Volumetric differences in temporomandibular joint components in patients with facial asymmetry: A 3D tomographic segmentation study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Diego Fernando López , Nathalia Garcia Giraldo , Valentina Rios Borrás , Juan Manuel Muñoz , Carlos Flores-Mir
{"title":"Volumetric differences in temporomandibular joint components in patients with facial asymmetry: A 3D tomographic segmentation study","authors":"Diego Fernando López ,&nbsp;Nathalia Garcia Giraldo ,&nbsp;Valentina Rios Borrás ,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Muñoz ,&nbsp;Carlos Flores-Mir","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>To determine if there are differences in condylar volume, glenoid cavity and joint space between patients diagnosed with facial asymmetry (FA), between affected and </span>contralateral sides and with respect to subjects without FA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing CT/CBCT images from patients with FA diagnosis referred to a private clinic, versus a control group, age and sex matched, of patients requiring orthodontic treatment<span> without FA. The 3D Slicer software was used for the analysis. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare qualitative variables using Chi-square or </span></span>Fisher tests, and for normal distribution quantitative variables, the t-student test was used. The level of significance was </span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The FA group (<em>n</em> = 138) included: Hemimandibular Elongation (HE) (<em>n</em><span> = 64), Hemimandibular Hyperplasia (HH) (</span><em>n</em> = 12), Hybrid Form (HF) (<em>n</em><span> = 20), Asymmetric Mandibular Prognathism (AMP) (</span><em>n</em> = 25), Glenoid Cavity Asymmetry (GCA) (<em>n</em> = 9) and Functional Laterognathism (FL) (<em>n</em> = 8). The control group (<em>n</em><span> = 20) had no FA and no signs or symptoms<span> of temporomandibular dysfunction. The right condylar and glenoid cavity volumes were significantly larger in FA cases. The volumes of the right and left joint space had significant differences only in HE patients.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Condylar volumes are higher in almost all FA subgroups compared to matched controls. The glenoid cavity volume is larger in FA patients, except for the GCA right and FL left sides. Regarding articular spaces, HE was the only entity with less volume on the contralateral side. The evaluation of structural volume by 3D-CT images helps to diagnose and differentiate FA subgroups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"30 3","pages":"Pages 346-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107387462300110X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if there are differences in condylar volume, glenoid cavity and joint space between patients diagnosed with facial asymmetry (FA), between affected and contralateral sides and with respect to subjects without FA.

Methods

Cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing CT/CBCT images from patients with FA diagnosis referred to a private clinic, versus a control group, age and sex matched, of patients requiring orthodontic treatment without FA. The 3D Slicer software was used for the analysis. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare qualitative variables using Chi-square or Fisher tests, and for normal distribution quantitative variables, the t-student test was used. The level of significance was p < 0.05.

Results

The FA group (n = 138) included: Hemimandibular Elongation (HE) (n = 64), Hemimandibular Hyperplasia (HH) (n = 12), Hybrid Form (HF) (n = 20), Asymmetric Mandibular Prognathism (AMP) (n = 25), Glenoid Cavity Asymmetry (GCA) (n = 9) and Functional Laterognathism (FL) (n = 8). The control group (n = 20) had no FA and no signs or symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. The right condylar and glenoid cavity volumes were significantly larger in FA cases. The volumes of the right and left joint space had significant differences only in HE patients.

Conclusion

Condylar volumes are higher in almost all FA subgroups compared to matched controls. The glenoid cavity volume is larger in FA patients, except for the GCA right and FL left sides. Regarding articular spaces, HE was the only entity with less volume on the contralateral side. The evaluation of structural volume by 3D-CT images helps to diagnose and differentiate FA subgroups.

面部不对称患者颞下颌关节组件的体积差异:三维断层扫描分割研究
目的确定被诊断为面部不对称(FA)的患者在髁突体积、盂腔和关节间隙方面是否存在差异,患侧和对侧之间是否存在差异,以及与无 FA 的受试者之间是否存在差异。方法横断面回顾性研究比较了转诊到一家私人诊所的被诊断为 FA 的患者的 CT/CBCT 图像,以及年龄和性别匹配的对照组,即需要正畸治疗但无 FA 的患者。分析使用了 3D Slicer 软件。在比较定性变量时,使用卡方检验(Chi-square)或费雪检验(Fisher tests)进行双变量分析;在比较正态分布的定量变量时,使用t-学生检验(t-student test)。显著性水平为 p<0.05:FA组(n=138)包括:下颌前突(HE)(n=64)、下颌前突增生(HH)(n=12)、混合型(HF)(n=20)、非对称下颌前突(AMP)(n=25)、盂腔不对称(GCA)(n=9)和功能性后颌畸形(FL)(n=8)。对照组(20 人)没有 FA,也没有颞下颌功能障碍的体征或症状。FA病例的右侧髁状突和盂腔体积明显增大。结论与匹配的对照组相比,几乎所有FA亚组的髁突体积都更大。除 GCA 右侧和 FL 左侧外,FA 患者的盂腔体积更大。在关节间隙方面,HE是唯一一个对侧体积较小的实体。通过 3D-CT 图像评估结构体积有助于诊断和区分 FA 亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Orthodontics
Seminars in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 days
期刊介绍: Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信