Exchange on subject pedagogy during lesson study in initial teacher education

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Carien Bakker, Siebrich de Vries, Kees de Glopper
{"title":"Exchange on subject pedagogy during lesson study in initial teacher education","authors":"Carien Bakker, Siebrich de Vries, Kees de Glopper","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-04-2023-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p> This exploratory study investigates the extent to which lesson study (LS) in initial teacher education (ITE) teams address subject-pedagogical aspects during their conversations and what subject-pedagogical aspects are addressed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> The two-case design of the study – one LS team in ITE comprised of an ST and experienced teachers and one comprised of an ST and novice teachers – is aimed to discover similarities and variations in their focus of attention.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p> The conversations of both LS teams were to a large degree about subject-pedagogical aspects. Both teams paid relatively less attention to discussing the themes “subject matter” and “learning objectives” and more to “pupils” learning and “teacher activities.” Concerning the theme of “pupils” learning, the LS team with experienced teachers focused more than the novice LS team on discussing the aspects “pupils” initial situation and “expected learning behavior.” The novice LS team focused more than the experienced team on discussing their observations of individual pupils' thinking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p> The results indicate that LS in ITE with a mix of ST and experienced teachers can facilitate exchange on subject-pedagogical aspects of the research lesson. This may help develop and deepen the subject-pedagogical knowledge, views and routines of STs. The differences found between the two LS teams provide starting points for differentiation in the support of LS teams in ITE. Follow-up research could focus on the questions of whether and how LS teams in ITE bring more coherence to their attention for subject-pedagogical aspects of the lesson.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-04-2023-0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This exploratory study investigates the extent to which lesson study (LS) in initial teacher education (ITE) teams address subject-pedagogical aspects during their conversations and what subject-pedagogical aspects are addressed.

Design/methodology/approach

The two-case design of the study – one LS team in ITE comprised of an ST and experienced teachers and one comprised of an ST and novice teachers – is aimed to discover similarities and variations in their focus of attention.

Findings

The conversations of both LS teams were to a large degree about subject-pedagogical aspects. Both teams paid relatively less attention to discussing the themes “subject matter” and “learning objectives” and more to “pupils” learning and “teacher activities.” Concerning the theme of “pupils” learning, the LS team with experienced teachers focused more than the novice LS team on discussing the aspects “pupils” initial situation and “expected learning behavior.” The novice LS team focused more than the experienced team on discussing their observations of individual pupils' thinking.

Originality/value

The results indicate that LS in ITE with a mix of ST and experienced teachers can facilitate exchange on subject-pedagogical aspects of the research lesson. This may help develop and deepen the subject-pedagogical knowledge, views and routines of STs. The differences found between the two LS teams provide starting points for differentiation in the support of LS teams in ITE. Follow-up research could focus on the questions of whether and how LS teams in ITE bring more coherence to their attention for subject-pedagogical aspects of the lesson.

初级教师教育课程学习中的学科教学法交流
目的:本探索性研究调查了初级教师教育(ITE)团队的课程研究(LS)在对话中涉及主题教学方面的程度,以及涉及哪些主题教学方面。设计/方法/方法本研究的双案例设计——一个由一名技术助理和经验丰富的教师组成,另一个由一名技术助理和新教师组成——旨在发现他们关注焦点的相似之处和差异。两个LS团队的对话在很大程度上是关于学科教学方面的。两个小组相对较少关注讨论主题“主题”和“学习目标”,而更多关注“学生”学习和“教师活动”。在“学生”学习这一主题上,经验丰富的LS团队比新手团队更注重讨论“学生的初始状态”和“预期学习行为”两个方面。与经验丰富的团队相比,初出茅庐的LS团队更注重讨论他们对学生个体思维的观察。原创性/价值研究结果表明,在科技与经验丰富的教师混合的情况下,创新教学可以促进研究性课程的主题教学方面的交流。这有助于发展和深化STs的学科教学知识、观点和惯例。两个LS团队之间发现的差异为LS团队在ITE中的支持区分提供了起点。后续研究可以集中在以下问题上:信息技术学院的LS团队是否以及如何使他们对课程的学科教学方面的注意力更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
46.20%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The first journal of its kind, The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies publishes lesson and learning studies that are pedagogically aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning in formal educational settings. These studies may take the form of action research, design experiments, formative evaluations or pedagogical research more generally that is designed to foster a democratic, discursive and action orientated inquiry process. The editorial objective of the journal is to promote interdisciplinary and cross-national collaboration between groups of teacher educators, educational researchers and schoolteachers. The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies (IJLLS) is the official journal of the World Association of Lesson Studies (WALS). WALS is an association of educational researchers and teaching professionals from various countries in the world who are dedicated to educational research that focuses directly on improving the quality of learning in classrooms and other formal learning environments through pedagogical experiments or action research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信