Strategic investments in entrepreneurial brand ventures by large incumbents

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Deryck J. Van Rensburg, Pete Naudé, Izak Fayena
{"title":"Strategic investments in entrepreneurial brand ventures by large incumbents","authors":"Deryck J. Van Rensburg, Pete Naudé, Izak Fayena","doi":"10.1108/jsma-02-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Consumer product firms renowned for marketing appear to be complementing brand creation, extension and acquisition with minority equity investments in entrepreneurial brand ventures (EBVs) for strategic purposes. Similarly, EBVs are looking for growth and resources that can be accessed via inter-organizational partnerships. This flourishing industry practice and the paucity of empirical research indicates the potential for new studies. The research objective was to examine why and how large incumbents were implementing strategic brand venturing (SBV), and with this understanding to develop a framework useful for descriptive and normative purposes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This qualitative research study comprised in-depth interviews and multiple data sources across seven case studies drawn from US subsidiaries of global firms within the consumer products industry. Grounded in resource theory, the dimensions of strategic brand equity investments are abductively derived.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings delineate 16 process capabilities within four aggregate clusters entailing, the designing of the SBV program, opportunity identification, brand entrepreneur partnerships and venture portfolio management. Prefaced by endogenous and exogenous antecedents, these process capabilities help to contribute strategic and financial value when implemented.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This qualitative research study yielded analytical rather than statistical generalizations. A range of market and economic factors exist in the United States contributing towards a favorable entrepreneurial and brand incubation climate. This may render the SBV concept as contingent and contextual. Furthermore, the view of brand entrepreneurs' regarding the design of the process model were not explicitly sought but inferred from the discourses of the venturing units interviewed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The article outlines several important implementation imperatives for corporations endeavoring to competitively advantage their brand portfolios via adoption of a minority equity investing strategy in EBVs. Practitioners are cautioned against myopically adopting this process alone as a success heuristic given other factors may impact success such as changes in corporate strategy or upper echelon sponsorship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Mission preservation for social brand ventures being tethered to a large incumbent may need to be taken into account prior to and during SBV relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The research contributes to the call for greater insights into the investment processes used in venturing relationships as well as coverage of new industry sectors beyond technology industries that often characterize corporate venture capital studies. Several novel findings emerged related to the importance of—the industry ecosystem; symbiosis between the founding brand entrepreneur and brand culture; synchronization of investment strategies with an emerging brand life-cycle model and serendipitous corporate entrepreneurial opportunities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategy and Management","volume":"37 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-02-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Consumer product firms renowned for marketing appear to be complementing brand creation, extension and acquisition with minority equity investments in entrepreneurial brand ventures (EBVs) for strategic purposes. Similarly, EBVs are looking for growth and resources that can be accessed via inter-organizational partnerships. This flourishing industry practice and the paucity of empirical research indicates the potential for new studies. The research objective was to examine why and how large incumbents were implementing strategic brand venturing (SBV), and with this understanding to develop a framework useful for descriptive and normative purposes.

Design/methodology/approach

This qualitative research study comprised in-depth interviews and multiple data sources across seven case studies drawn from US subsidiaries of global firms within the consumer products industry. Grounded in resource theory, the dimensions of strategic brand equity investments are abductively derived.

Findings

The findings delineate 16 process capabilities within four aggregate clusters entailing, the designing of the SBV program, opportunity identification, brand entrepreneur partnerships and venture portfolio management. Prefaced by endogenous and exogenous antecedents, these process capabilities help to contribute strategic and financial value when implemented.

Research limitations/implications

This qualitative research study yielded analytical rather than statistical generalizations. A range of market and economic factors exist in the United States contributing towards a favorable entrepreneurial and brand incubation climate. This may render the SBV concept as contingent and contextual. Furthermore, the view of brand entrepreneurs' regarding the design of the process model were not explicitly sought but inferred from the discourses of the venturing units interviewed.

Practical implications

The article outlines several important implementation imperatives for corporations endeavoring to competitively advantage their brand portfolios via adoption of a minority equity investing strategy in EBVs. Practitioners are cautioned against myopically adopting this process alone as a success heuristic given other factors may impact success such as changes in corporate strategy or upper echelon sponsorship.

Social implications

Mission preservation for social brand ventures being tethered to a large incumbent may need to be taken into account prior to and during SBV relationships.

Originality/value

The research contributes to the call for greater insights into the investment processes used in venturing relationships as well as coverage of new industry sectors beyond technology industries that often characterize corporate venture capital studies. Several novel findings emerged related to the importance of—the industry ecosystem; symbiosis between the founding brand entrepreneur and brand culture; synchronization of investment strategies with an emerging brand life-cycle model and serendipitous corporate entrepreneurial opportunities.

大型企业对创业品牌企业的战略投资
以营销闻名的消费品公司似乎正在为战略目的补充品牌创建、扩展和收购,并对创业品牌企业(ebv)进行少数股权投资。类似地,ebv正在寻找可以通过组织间伙伴关系访问的增长和资源。这种蓬勃发展的行业实践和实证研究的缺乏表明了新研究的潜力。研究目的是研究大型企业为什么以及如何实施战略品牌冒险(SBV),并根据这种理解开发一个用于描述性和规范性目的的框架。设计/方法/方法本定性研究包括深度访谈和七个案例研究中的多个数据来源,这些案例研究来自消费品行业内全球公司的美国子公司。在资源理论的基础上,战略性品牌资产投资的维度是推导出来的。研究结果描述了四个集群中的16个过程能力,包括SBV计划的设计、机会识别、品牌企业家合作和风险投资组合管理。这些过程能力以内源性和外源性的先决条件为开头,在实施时有助于贡献战略和财务价值。研究局限性/意义本定性研究得出的结论是分析性的,而不是统计性的。美国存在一系列市场和经济因素,有助于形成有利的创业和品牌孵化环境。这可能使SBV概念具有偶然性和情境性。此外,品牌企业家对于流程模型设计的观点并不是明确寻求的,而是从受访创业单位的话语中推断出来的。本文概述了几个重要的实施要求,企业努力通过在ebv中采用少数股权投资策略来获得其品牌组合的竞争优势。鉴于其他因素可能会影响成功,例如公司战略的变化或高层赞助,从业者被告诫不要目光短浅地将这一过程单独作为成功的启发式方法。社会影响社会品牌企业与大型现任企业之间的使命保护可能需要在建立SBV关系之前和期间加以考虑。独创性/价值该研究有助于更深入地了解风险投资关系中使用的投资过程,以及覆盖技术行业之外的新行业部门,这通常是企业风险投资研究的特征。与行业生态系统的重要性相关的一些新发现出现了;品牌创业者与品牌文化的共生关系将投资策略与新兴品牌生命周期模型和偶然的企业创业机会同步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategy and Management is an international journal dedicated to: -improving the existing knowledge and understanding of strategy development and implementation globally in private and public organizations -encouraging new thinking and innovative approaches to the study of strategy -offering executives strategic insights based on outcomes of original scholarly research; and -establishing effective communication between researchers and executives managing public and private organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信