Adaptive Driving Assistant Model (ADAM) for Advising Drivers of Autonomous Vehicles

IF 3.6 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Andy R. Wang, Anna Madison, Chad Tossell, Ewart de Visser
{"title":"Adaptive Driving Assistant Model (ADAM) for Advising Drivers of Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Andy R. Wang, Anna Madison, Chad Tossell, Ewart de Visser","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fully autonomous driving is on the horizon; vehicles with <b>advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS)</b> such as Tesla's Autopilot are already available to consumers. However, all currently available ADAS applications require a human driver to be alert and ready to take control if needed. Partially automated driving introduces new complexities to human interactions with cars and can even increase collision risk. A better understanding of drivers’ trust in automation may help reduce these complexities. Much of the existing research on trust in ADAS has relied on use of surveys and physiological measures to assess trust and has been conducted using driving simulators. There have been relatively few studies that use telemetry data from real automated vehicles to assess trust in ADAS. In addition, although some ADAS technologies provide alerts when, for example, drivers’ hands are not on the steering wheel, these systems are not personalized to individual drivers. Needed are adaptive technologies that can help drivers of autonomous vehicles avoid crashes based on multiple real-time data streams. In this paper, we propose an architecture for adaptive autonomous driving assistance. Two layers of multiple sensory fusion models are developed to provide appropriate voice reminders to increase driving safety based on predicted driving status. Results suggest that human trust in automation can be quantified and predicted with 80% accuracy based on vehicle data, and that adaptive speech-based advice can be provided to drivers with 90 to 95% accuracy. With more data, these models can be used to evaluate trust in driving assistance tools, which can ultimately lead to safer and appropriate use of these features.</p>","PeriodicalId":48574,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fully autonomous driving is on the horizon; vehicles with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) such as Tesla's Autopilot are already available to consumers. However, all currently available ADAS applications require a human driver to be alert and ready to take control if needed. Partially automated driving introduces new complexities to human interactions with cars and can even increase collision risk. A better understanding of drivers’ trust in automation may help reduce these complexities. Much of the existing research on trust in ADAS has relied on use of surveys and physiological measures to assess trust and has been conducted using driving simulators. There have been relatively few studies that use telemetry data from real automated vehicles to assess trust in ADAS. In addition, although some ADAS technologies provide alerts when, for example, drivers’ hands are not on the steering wheel, these systems are not personalized to individual drivers. Needed are adaptive technologies that can help drivers of autonomous vehicles avoid crashes based on multiple real-time data streams. In this paper, we propose an architecture for adaptive autonomous driving assistance. Two layers of multiple sensory fusion models are developed to provide appropriate voice reminders to increase driving safety based on predicted driving status. Results suggest that human trust in automation can be quantified and predicted with 80% accuracy based on vehicle data, and that adaptive speech-based advice can be provided to drivers with 90 to 95% accuracy. With more data, these models can be used to evaluate trust in driving assistance tools, which can ultimately lead to safer and appropriate use of these features.

自适应驾驶辅助模型(ADAM)用于自动驾驶车辆的驾驶员建议
完全自动驾驶即将到来;配备先进驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)的汽车,如特斯拉的自动驾驶仪(Autopilot),已经向消费者开放。然而,目前所有可用的ADAS应用程序都要求人类驾驶员保持警惕,并准备在需要时接管控制。部分自动驾驶给人与汽车的互动带来了新的复杂性,甚至可能增加碰撞风险。更好地了解司机对自动化的信任可能有助于减少这些复杂性。现有的许多关于ADAS中信任的研究都依赖于使用调查和生理测量来评估信任,并使用驾驶模拟器进行。使用真实自动驾驶车辆的遥测数据来评估对ADAS的信任的研究相对较少。此外,尽管一些ADAS技术在驾驶员的手不在方向盘上时提供警报,但这些系统并不是针对个别驾驶员的个性化系统。我们需要的是一种自适应技术,能够帮助自动驾驶汽车的驾驶员基于多个实时数据流避免碰撞。在本文中,我们提出了一种自适应自动驾驶辅助体系结构。开发了两层多感官融合模型,根据预测的驾驶状态提供适当的语音提醒,以提高驾驶安全性。结果表明,基于车辆数据,人类对自动化的信任可以量化和预测,准确率为80%,而基于自适应语音的建议可以为驾驶员提供90%至95%的准确率。有了更多的数据,这些模型可以用来评估对驾驶辅助工具的信任,最终可以更安全、更合理地使用这些功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems Computer Science-Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) publishes papers on research concerning the design, realization, or evaluation of interactive systems that incorporate some form of machine intelligence. TIIS articles come from a wide range of research areas and communities. An article can take any of several complementary views of interactive intelligent systems, focusing on: the intelligent technology, the interaction of users with the system, or both aspects at once.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信