Moving in the presence of others – a systematic review and meta-analysis on social facilitation

IF 6.4 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1080/1750984x.2022.2111663

Edda van Meurs, Jona Greve, Bernd Strauss

{"title":"Moving in the presence of others – a systematic review and meta-analysis on social facilitation","authors":"Edda van Meurs, Jona Greve, Bernd Strauss","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2111663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSocial facilitation is an old research topic in psychology with diverse results: Performance in cognitive or motor tasks is either facilitated, inhibited or not affected, argued to be a function of task complexity. In his narrative review, Strauss, B. (2002. Social facilitation in motor tasks: A review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00019-X) found the presence of others to positively affect condition-based tasks (general drive hypothesis, Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269), and to negatively affect coordination-based tasks (capacity hypothesis, Manstead, A. S. R., & Semin, G. R. (1980). Social facilitation effects: Mere enhancement of dominant responses? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00937.x). This systematic review and meta-analysis focused exclusively on movement-based tasks, identifies the prevalence and magnitude of social facilitation, moderated by condition- and coordination-demands. Through forward searches (Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, ProQuest Dissertations, OvidSP) and backward searches, we identified N = 82 human studies (7008 participants) over 100 years. In the systematic review, condition-based tasks are generally facilitated, while results of coordination-based tasks performed under time and precision pressure differed (cf. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265). The meta-analytic moderator analysis of coordination- and condition-based tasks aligned with the systematic review. The experimenter’s influential presence was emphasized. We support the capacity hypothesis and draw conclusions for the state of the theory and experimental limitations specific to social facilitation research.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2111663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Social facilitation is an old research topic in psychology with diverse results: Performance in cognitive or motor tasks is either facilitated, inhibited or not affected, argued to be a function of task complexity. In his narrative review, Strauss, B. (2002. Social facilitation in motor tasks: A review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00019-X) found the presence of others to positively affect condition-based tasks (general drive hypothesis, Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269), and to negatively affect coordination-based tasks (capacity hypothesis, Manstead, A. S. R., & Semin, G. R. (1980). Social facilitation effects: Mere enhancement of dominant responses? British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00937.x). This systematic review and meta-analysis focused exclusively on movement-based tasks, identifies the prevalence and magnitude of social facilitation, moderated by condition- and coordination-demands. Through forward searches (Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, ProQuest Dissertations, OvidSP) and backward searches, we identified N = 82 human studies (7008 participants) over 100 years. In the systematic review, condition-based tasks are generally facilitated, while results of coordination-based tasks performed under time and precision pressure differed (cf. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265). The meta-analytic moderator analysis of coordination- and condition-based tasks aligned with the systematic review. The experimenter’s influential presence was emphasized. We support the capacity hypothesis and draw conclusions for the state of the theory and experimental limitations specific to social facilitation research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在他人在场的情况下移动——对社会促进的系统回顾和元分析

摘要社会促进是心理学中一个古老的研究课题，其结果多种多样:在认知或运动任务中的表现可能受到促进、抑制或不受影响，这被认为是任务复杂性的函数。在他的叙述回顾，施特劳斯，B.(2002)。运动任务中的社会促进:研究与理论综述。体育心理，3(3)，237-256。https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00019-X)发现其他人的存在会积极影响基于条件的任务(一般驱动假说，Zajonc, R. B.(1965))。社会助长作用。科学，149(3681)，142-146。https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269)，并对基于协调的任务产生负面影响(能力假设，Manstead, a.s.r.， &Semin, G. R.(1980)。社会促进效应:优势反应的单纯增强?心理学报，19(2)，119-135。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00937.x)。这个系统的回顾和荟萃分析专注于基于运动的任务，确定了社会促进的普遍性和规模，由条件和协调需求调节。通过正向检索(Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, ProQuest Dissertations, OvidSP)和反向检索，我们确定了100多年来N = 82项人类研究(7008名参与者)。在系统回顾中，基于条件的任务通常更容易完成，而基于协调的任务在时间和精度压力下执行的结果不同(参见Bond, c.f.， &提图斯(1983)。社会促进:241项研究的荟萃分析。心理学报，1994(2)，265-292。https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265)。基于协调和条件的任务的元分析调节分析与系统评价一致。实验者的影响力被强调了。我们支持能力假说，并对社会促进研究的理论现状和实验局限性进行了总结。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

17.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology is the first scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes critical reviews of research literature in sport and exercise psychology. Typically, these reviews evaluate relevant conceptual and methodological issues in the field and provide a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of empirical studies that address common themes or hypotheses. The reviews present summaries of, and conclusions about, the current state of knowledge concerning topics of interest, as well as assessments of relevant unresolved issues and future trends. Reviews of research literature on theories, topics and issues that are at the interface with mainstream psychology are especially welcome.