Advancing childhood cancer research through young investigator and advocate collaboration

Amber K Weiner, Antonia Palmer, Melanie Frost Moll, Gavin Lindberg, Kevin Reidy, Sharon J Diskin, Crystal L Mackall, John M. Maris, Patrick J Sullivan
{"title":"Advancing childhood cancer research through young investigator and advocate collaboration","authors":"Amber K Weiner, Antonia Palmer, Melanie Frost Moll, Gavin Lindberg, Kevin Reidy, Sharon J Diskin, Crystal L Mackall, John M. Maris, Patrick J Sullivan","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.03.569769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer advocates and researchers share the same goal of driving science forward to create new therapies to cure more patients. The power of combining cancer researchers and advocates has become of increased importance due to their complementary expertise. Therefore, advocacy is a critical component of grant structures and has become embedded into the Stand Up 2 Cancer (SU2C) applications. To date, the optimal way to combine these skillsets and experiences to benefit the cancer community is currently unknown. The Saint Baldrick's Foundation (SBF)-SU2C now called St. Baldrick's Empowering Pediatric Immunotherapies for Childhood Cancer (EPICC) Team is comprised of a collaborative network across nine institutions in the United States and Canada. Since SU2C encourages incorporating advocacy into the team structure, we have assembled a diverse team of advocates and scientists by nominating a young investigator (YI) and advocate from each site. In order to further bridge this interaction beyond virtual monthly and yearly in person meetings, we have developed a questionnaire and conducted interviews. The questionnaire is focused on understanding each member's experience at the intersection between science/advocacy, comparing to previous experiences, providing advice on incorporating advocacy into team science and discussing how we can build on our work. Through creating a YI and advocate infrastructure, we have cultivated a supportive environment for meaningful conversation that impacts the entire research team. We see this as a model for team science by combining expertise to drive innovation forward and positively impact pediatric cancer patients, and perhaps those with adult malignancies.","PeriodicalId":501568,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.03.569769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer advocates and researchers share the same goal of driving science forward to create new therapies to cure more patients. The power of combining cancer researchers and advocates has become of increased importance due to their complementary expertise. Therefore, advocacy is a critical component of grant structures and has become embedded into the Stand Up 2 Cancer (SU2C) applications. To date, the optimal way to combine these skillsets and experiences to benefit the cancer community is currently unknown. The Saint Baldrick's Foundation (SBF)-SU2C now called St. Baldrick's Empowering Pediatric Immunotherapies for Childhood Cancer (EPICC) Team is comprised of a collaborative network across nine institutions in the United States and Canada. Since SU2C encourages incorporating advocacy into the team structure, we have assembled a diverse team of advocates and scientists by nominating a young investigator (YI) and advocate from each site. In order to further bridge this interaction beyond virtual monthly and yearly in person meetings, we have developed a questionnaire and conducted interviews. The questionnaire is focused on understanding each member's experience at the intersection between science/advocacy, comparing to previous experiences, providing advice on incorporating advocacy into team science and discussing how we can build on our work. Through creating a YI and advocate infrastructure, we have cultivated a supportive environment for meaningful conversation that impacts the entire research team. We see this as a model for team science by combining expertise to drive innovation forward and positively impact pediatric cancer patients, and perhaps those with adult malignancies.
通过青年研究者和倡导合作推进儿童癌症研究
癌症倡导者和研究人员有着共同的目标,那就是推动科学发展,创造新的治疗方法,治愈更多的病人。结合癌症研究人员和倡导者的力量已经变得越来越重要,因为他们的专业知识互补。因此,倡导是资助结构的关键组成部分,并已融入到“站起来癌症”(SU2C)的申请中。迄今为止,将这些技能和经验结合起来造福癌症社区的最佳方式目前尚不清楚。圣巴尔德里克基金会(SBF)-SU2C现在被称为圣巴尔德里克儿童癌症免疫疗法授权(EPICC)团队,由美国和加拿大九个机构的合作网络组成。由于SU2C鼓励将倡导纳入团队结构,我们通过从每个站点提名一名年轻的研究者(YI)和倡导者,组建了一个多元化的倡导者和科学家团队。为了在虚拟的每月和每年的面对面会议之外进一步弥合这种互动,我们制定了一份调查问卷并进行了采访。问卷调查的重点是了解每个成员在科学/倡导交叉领域的经验,与之前的经验进行比较,为将倡导纳入团队科学提供建议,并讨论我们如何在工作基础上进一步发展。通过创建YI和倡导基础设施,我们为影响整个研究团队的有意义的对话培养了一个支持性环境。我们认为这是一个团队科学的模式,通过结合专业知识来推动创新,并积极影响儿科癌症患者,也许还有那些患有成人恶性肿瘤的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信