The social life of digital methods in psychology: Situating digital methods in the new data politics

IF 4.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jeffery Yen
{"title":"The social life of digital methods in psychology: Situating digital methods in the new data politics","authors":"Jeffery Yen","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I present some preliminary analyses of what is at stake in the growing use of digital methods in psychology. Their exponential rise in the discipline has scientific consequences, because such methods embody unarticulated assumptions that derive from their cultural, technical, or commercial origins. Such methods also rearticulate researcher-participant relations in new ways, and reframe what it means to take part in psychological research. Additionally, strong calls for psychologists to exploit the potentials of Big Data to analyze and influence human action in real time signal the growing entanglement of psychology, computer science, and the accumulative tactics of the digital economy. As part of a larger project to trace the <i>social life of digital methods</i> in psychology, my aim here is to link disparate literature in psychology, science and technology studies, and critical data studies, to situate such methods in the broader context of technologically afforded shifts in modes of economic and knowledge production. I argue that digital methods are in urgent need of analysis, not only in terms of the interpretive frames, modes of participation, and courses of action they afford, but as research <i>media</i> that circulate in a larger digital and political economic ecosystem, and with associations that span multiple sociotechnical assemblages.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":"21 4-5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I present some preliminary analyses of what is at stake in the growing use of digital methods in psychology. Their exponential rise in the discipline has scientific consequences, because such methods embody unarticulated assumptions that derive from their cultural, technical, or commercial origins. Such methods also rearticulate researcher-participant relations in new ways, and reframe what it means to take part in psychological research. Additionally, strong calls for psychologists to exploit the potentials of Big Data to analyze and influence human action in real time signal the growing entanglement of psychology, computer science, and the accumulative tactics of the digital economy. As part of a larger project to trace the social life of digital methods in psychology, my aim here is to link disparate literature in psychology, science and technology studies, and critical data studies, to situate such methods in the broader context of technologically afforded shifts in modes of economic and knowledge production. I argue that digital methods are in urgent need of analysis, not only in terms of the interpretive frames, modes of participation, and courses of action they afford, but as research media that circulate in a larger digital and political economic ecosystem, and with associations that span multiple sociotechnical assemblages.
心理学中数字方法的社会生活:将数字方法置于新数据政治中
在这篇论文中,我提出了一些初步的分析,分析了在心理学中越来越多地使用数字方法所带来的风险。它们在学科中的指数级增长具有科学后果,因为这些方法体现了源自其文化、技术或商业起源的未明确的假设。这些方法也以新的方式重新阐述了研究者与参与者的关系,并重新定义了参与心理学研究的意义。此外,强烈要求心理学家利用大数据的潜力来实时分析和影响人类行为的呼声表明,心理学、计算机科学和数字经济的累积策略之间的纠缠日益紧密。作为追踪心理学中数字方法的社会生活的更大项目的一部分,我在这里的目标是将心理学、科学技术研究和关键数据研究方面的不同文献联系起来,将这些方法置于技术提供的经济和知识生产模式转变的更广泛背景下。我认为,数字方法迫切需要分析,不仅是在它们提供的解释框架、参与模式和行动方案方面,而且是作为在更大的数字和政治经济生态系统中流通的研究媒介,并与跨越多个社会技术组合的协会联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信