Multi-Domain Interventions for Dementia Prevention–A Systematic Review

C. B. Castro, L. M. Costa, C. B. Dias, J. Chen, H. Hillebrandt, S. L. Gardener, B. M. Brown, R. L. Loo, M. L. Garg, S. R. Rainey-Smith, Ralph N. Martins, Hamid R. Sohrabi
{"title":"Multi-Domain Interventions for Dementia Prevention–A Systematic Review","authors":"C. B. Castro, L. M. Costa, C. B. Dias, J. Chen, H. Hillebrandt, S. L. Gardener, B. M. Brown, R. L. Loo, M. L. Garg, S. R. Rainey-Smith, Ralph N. Martins, Hamid R. Sohrabi","doi":"10.1007/s12603-023-2046-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>There is a growing incidence of cognitive decline and dementia associated with the ageing population. Lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and cognitive activities may individually or collectively be undertaken to increase one’s odds of preventing cognitive decline and future dementia. This study will examine whether clinical trials using multidomain lifestyle intervention can significantly decrease the risk of cognitive decline and therefore dementia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design, Setting and Participants</h3><p>This systematic literature review of multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia followed the PRISMA guidelines. Clinical trials involving multidomain intervention (i.e., diet and physical activity, or without cognitive training) in older adults (≥ 49 years old) at higher risk of dementia were identified through 5 electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus). A comprehensive search was performed to identify and retrieve publications until 15 November 2022. Trials were published in English.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The included studies (n=15) assessed change in cognition in response to a multidomain lifestyle intervention. However, the cognitive outcome measures used in these studies were heterogeneous. Despite this heterogeneity, two thirds of the studies showed improvement in cognition following a multidomain intervention (n=10 with a total of 9,439 participants). However, five studies reported no improvement in cognition following the multidomain intervention. The most common form of dietary intervention included higher amount of fruit and vegetable intake; whole-grain cereal products instead of refined; low fat options in milk and meat products; and limiting sucrose intake to less than 50 g/day. Most clinical trial studies were powered to examining the effects of multidomain interventions in cognition but were not designed to test the contribution of individual domains (i.e., dietary changes, increased physical activity, or increased cognitive stimulation alone).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of multimodal lifestyle interventions on cognitive outcomes in older adults at risk of dementia. We found that participants with conditions that may increase the risk of dementia, (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular fragility) do benefit from multi-modal lifestyle changes including diet, physical activity, and cognitive training. Two thirds of studies using multidomain lifestyle interventions showed improvements in cognitive function. Trials with a focus on cognitive training, dietary improvement, and physical activity may prevent or delay cognitive decline in older adults including those at risk of developing dementia. Future studies should consider longer follow-up periods and adequate power to be able to examine the effects of each lifestyle component in the context of multimodal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":501202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-023-2046-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

There is a growing incidence of cognitive decline and dementia associated with the ageing population. Lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and cognitive activities may individually or collectively be undertaken to increase one’s odds of preventing cognitive decline and future dementia. This study will examine whether clinical trials using multidomain lifestyle intervention can significantly decrease the risk of cognitive decline and therefore dementia.

Design, Setting and Participants

This systematic literature review of multidomain lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia followed the PRISMA guidelines. Clinical trials involving multidomain intervention (i.e., diet and physical activity, or without cognitive training) in older adults (≥ 49 years old) at higher risk of dementia were identified through 5 electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus). A comprehensive search was performed to identify and retrieve publications until 15 November 2022. Trials were published in English.

Results

The included studies (n=15) assessed change in cognition in response to a multidomain lifestyle intervention. However, the cognitive outcome measures used in these studies were heterogeneous. Despite this heterogeneity, two thirds of the studies showed improvement in cognition following a multidomain intervention (n=10 with a total of 9,439 participants). However, five studies reported no improvement in cognition following the multidomain intervention. The most common form of dietary intervention included higher amount of fruit and vegetable intake; whole-grain cereal products instead of refined; low fat options in milk and meat products; and limiting sucrose intake to less than 50 g/day. Most clinical trial studies were powered to examining the effects of multidomain interventions in cognition but were not designed to test the contribution of individual domains (i.e., dietary changes, increased physical activity, or increased cognitive stimulation alone).

Conclusion

This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of multimodal lifestyle interventions on cognitive outcomes in older adults at risk of dementia. We found that participants with conditions that may increase the risk of dementia, (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular fragility) do benefit from multi-modal lifestyle changes including diet, physical activity, and cognitive training. Two thirds of studies using multidomain lifestyle interventions showed improvements in cognitive function. Trials with a focus on cognitive training, dietary improvement, and physical activity may prevent or delay cognitive decline in older adults including those at risk of developing dementia. Future studies should consider longer follow-up periods and adequate power to be able to examine the effects of each lifestyle component in the context of multimodal interventions.

Abstract Image

痴呆预防的多领域干预——系统综述
目的随着人口老龄化,认知能力下降和痴呆的发病率越来越高。生活方式因素,如饮食、体育活动和认知活动,可以单独或共同进行,以增加预防认知能力下降和未来痴呆的几率。本研究将检验临床试验中使用多领域生活方式干预是否能显著降低认知能力下降和痴呆的风险。设计、环境和参与者遵循PRISMA指南,对预防认知能力下降和痴呆的多领域生活方式干预进行了系统的文献综述。通过5个电子数据库(EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane和Scopus)确定痴呆高风险老年人(≥49岁)涉及多领域干预(即饮食和身体活动,或不进行认知训练)的临床试验。在2022年11月15日之前进行了一次全面检索,以确定和检索出版物。试验用英文发表。结果纳入的研究(n=15)评估了多领域生活方式干预对认知的影响。然而,在这些研究中使用的认知结果测量是异质的。尽管存在这种异质性,但三分之二的研究显示,在多领域干预后,认知能力有所改善(n=10,共9439名参与者)。然而,五项研究报告在多领域干预后认知没有改善。最常见的饮食干预形式包括增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量;全谷类食品代替精制;牛奶和肉类产品的低脂选择;并将蔗糖摄入量限制在每天50克以下。大多数临床试验研究都是为了检查多领域干预对认知的影响,而不是为了测试单个领域(即饮食改变、增加体育活动或单独增加认知刺激)的贡献。结论:本系统综述旨在确定多模式生活方式干预对有痴呆风险的老年人认知结局的影响。我们发现,患有可能增加痴呆风险的疾病(如高血压、心血管脆弱性)的参与者确实受益于多模式生活方式的改变,包括饮食、体育活动和认知训练。三分之二采用多领域生活方式干预的研究显示认知功能有所改善。以认知训练、饮食改善和身体活动为重点的试验可能会预防或延缓老年人的认知能力下降,包括那些有患痴呆症风险的老年人。未来的研究应考虑更长的随访期和足够的能力,以便能够在多模式干预的背景下检查每种生活方式组成部分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信