2051c7c5a12fd373&pid=1-s2.0-S2665910723000415-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910723000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Records of communication often play an important role in many criminal inquiries giving insight into existing and alleged relationships. The forensic analysis of digital devices can provide such information, however in some cases, screen captured records may be all that is available. In these instances, it is necessary to evaluate the authenticity of this information given the availability of free to use communication record mockup services that can be used to create realistic looking, but fictitious communication records. This work seeks to ascertain whether freely available communication record mockup services pose a threat to law enforcement officers in terms of not being able to distinguish a communication record mockup from a genuine communication record screen capture. An evaluation of communication record mockup services for creating WhatsApp, iMessage and Twitter mockups are identified and their ability to create realistic communication record mockups is evaluated. The results of these tests are provided and discussed, and 41 communication record mockups are supplied forming one of the first datasets to support those conducting communication record authenticity checks.

识别虚假与真实的通信记录:案例研究
在许多刑事调查中,通信记录往往发挥着重要作用,可以让人深入了解现有的和被指控的关系。对数字设备的取证分析可以提供此类信息,但在某些情况下,屏幕截图记录可能是唯一可用的信息。在这种情况下,有必要对这些信息的真实性进行评估,因为有免费的通信记录模拟服务可以用来创建外观逼真但虚构的通信记录。这项工作旨在确定免费提供的通信记录模拟服务是否会对执法人员造成威胁,因为执法人员无法区分通信记录模拟和真正的通信记录屏幕截图。我们确定了用于创建 WhatsApp、iMessage 和 Twitter 模拟的通信记录模拟服务,并对其创建真实通信记录模拟的能力进行了评估。提供并讨论了这些测试的结果,并提供了 41 个通信记录模拟,形成了首批数据集,为进行通信记录真实性检查的人员提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信