Mapping sustainability practices in the healthcare sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda

IF 8.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Nazish Rahat, Shalini Sahni, Saboohi Nasim
{"title":"Mapping sustainability practices in the healthcare sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda","authors":"Nazish Rahat,&nbsp;Shalini Sahni,&nbsp;Saboohi Nasim","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.12997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustainable healthcare means providing affordable, quality medical care without causing undue environmental damage, which is critical for a world just emerging from a debilitating pandemic. This article contends that it is now an opportune time to map the existing knowledge to guide future sustainability research in healthcare. Therefore, this article aims to systematically review and comprehensively analyse the extant literature on sustainability practices in healthcare organizations and propose future research directions based on gaps in the literature. A corpus of 79 articles sourced from five databases and published between 1995 and 2022 was identified for an in-depth review. Following a framework-based systematic literature review, this article offers an organized, retrospective view of the performance using antecedents, decisions, and outcomes (ADO) and Theories–Contexts–Methods (TCM) integrated framework. These frameworks are used to evaluate and understand sustainability practices in the healthcare sector. Additionally, the article shows the thematic evolution of sustainability research in healthcare with the help of five clusters. While the systematic literature review results highlight the large theoretical base, it also reveals the lack of consensus on defining sustainability. The analysis of 79 articles yielded six valuable categories of antecedents with 27 constructs, five categories of decisions with 11 constructs, and two categories of outcomes with 15 constructs. Results also reveal a lack of consensus regarding the influence of sustainability practices on organizational performance across the three sustainability pillars (social, environmental, and economic dimensions). The present review has implications for healthcare service delivery systems and policymakers to help them redesign their services to promote sustainable development goals. Before concluding the article, knowledge gaps and future research directions are structured using the ADO-TCM framework through pertinent ideas for sustainability research in healthcare organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.12997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable healthcare means providing affordable, quality medical care without causing undue environmental damage, which is critical for a world just emerging from a debilitating pandemic. This article contends that it is now an opportune time to map the existing knowledge to guide future sustainability research in healthcare. Therefore, this article aims to systematically review and comprehensively analyse the extant literature on sustainability practices in healthcare organizations and propose future research directions based on gaps in the literature. A corpus of 79 articles sourced from five databases and published between 1995 and 2022 was identified for an in-depth review. Following a framework-based systematic literature review, this article offers an organized, retrospective view of the performance using antecedents, decisions, and outcomes (ADO) and Theories–Contexts–Methods (TCM) integrated framework. These frameworks are used to evaluate and understand sustainability practices in the healthcare sector. Additionally, the article shows the thematic evolution of sustainability research in healthcare with the help of five clusters. While the systematic literature review results highlight the large theoretical base, it also reveals the lack of consensus on defining sustainability. The analysis of 79 articles yielded six valuable categories of antecedents with 27 constructs, five categories of decisions with 11 constructs, and two categories of outcomes with 15 constructs. Results also reveal a lack of consensus regarding the influence of sustainability practices on organizational performance across the three sustainability pillars (social, environmental, and economic dimensions). The present review has implications for healthcare service delivery systems and policymakers to help them redesign their services to promote sustainable development goals. Before concluding the article, knowledge gaps and future research directions are structured using the ADO-TCM framework through pertinent ideas for sustainability research in healthcare organizations.

绘制可持续性实践在医疗保健部门:系统的文献综述和未来的研究议程
可持续卫生保健意味着提供负担得起的优质医疗服务,而不会造成不适当的环境破坏,这对于刚刚摆脱一场使人衰弱的大流行的世界至关重要。本文认为,现在是绘制现有知识以指导未来医疗保健可持续性研究的合适时机。因此,本文旨在系统回顾和全面分析现有关于医疗机构可持续发展实践的文献,并根据文献中的空白提出未来的研究方向。从1995年至2022年期间发表的5个数据库中选取了79篇文章作为语料库进行深入审查。在基于框架的系统文献综述之后,本文采用前因、决策和结果(ADO)和理论-背景-方法(TCM)集成框架,对绩效进行了有组织的回顾性分析。这些框架用于评估和理解医疗保健部门的可持续性实践。此外,本文还借助五个集群展示了医疗保健可持续性研究的专题演变。虽然系统的文献综述结果突出了庞大的理论基础,但也揭示了对可持续性的定义缺乏共识。对79篇文章的分析产生了6类有价值的27个构念的前词,5类有11个构念的决定,以及2类有15个构念的结果。研究结果还表明,在可持续发展的三个支柱(社会、环境和经济维度)中,可持续发展实践对组织绩效的影响缺乏共识。本综述对卫生保健服务提供系统和政策制定者具有启示意义,可帮助他们重新设计服务以促进可持续发展目标。在结束本文之前,通过医疗机构可持续性研究的相关思想,使用ADO-TCM框架构建知识缺口和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信