The influence of dynamic resources and stable isotope incorporation rates on aquatic consumer trophic position estimation

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
Megan L. Feddern, Jens M. Nielsen, Timothy E. Essington, Gordon W. Holtgrieve
{"title":"The influence of dynamic resources and stable isotope incorporation rates on aquatic consumer trophic position estimation","authors":"Megan L. Feddern,&nbsp;Jens M. Nielsen,&nbsp;Timothy E. Essington,&nbsp;Gordon W. Holtgrieve","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A key assumption in trophic position (TP) estimation using stable isotope analysis is that consumers are in isotopic equilibrium with their resources. Here, we assess the degree to which time-varying resource dynamics and isotope incorporation rates of consumers influence consumer TP estimates across multiple trophic levels and aquatic ecosystems. We constructed a first-order kinetics model to explore consumer stable isotope incorporation rates and modeled the effect on TP calculations using bulk and compound-specific stable isotope data from previous experimental and observational studies. We found TP estimates of higher trophic level consumers are less accurate than lower trophic level consumers when applying bulk stable isotope analysis (BSIA) and using particulate organic matter as the stable isotope baseline. The accuracy of TP estimates depended on the time-varying dynamics of the stable isotope baseline. Tertiary consumers had the highest TP estimation error, and this error was not eliminated by sampling tissues with fast incorporation rates (i.e., blood) in the tertiary consumer. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA) of individual amino acids was more accurate in estimating TP for all consumers and ecosystems compared to BSIA. Our analysis confirms that consideration for the dynamic nature of stable isotope ratios is necessary for accurate TP estimates. Finally, we show how first-order kinetics models can provide a useful framework for integrating prey and consumer incorporation rates in stable isotope studies to improve TP estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"22 3","pages":"119-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key assumption in trophic position (TP) estimation using stable isotope analysis is that consumers are in isotopic equilibrium with their resources. Here, we assess the degree to which time-varying resource dynamics and isotope incorporation rates of consumers influence consumer TP estimates across multiple trophic levels and aquatic ecosystems. We constructed a first-order kinetics model to explore consumer stable isotope incorporation rates and modeled the effect on TP calculations using bulk and compound-specific stable isotope data from previous experimental and observational studies. We found TP estimates of higher trophic level consumers are less accurate than lower trophic level consumers when applying bulk stable isotope analysis (BSIA) and using particulate organic matter as the stable isotope baseline. The accuracy of TP estimates depended on the time-varying dynamics of the stable isotope baseline. Tertiary consumers had the highest TP estimation error, and this error was not eliminated by sampling tissues with fast incorporation rates (i.e., blood) in the tertiary consumer. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA) of individual amino acids was more accurate in estimating TP for all consumers and ecosystems compared to BSIA. Our analysis confirms that consideration for the dynamic nature of stable isotope ratios is necessary for accurate TP estimates. Finally, we show how first-order kinetics models can provide a useful framework for integrating prey and consumer incorporation rates in stable isotope studies to improve TP estimates.

动态资源和稳定同位素掺入率对水生消费者营养位置估算的影响
利用稳定同位素分析估算营养位置(TP)的一个关键假设是消费者与其资源处于同位素平衡状态。在这里,我们评估了随时间变化的资源动态和消费者同位素吸收率对不同营养水平和水生生态系统中消费者TP估计的影响程度。我们构建了一个一级动力学模型来探索消费者稳定同位素掺入率,并利用先前实验和观测研究的体积和化合物特异性稳定同位素数据模拟了TP计算的影响。我们发现,当应用体积稳定同位素分析(BSIA)并使用颗粒有机质作为稳定同位素基线时,高营养级消费者的总磷估计比低营养级消费者更不准确。总磷估算的准确性取决于稳定同位素基线的时变动力学。三级消费者的TP估计误差最高,这一误差不能通过对三级消费者体内掺入率快的组织(即血液)取样来消除。与BSIA相比,单个氨基酸的化合物特异性稳定同位素分析(CSIA)在估计所有消费者和生态系统的总磷方面更为准确。我们的分析证实,要准确估计总磷,必须考虑稳定同位素比率的动态性质。最后,我们展示了一阶动力学模型如何在稳定同位素研究中为整合猎物和消费者的结合率提供有用的框架,以改进TP估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信