{"title":"Comparison of gap-based and flow-based control strategies using a new controlled stochastic cellular automaton model for traffic flow","authors":"Kayo Kinjo, Akiyasu Tomoeda","doi":"arxiv-2308.14291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous vehicles are widely considered an imperative element of future\ntransportation systems, and their adoption is expected to reduce traffic\ncongestion. What is an effective vehicle control to reduce it? This study\nexplores the impact of different vehicle control strategies on traffic flow\nthrough simulations. To achieve this, we introduce a novel stochastic traffic\nflow model called the controlled stochastic optimal velocity (CSOV) model,\nwhich incorporates vehicle control effects. Two distinct control strategies are\napplied within the CSOV model: gap-based control (GC) and flow-based control\n(FC). The GC strategy regulates the velocity to equalize the gap between the\nfront and rear vehicles. Conversely, the FC strategy regulates the velocity to\nmaintain a consistent front and rear flow rate. The results show that there\nwere density regions where the GC strategy improved the flow rate. However,\nonly the GC strategy with the weak control resulted in a lower flow rate\ncompared to when there was no control. Conversely, the FC strategy consistently\nimproved the flow rate regardless of control strength, yielding more robust\nresults. Furthermore, when the two controls achieve similar flow rates, the FC\nstrategy provided a more robust velocity distribution for density change than\nthe GC strategy.","PeriodicalId":501231,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2308.14291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles are widely considered an imperative element of future
transportation systems, and their adoption is expected to reduce traffic
congestion. What is an effective vehicle control to reduce it? This study
explores the impact of different vehicle control strategies on traffic flow
through simulations. To achieve this, we introduce a novel stochastic traffic
flow model called the controlled stochastic optimal velocity (CSOV) model,
which incorporates vehicle control effects. Two distinct control strategies are
applied within the CSOV model: gap-based control (GC) and flow-based control
(FC). The GC strategy regulates the velocity to equalize the gap between the
front and rear vehicles. Conversely, the FC strategy regulates the velocity to
maintain a consistent front and rear flow rate. The results show that there
were density regions where the GC strategy improved the flow rate. However,
only the GC strategy with the weak control resulted in a lower flow rate
compared to when there was no control. Conversely, the FC strategy consistently
improved the flow rate regardless of control strength, yielding more robust
results. Furthermore, when the two controls achieve similar flow rates, the FC
strategy provided a more robust velocity distribution for density change than
the GC strategy.