Blood and body fluids exposure, post-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in northern Nigeria

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Zubairu Iliyasu, Musa Babashani, Khadija Dantata, Shaheed A. Zakariyyah, Muktar A. Gadanya, Humayra A. Bashir, Auwalu U. Gajida, Muktar H. Aliyu
{"title":"Blood and body fluids exposure, post-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in northern Nigeria","authors":"Zubairu Iliyasu, Musa Babashani, Khadija Dantata, Shaheed A. Zakariyyah, Muktar A. Gadanya, Humayra A. Bashir, Auwalu U. Gajida, Muktar H. Aliyu","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2023.2256063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Introduction </h3><p>In high-HIV burden settings, such as Nigeria, HIV self-testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are often recommended, but not widely practiced. This study aims to identify the predictors of PEP utilization and preferences for HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in Nigeria.</p><h3>Methods </h3><p>A total of 403 healthcare workers from a tertiary hospital in Nigeria completed questionnaires. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from logistic regression models.</p><h3>Results </h3><p>Among the respondents, 141 (35.0%) reported experiencing at least one workplace exposure incident, with 72 (51.1%) of them receiving PEP. The majority of healthcare workers (<i>n</i> = 354, 87.8%) expressed a preference for HIV self-testing over traditional HIV testing and counseling. The occurrence of exposure incidents was predicted by the respondent’s sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.08, female vs. male), age (aOR = 0. 16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.92, &gt;40 vs. &lt;30 years), profession (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.18-4.66, nurse/midwife vs. physician), work unit (aOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.23, obstetrics/gynecology vs. surgery), and previous HIV testing and counseling (aOR = 0.01; 95% Cl: 0.004-0.03, no vs. yes). Respondent’s profession, work unit, and previous HIV testing and counseling independently predicted a preference for HIV self-testing.</p><h3>Conclusion </h3><p>Further exploration of the feasibility of implementing HIV self-testing as an alternative to traditional HIV testing and counseling for workplace exposures is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2023.2256063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In high-HIV burden settings, such as Nigeria, HIV self-testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are often recommended, but not widely practiced. This study aims to identify the predictors of PEP utilization and preferences for HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in Nigeria.

Methods

A total of 403 healthcare workers from a tertiary hospital in Nigeria completed questionnaires. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from logistic regression models.

Results

Among the respondents, 141 (35.0%) reported experiencing at least one workplace exposure incident, with 72 (51.1%) of them receiving PEP. The majority of healthcare workers (n = 354, 87.8%) expressed a preference for HIV self-testing over traditional HIV testing and counseling. The occurrence of exposure incidents was predicted by the respondent’s sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.08, female vs. male), age (aOR = 0. 16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.92, >40 vs. <30 years), profession (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.18-4.66, nurse/midwife vs. physician), work unit (aOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.23, obstetrics/gynecology vs. surgery), and previous HIV testing and counseling (aOR = 0.01; 95% Cl: 0.004-0.03, no vs. yes). Respondent’s profession, work unit, and previous HIV testing and counseling independently predicted a preference for HIV self-testing.

Conclusion

Further exploration of the feasibility of implementing HIV self-testing as an alternative to traditional HIV testing and counseling for workplace exposures is warranted.

尼日利亚北部卫生保健工作者的血液和体液接触、接触后预防和艾滋病毒自我检测
在艾滋病毒高负担环境中,如尼日利亚,艾滋病毒自我检测和接触后预防(PEP)通常被推荐,但并未广泛实施。本研究旨在确定尼日利亚卫生保健工作者PEP使用和艾滋病毒自我检测偏好的预测因素。方法对尼日利亚某三级医院403名医护人员进行问卷调查。调整后的优势比来自逻辑回归模型。结果141人(35.0%)报告至少经历过一次工作场所暴露事件,其中72人(51.1%)接受过PEP。大多数医护人员(n = 3554, 87.8%)表示,与传统的艾滋病毒检测和咨询相比,他们更倾向于进行艾滋病毒自我检测。暴露事件的发生可由被调查者的性别预测(调整后优势比[aOR] = 1.25;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.15-3.08,女性vs.男性),年龄(aOR = 0。16;95% CI: 0.03-0.92, >40 vs <30),职业(aOR = 1.88;95% CI: 1.18-4.66,护士/助产士vs.医生),工作单位(aOR = 0.06;95% CI: 0.02-0.23,产科/妇科与外科),既往HIV检测和咨询(aOR = 0.01;95% Cl: 0.004-0.03, no vs. yes)。被调查者的职业、工作单位、既往HIV检测和咨询独立预测了其HIV自检倾向。结论开展HIV自我检测替代传统HIV检测和工作场所暴露咨询的可行性有待进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信