A Vulnerability Index for Mitigation and Prevention of Diabetes Growth in India: A Disaggregated Analysis

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sujata Sujata PhD , Gayathri B. PhD , Ramna Thakur PhD
{"title":"A Vulnerability Index for Mitigation and Prevention of Diabetes Growth in India: A Disaggregated Analysis","authors":"Sujata Sujata PhD ,&nbsp;Gayathri B. PhD ,&nbsp;Ramna Thakur PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to provide a vulnerability index (VI) for identifying vulnerable regions in different states of India, which may serve as a tool for state- and district-level planning for mitigation and prevention of diabetes growth in the country.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data on 13 indicators under 4 domains, we generated domain-specific and overall VIs at state (36 states/union territories) and district levels (640 districts) using the percentile ranking method. The association of diabetes with individuals’ socioeconomic status at different levels of regional vulnerability has also been observed through multivariable logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On a scale of 0 to 1, there are 13 states with an overall VI of &gt;0.70, of which 5 states are from southern regions of India. A low VI has been achieved by socioeconomically backward states. We observed that prevalence rates and vulnerability levels for most of the top and bottom 11 states are in the same line. District-level analysis showed that the 20 most vulnerable and least vulnerable districts are mostly from coastal and socioeconomically backward states of the country, respectively. Furthermore, logistic regression revealed that rural adults and females are less likely to be diabetic in all vulnerability quartiles. The oldest, Muslims, wealthiest, widowed/deserted/separated, and those with schooling ≤12 years are significantly more likely to be diabetic than their counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The constructed VI is vital for identifying vulnerable areas and planners and policy-makers may use this comprehensive index and domain-specific VIs to prioritize resource allocation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221210992300095X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to provide a vulnerability index (VI) for identifying vulnerable regions in different states of India, which may serve as a tool for state- and district-level planning for mitigation and prevention of diabetes growth in the country.

Methods

Using data on 13 indicators under 4 domains, we generated domain-specific and overall VIs at state (36 states/union territories) and district levels (640 districts) using the percentile ranking method. The association of diabetes with individuals’ socioeconomic status at different levels of regional vulnerability has also been observed through multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

On a scale of 0 to 1, there are 13 states with an overall VI of >0.70, of which 5 states are from southern regions of India. A low VI has been achieved by socioeconomically backward states. We observed that prevalence rates and vulnerability levels for most of the top and bottom 11 states are in the same line. District-level analysis showed that the 20 most vulnerable and least vulnerable districts are mostly from coastal and socioeconomically backward states of the country, respectively. Furthermore, logistic regression revealed that rural adults and females are less likely to be diabetic in all vulnerability quartiles. The oldest, Muslims, wealthiest, widowed/deserted/separated, and those with schooling ≤12 years are significantly more likely to be diabetic than their counterparts.

Conclusion

The constructed VI is vital for identifying vulnerable areas and planners and policy-makers may use this comprehensive index and domain-specific VIs to prioritize resource allocation.

印度缓解和预防糖尿病增长的脆弱性指数:分类分析
方法利用 4 个领域 13 个指标的数据,我们采用百分位数排名法生成了邦(36 个邦/中央直辖区)和区(640 个区)层面的特定领域和总体脆弱性指数。通过多变量逻辑回归模型,我们还观察了不同地区脆弱性水平下糖尿病与个人社会经济地位的关联。社会经济落后的邦的 VI 值较低。我们注意到,在排名前 11 个邦和排名后 11 个邦中,大多数邦的流行率和脆弱程度处于同一水平线上。地区层面的分析表明,20 个最脆弱和最不脆弱的地区分别来自该国的沿海和社会经济落后的州。此外,逻辑回归显示,在所有弱势四分位数中,农村成年人和女性患糖尿病的可能性较低。最年长者、穆斯林、最富有者、丧偶/荒漠/离散者以及受教育时间≤12 年者患糖尿病的可能性明显高于同类人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信