Techno-bio-politics. On Interfacing Life with and Through Technology

IF 1.1 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Benjamin Lipp, Sabine Maasen
{"title":"Techno-bio-politics. On Interfacing Life with and Through Technology","authors":"Benjamin Lipp, Sabine Maasen","doi":"10.1007/s11569-022-00413-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technology takes an unprecedented position in contemporary society. In particular, it has become part and parcel of governmental attempts to manufacture life in new ways. Such ideas concerning the (self-)governance of life organize around the same contention: that technology and life are, in fact, highly <i>interconnectable</i>. This is surprising because if one enters the sites of techno-scientific experimentation, those visions turn out to be much frailer and by no means “in place” yet. Rather, they afford or enforce constant <i>interfacing</i> work, a particular mode of manufacturing life, rendering disparate, sturdy, and often surprisingly incompatible things available for one another. Here, we contend that both of those aspects, pervasive rationalities of interconnectability and practices of interfacing mark the cornerstones of what we call a new(ly articulated) <i>techno-bio-politics of life</i>. In order to grasp the government of life under the technological condition, we must understand <i>how both human and non-human entities are being rendered interconnectable and re-worked through practices of interfacing</i>. We take neuro-technology and care robotics as two illustrative cases. Our analysis shows that the contemporary government of life is not primarily concerned with life itself in its biological re-constitution but rather with life as it is interfaced with and through technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":18802,"journal":{"name":"Nanoethics","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-022-00413-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Technology takes an unprecedented position in contemporary society. In particular, it has become part and parcel of governmental attempts to manufacture life in new ways. Such ideas concerning the (self-)governance of life organize around the same contention: that technology and life are, in fact, highly interconnectable. This is surprising because if one enters the sites of techno-scientific experimentation, those visions turn out to be much frailer and by no means “in place” yet. Rather, they afford or enforce constant interfacing work, a particular mode of manufacturing life, rendering disparate, sturdy, and often surprisingly incompatible things available for one another. Here, we contend that both of those aspects, pervasive rationalities of interconnectability and practices of interfacing mark the cornerstones of what we call a new(ly articulated) techno-bio-politics of life. In order to grasp the government of life under the technological condition, we must understand how both human and non-human entities are being rendered interconnectable and re-worked through practices of interfacing. We take neuro-technology and care robotics as two illustrative cases. Our analysis shows that the contemporary government of life is not primarily concerned with life itself in its biological re-constitution but rather with life as it is interfaced with and through technology.

Techno-bio-politics。关于生活与技术的交互
科技在当代社会中占据着前所未有的地位。特别是,它已成为政府试图以新方式制造生活的重要组成部分。这些关于生命(自我)管理的想法围绕着同样的论点:技术和生命实际上是高度相互联系的。这是令人惊讶的,因为如果一个人进入技术科学实验的场所,这些愿景就会变得更加脆弱,而且绝不是“到位”的。相反,它们提供或执行恒定的接口工作,这是制造生命的一种特殊模式,使不同的、坚固的、经常令人惊讶地不兼容的东西彼此可用。在这里,我们认为这两个方面,互联性的普遍合理性和接口实践标志着我们所谓的新的(明确的)生命技术-生物政治的基石。为了掌握技术条件下的生命治理,我们必须了解人类和非人类实体是如何通过接口实践实现相互连接和重新工作的。我们以神经技术和护理机器人为例。我们的分析表明,当代生命管理主要关注的不是生命本身的生物重构,而是与技术相结合并通过技术实现的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nanoethics
Nanoethics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: NanoEthics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale will focus on the philosophically and scientifically rigorous examination of the ethical and societal considerations and the public and policy concerns inherent in nanotechnology research and development. These issues include both individual and societal problems, and include individual health, wellbeing and human enhancement, human integrity and autonomy, distribution of the costs and benefits, threats to culture and tradition and to political and economic stability. Additionally there are meta-issues including the neutrality or otherwise of technology, designing technology in a value-sensitive way, and the control of scientific research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信