Speciation and conservation genetic assessment of two endangered cycad species

IF 3.7 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Xiu-Yan Feng, Yi-Qing Gong, Khang Sinh Nguyen, Hiep Tien Nguyen, Yong-Bo Liu, Jian Liu, Xun Gong
{"title":"Speciation and conservation genetic assessment of two endangered cycad species","authors":"Xiu-Yan Feng, Yi-Qing Gong, Khang Sinh Nguyen, Hiep Tien Nguyen, Yong-Bo Liu, Jian Liu, Xun Gong","doi":"10.1111/jse.13031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the driving forces of speciation is a central question in evolutionary biology. <i>Cycas bifida</i> (Dyer) K. D. Hill and <i>Cycas micholitzii</i> Dyer are two morphologically similar <i>Cycas</i> (Cycadaceae) species with deeply pectinate megasporophylls and dichotomously divided leaflets. Geographically, they are isolated by the Red River Fault Zone (RRFZ), which acts as a biogeographical barrier for many <i>Cycas</i> species. In this study, we investigated the divergence, genetic diversity, genetic structure, and demographic history of <i>C. bifida</i> and <i>C. micholitzii</i> to uncover the speciation mechanisms for the two endangered species. Results revealed high historical gene flow but low contemporary gene flow between the two species, with a deep divergence occurring in the Late Miocene. The long-term geographical isolation and ecological niche differentiation were identified as important factors in driving the divergence of the two species, supported by significant isolation by distance testing, barrier analysis, and niche consistency detection. Geographical isolation by the RRFZ played a pivotal role in facilitating their divergence by constraining gene flow. Conservation genetic analyses indicated high genetic diversity within both species, coupled with disparate responses to Pleistocene climate fluctuations: <i>C. micholitzii</i> experienced population expansion, while <i>C. bifida</i> displayed a mild bottleneck effect. To ensure the protection and long-term sustainability of two threatened species, relevant conservation guidelines were proposed based on the assessment of their genetic diversity and structure. This study furnishes valuable insights into the mechanisms underpinning species divergence and delivers actionable recommendations for cycad conservation.","PeriodicalId":17087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systematics and Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systematics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.13031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the driving forces of speciation is a central question in evolutionary biology. Cycas bifida (Dyer) K. D. Hill and Cycas micholitzii Dyer are two morphologically similar Cycas (Cycadaceae) species with deeply pectinate megasporophylls and dichotomously divided leaflets. Geographically, they are isolated by the Red River Fault Zone (RRFZ), which acts as a biogeographical barrier for many Cycas species. In this study, we investigated the divergence, genetic diversity, genetic structure, and demographic history of C. bifida and C. micholitzii to uncover the speciation mechanisms for the two endangered species. Results revealed high historical gene flow but low contemporary gene flow between the two species, with a deep divergence occurring in the Late Miocene. The long-term geographical isolation and ecological niche differentiation were identified as important factors in driving the divergence of the two species, supported by significant isolation by distance testing, barrier analysis, and niche consistency detection. Geographical isolation by the RRFZ played a pivotal role in facilitating their divergence by constraining gene flow. Conservation genetic analyses indicated high genetic diversity within both species, coupled with disparate responses to Pleistocene climate fluctuations: C. micholitzii experienced population expansion, while C. bifida displayed a mild bottleneck effect. To ensure the protection and long-term sustainability of two threatened species, relevant conservation guidelines were proposed based on the assessment of their genetic diversity and structure. This study furnishes valuable insights into the mechanisms underpinning species divergence and delivers actionable recommendations for cycad conservation.

Abstract Image

两个濒危苏铁物种的变种和保护基因评估
了解物种分化的驱动力是进化生物学的一个核心问题。Cycas bifida (Dyer) K. D. Hill 和 Cycas micholitzii Dyer 是两种形态上相似的苏铁(苏铁科)物种,具有深栉状巨孢子叶和二歧分裂的小叶。在地理上,它们被红河断裂带(RRFZ)隔离,而红河断裂带是许多苏铁物种的生物地理屏障。在这项研究中,我们调查了C. bifida和C. micholitzii的分化、遗传多样性、遗传结构和人口历史,以揭示这两个濒危物种的物种分化机制。结果显示,这两个物种之间的历史基因流较高,但当代基因流较低,在晚中新世出现了深度分化。通过距离测试、障碍分析和生态位一致性检测发现,长期地理隔离和生态位分化是导致两个物种分化的重要因素。RRFZ的地理隔离限制了基因流动,在促进其分化方面发挥了关键作用。保护性遗传分析表明,这两个物种的遗传多样性都很高,同时对更新世气候波动的反应也不尽相同:micholitzii 经历了种群扩张,而 C. bifida 则表现出轻微的瓶颈效应。为确保这两个濒危物种的保护和长期可持续发展,我们在评估其遗传多样性和结构的基础上提出了相关的保护指南。这项研究为物种分化的机制提供了宝贵的见解,并为苏铁植物的保护提供了可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
Journal of Systematics and Evolution Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1368
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Systematics and Evolution (JSE, since 2008; formerly Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica) is a plant-based international journal newly dedicated to the description and understanding of the biological diversity. It covers: description of new taxa, monographic revision, phylogenetics, molecular evolution and genome evolution, evolutionary developmental biology, evolutionary ecology, population biology, conservation biology, biogeography, paleobiology, evolutionary theories, and related subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信