ChatGPT: ascertaining the self-evident. The use of AI in generating human knowledge

Ioannis D. Apostolopoulos, Mpesi Tzani, Sokratis I. Aznaouridis
{"title":"ChatGPT: ascertaining the self-evident. The use of AI in generating human knowledge","authors":"Ioannis D. Apostolopoulos, Mpesi Tzani, Sokratis I. Aznaouridis","doi":"arxiv-2308.06373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental principles, potential applications, and ethical concerns of\nChatGPT are analyzed and discussed in this study. Since ChatGPT emerged, it has\ngained a rapidly growing popularity, with more than 600 million users today.\nThe development of ChatGPT was a significant mile-stone, as it demonstrated the\npotential of large-scale language models to generate natural language responses\nthat are almost indistinguishable from those of a human. ChatGPT's operational\nprinciples, prospective applications, and ability to advance a range of human\nendeavours are discussed in the paper. However, much of the work discusses and\nposes moral and other problems that rely on the subject. To document the\nlatter, we submitted 14 queries and captured the ChatGPT responses. ChatGPT\nappeared to be honest, self-knowledgeable, and careful with its answers. The\nauthors come to the realization that since AI is already a part of society, the\npervasiveness of the ChatGPT tool to the general public has once again brought\nto light concerns regarding AI in general. Still, they have moved from the\ndomain of scientific community collective reflection at a conceptual level to\neveryday practice this time.","PeriodicalId":501310,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2308.06373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fundamental principles, potential applications, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT are analyzed and discussed in this study. Since ChatGPT emerged, it has gained a rapidly growing popularity, with more than 600 million users today. The development of ChatGPT was a significant mile-stone, as it demonstrated the potential of large-scale language models to generate natural language responses that are almost indistinguishable from those of a human. ChatGPT's operational principles, prospective applications, and ability to advance a range of human endeavours are discussed in the paper. However, much of the work discusses and poses moral and other problems that rely on the subject. To document the latter, we submitted 14 queries and captured the ChatGPT responses. ChatGPT appeared to be honest, self-knowledgeable, and careful with its answers. The authors come to the realization that since AI is already a part of society, the pervasiveness of the ChatGPT tool to the general public has once again brought to light concerns regarding AI in general. Still, they have moved from the domain of scientific community collective reflection at a conceptual level to everyday practice this time.
ChatGPT:确定不言自明的。人工智能在人类知识生成中的应用
本研究分析和讨论了chatgpt的基本原理、潜在应用和伦理问题。自ChatGPT出现以来,它迅速受到欢迎,目前拥有超过6亿用户。ChatGPT的开发是一个重要的里程碑,因为它展示了大规模语言模型产生与人类几乎无法区分的自然语言响应的潜力。本文讨论了ChatGPT的操作原理、潜在应用以及推进一系列人类努力的能力。然而,许多作品讨论并提出了依赖于这个主题的道德和其他问题。为了记录后者,我们提交了14个查询并捕获了ChatGPT响应。chatgpt看起来很诚实,有自知之明,回答问题也很谨慎。作者意识到,由于人工智能已经成为社会的一部分,ChatGPT工具对普通公众的普及再次引起了人们对人工智能的普遍关注。尽管如此,这一次,他们已经从科学共同体的概念层面的集体反思领域转移到了日常实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信