Human adaptation to climate change in the context of forests: A systematic review

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alexandra Paige Fischer , Mohammad Aminur Rahman Shah , Alcade C. Segnon , Custodio Matavel , Philip Antwi-Agyei , Yuanyuan Shang , Maegan Muir , Rachel Kaufmann , The Global Adaptation Mapping Team
{"title":"Human adaptation to climate change in the context of forests: A systematic review","authors":"Alexandra Paige Fischer ,&nbsp;Mohammad Aminur Rahman Shah ,&nbsp;Alcade C. Segnon ,&nbsp;Custodio Matavel ,&nbsp;Philip Antwi-Agyei ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Shang ,&nbsp;Maegan Muir ,&nbsp;Rachel Kaufmann ,&nbsp;The Global Adaptation Mapping Team","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2023.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We assessed how people adapt to climate change in the context of forests through a systematic review of the international empirical research literature. We found that drought, precipitation variability, extreme precipitation and flooding, and extreme heat were the climatic stressors to which responses were most frequently documented. Individuals and households received the most research attention, followed by national government, civil society, and local government. Europe and North America were the geographic foci of more research than other regions. Behavioral responses were more reported than technical and infrastructural responses and institutional responses. Within these types of responses, actors used a wide variety of practices such as replanting, altering species composition, and adopting or changing technology. Adaptation efforts in early planning and advanced implementation received some attention, but early implementation and expanding implementation were most reported. While connections between responses and risk reduction were discussed, there is limited evidence of risk reduction. Our review contributes to the scholarly and practical understanding of how people adapt to climate change in the context of forests. The review also identifies opportunities for future research on adaptation to other climatic stressors, such as wildfires and tree pests and pathogens, adaptation in other geographic areas, especially Oceania, and adaptation by actors beyond the individual and household level and through institutional adaptation efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100573"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096323000992/pdfft?md5=2b59a31305af8bfd3ae7d542382a9466&pid=1-s2.0-S2212096323000992-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096323000992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assessed how people adapt to climate change in the context of forests through a systematic review of the international empirical research literature. We found that drought, precipitation variability, extreme precipitation and flooding, and extreme heat were the climatic stressors to which responses were most frequently documented. Individuals and households received the most research attention, followed by national government, civil society, and local government. Europe and North America were the geographic foci of more research than other regions. Behavioral responses were more reported than technical and infrastructural responses and institutional responses. Within these types of responses, actors used a wide variety of practices such as replanting, altering species composition, and adopting or changing technology. Adaptation efforts in early planning and advanced implementation received some attention, but early implementation and expanding implementation were most reported. While connections between responses and risk reduction were discussed, there is limited evidence of risk reduction. Our review contributes to the scholarly and practical understanding of how people adapt to climate change in the context of forests. The review also identifies opportunities for future research on adaptation to other climatic stressors, such as wildfires and tree pests and pathogens, adaptation in other geographic areas, especially Oceania, and adaptation by actors beyond the individual and household level and through institutional adaptation efforts.

森林背景下人类对气候变化的适应:系统综述
我们通过对国际实证研究文献的系统回顾,评估了人类如何在森林背景下适应气候变化。我们发现,干旱、降水变异性、极端降水和洪水以及极端高温是记录最频繁的气候压力源。个人和家庭受到的研究关注最多,其次是国家政府、公民社会和地方政府。欧洲和北美是研究的地理焦点,比其他地区更多。报告的行为反应多于技术和基础设施反应以及机构反应。在这些类型的响应中,行动者采用了各种各样的做法,如重新种植,改变物种组成,采用或改变技术。早期规划和提前实施方面的适应工作得到了一些关注,但早期实施和扩大实施的报道最多。虽然讨论了应对措施与减少风险之间的联系,但减少风险的证据有限。我们的综述有助于在学术和实践上理解人类如何在森林的背景下适应气候变化。该评估还确定了未来研究适应其他气候压力源(如野火、树木病虫害和病原体)、其他地理区域(特别是大洋洲)的适应以及个人和家庭层面以外行为者的适应以及通过机构适应工作的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climate Risk Management
Climate Risk Management Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term. The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信