Psychological readiness to return to sport following injury: a state-of-the-art review

IF 6.4 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1080/1750984x.2022.2081929

Leslie Podlog, Ross Wadey, Jeff Caron, John J. Fraser, Andreas Ivarsson, John Heil, Stefanie Podlog, Tallie Casucci

{"title":"Psychological readiness to return to sport following injury: a state-of-the-art review","authors":"Leslie Podlog, Ross Wadey, Jeff Caron, John J. Fraser, Andreas Ivarsson, John Heil, Stefanie Podlog, Tallie Casucci","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2022.2081929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPsychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after injury is a critical and timely area of research that has received significant research attention of late. Although research on psychological readiness to RTS has burgeoned in recent years, there remains a lack of conceptual clarity on what psychological readiness is. As such, our aims in this review of the state of the art (consistent with the typology of Grant and Booth) are threefold. First, we articulate key conceptual issues and questions regarding the nature of psychological readiness and offer a preliminary nomothetic definition of the construct. Based on the definition, we advance several hypotheses for testing in future research. Second, we discuss research examining correlates of psychological readiness and, third, we look at empirical work focused on outcomes of psychological readiness. Our review draws upon literature spanning various disciplines and cultures/languages.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2022.2081929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after injury is a critical and timely area of research that has received significant research attention of late. Although research on psychological readiness to RTS has burgeoned in recent years, there remains a lack of conceptual clarity on what psychological readiness is. As such, our aims in this review of the state of the art (consistent with the typology of Grant and Booth) are threefold. First, we articulate key conceptual issues and questions regarding the nature of psychological readiness and offer a preliminary nomothetic definition of the construct. Based on the definition, we advance several hypotheses for testing in future research. Second, we discuss research examining correlates of psychological readiness and, third, we look at empirical work focused on outcomes of psychological readiness. Our review draws upon literature spanning various disciplines and cultures/languages.

查看原文本刊更多论文

受伤后重返运动的心理准备:最先进的回顾

摘要受伤后重返运动的心理准备(RTS)是一个重要而及时的研究领域，近年来受到了广泛的关注。尽管近年来关于RTS心理准备的研究不断涌现，但对于什么是心理准备仍然缺乏清晰的概念。因此，我们对艺术现状的回顾(与Grant和Booth的类型学一致)有三个目的。首先，我们阐明了关于心理准备的本质的关键概念问题和问题，并提供了一个初步的构念法定义。在此基础上，我们提出了几个假设，以供未来研究检验。其次，我们讨论了心理准备相关的研究，第三，我们关注了心理准备结果的实证工作。我们的综述借鉴了跨越不同学科和文化/语言的文献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

17.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology is the first scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes critical reviews of research literature in sport and exercise psychology. Typically, these reviews evaluate relevant conceptual and methodological issues in the field and provide a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of empirical studies that address common themes or hypotheses. The reviews present summaries of, and conclusions about, the current state of knowledge concerning topics of interest, as well as assessments of relevant unresolved issues and future trends. Reviews of research literature on theories, topics and issues that are at the interface with mainstream psychology are especially welcome.