Surviving a re-entry: second-career academics in business schools in Malaysia

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Liap-Teck Ong
{"title":"Surviving a re-entry: second-career academics in business schools in Malaysia","authors":"Liap-Teck Ong","doi":"10.1007/s10671-021-09295-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, the re-entry of business executives into academia as second-career academics has become increasingly common. However, very few studies have been carried out to investigate how these second-career academics survive in their new working environment. The current study set out to explore the survival of second-career academics upon their re-entry into academia. A total of 31 s-career academics were recruited from business schools in eight universities in Malaysia. Data were collected via semistructured interviews and focus group discussions. The narratives were supplemented by artefacts collected from the participants. Thematic analysis of the narratives was carried out using the hermeneutical approach. One of the main themes that emerged from the study was the sense of self-efficacy experienced by the participants as a result of their previous industry experience. This perceived self-efficacy empowers these second-career academics in carrying out academic tasks such as teaching, academic research, and industry outreach. Such insights are important for university management to create polices and implement practices that facilitate the transition process and ensure the sustainability of these second-career academics. The finding also highlighted the pivoting role of self-efficacy in surviving a career transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":44841,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-021-09295-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the re-entry of business executives into academia as second-career academics has become increasingly common. However, very few studies have been carried out to investigate how these second-career academics survive in their new working environment. The current study set out to explore the survival of second-career academics upon their re-entry into academia. A total of 31 s-career academics were recruited from business schools in eight universities in Malaysia. Data were collected via semistructured interviews and focus group discussions. The narratives were supplemented by artefacts collected from the participants. Thematic analysis of the narratives was carried out using the hermeneutical approach. One of the main themes that emerged from the study was the sense of self-efficacy experienced by the participants as a result of their previous industry experience. This perceived self-efficacy empowers these second-career academics in carrying out academic tasks such as teaching, academic research, and industry outreach. Such insights are important for university management to create polices and implement practices that facilitate the transition process and ensure the sustainability of these second-career academics. The finding also highlighted the pivoting role of self-efficacy in surviving a career transition.

重新进入:马来西亚商学院的第二职业学者
最近,企业高管以第二职业学者的身份重返学术界的现象越来越普遍。然而,很少有研究调查这些第二职业的学者如何在新的工作环境中生存下来。目前的研究旨在探讨第二职业学者在重返学术界后的生存状况。共从马来西亚8所大学的商学院招募了31名职业学者。通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论收集数据。从参与者那里收集的手工艺品补充了这些叙述。运用解释学方法对叙事进行主题分析。研究中出现的一个主要主题是参与者由于之前的行业经验而经历的自我效能感。这种自我效能感使这些第二职业学者能够执行教学、学术研究和行业拓展等学术任务。这些见解对于大学管理部门制定政策和实施实践非常重要,这些政策和实践有助于促进过渡过程,并确保这些第二职业学者的可持续性。这一发现还强调了自我效能感在职业转型过程中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Educational Research for Policy and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Educational Research for Policy and Practice, the official journal of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association, aims to improve education and educational research in Asia and the Pacific by promoting the dissemination of high quality research which addresses key issues in educational policy and practice. Therefore, priority will be given to research which has generated a substantive result of importance for educational policy and practice; to analyses of global forces, regional trends and national educational reforms; and to studies of key issues in teaching, learning and development - such as the challenges to be faced in learning to live together in what is the largest and most diverse region of the world. With a broad coverage of education in all sectors and levels of education, the Journal seeks to promote the contribution of educational research, both quantitative and qualitative, to system-wide reforms and policy making on the one hand, and to resolving specific problems facing teachers and learners at a particular level of education in the Asia-Pacific region on the other. Education systems worldwide face many common problems as global forces reshape our institutions and lives, while at the same time, the research and problems facing education in Asia and the Pacific reflect its rich cultural and scholarly traditions as well as specific economic and social realities. Educators and researchers can learn from significant investigations, reform programmes, evaluations and case studies of innovations in countries and cultures other than their own. One purpose of this Journal is to make such investigations within the Asian-Pacific region more widely known.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信