Does the sharing of leadership increase the coherence of a school's instructional framework?

IF 2.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Xi Zhan, Roger Goddard, Anika Anthony
{"title":"Does the sharing of leadership increase the coherence of a school's instructional framework?","authors":"Xi Zhan, Roger Goddard, Anika Anthony","doi":"10.1108/ijem-03-2023-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Existing research suggests that organizational learning, jointly implemented by principals and teachers may reduce agency risks and improve school management effectiveness. However, research investigating how this process occurs is lacking. The relationship between school leaders promoting the involvement of teachers in school-wide processes focused on instructional improvement and the coherence characterizing a school's instructional program remains unclear.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors identified shared instructional leadership and instructional coherence, as two key variables describing the process of organizational learning and the outcome of agency risk reduction. The authors employed hierarchical linear modeling to test the hypothesis that shared leaderships positively predicts differences among schools in instructional coherence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Based on a sample of 113 public high schools selected from a U.S. Midwestern state, the results confirm the hypothesis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study uses the existing theoretical and empirical findings to interpret the potential relationship between shared leadership and instructional coherence, and validates it through empirical data analysis. The findings expand the understanding of the shared leadership theory. Although the design of this study is strictly based on theoretical and empirical findings, and part of the purpose of the research is to find the reasons why shared leadership seems to be insignificant in some countries and regions, readers should still note that the sample source is American schools. The findings of this study are worth examining with different samples in future studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Since the direct relationship between shared leadership and student standardized test scores has been difficult to measure, and in some countries even negative, there is debate about the need for shared leadership. The difficulty of measurement is caused by the diversity of leadership subjects and the complexity of leadership tasks. This study finds out the direct object of shared leadership and the process of exerting its effects, which will expand the understanding of the positive meaning of shared leadership. This will help different countries and regions better identify and play the role of shared leadership.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Based on the combination of organizational learning theory, agency theory and shared leadership theory, the study modeled the process of collaborative organizational learning among principals and teachers. The study employed instructional coherence as a form of structured organizational learning that is a prerequisite for improvement in common measures of student learning such as standardized test scores. Do so provide practical guidance for educators seeking improvement through organizational learning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Management","volume":"156 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-03-2023-0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Existing research suggests that organizational learning, jointly implemented by principals and teachers may reduce agency risks and improve school management effectiveness. However, research investigating how this process occurs is lacking. The relationship between school leaders promoting the involvement of teachers in school-wide processes focused on instructional improvement and the coherence characterizing a school's instructional program remains unclear.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors identified shared instructional leadership and instructional coherence, as two key variables describing the process of organizational learning and the outcome of agency risk reduction. The authors employed hierarchical linear modeling to test the hypothesis that shared leaderships positively predicts differences among schools in instructional coherence.

Findings

Based on a sample of 113 public high schools selected from a U.S. Midwestern state, the results confirm the hypothesis.

Research limitations/implications

This study uses the existing theoretical and empirical findings to interpret the potential relationship between shared leadership and instructional coherence, and validates it through empirical data analysis. The findings expand the understanding of the shared leadership theory. Although the design of this study is strictly based on theoretical and empirical findings, and part of the purpose of the research is to find the reasons why shared leadership seems to be insignificant in some countries and regions, readers should still note that the sample source is American schools. The findings of this study are worth examining with different samples in future studies.

Practical implications

Since the direct relationship between shared leadership and student standardized test scores has been difficult to measure, and in some countries even negative, there is debate about the need for shared leadership. The difficulty of measurement is caused by the diversity of leadership subjects and the complexity of leadership tasks. This study finds out the direct object of shared leadership and the process of exerting its effects, which will expand the understanding of the positive meaning of shared leadership. This will help different countries and regions better identify and play the role of shared leadership.

Originality/value

Based on the combination of organizational learning theory, agency theory and shared leadership theory, the study modeled the process of collaborative organizational learning among principals and teachers. The study employed instructional coherence as a form of structured organizational learning that is a prerequisite for improvement in common measures of student learning such as standardized test scores. Do so provide practical guidance for educators seeking improvement through organizational learning.

领导权的共享是否增加了学校教学框架的一致性?
目的已有研究表明,校长与教师共同实施组织学习可以降低代理风险,提高学校管理效能。然而,关于这一过程如何发生的研究是缺乏的。学校领导促进教师参与全校范围的教学改进过程与学校教学计划的一致性之间的关系尚不清楚。设计/方法/方法作者将共享教学领导力和教学一致性确定为描述组织学习过程和代理风险降低结果的两个关键变量。作者采用层次线性模型来检验共享领导对学校间教学一致性差异的正向预测假设。研究结果基于从美国中西部一个州选出的113所公立高中的样本,结果证实了这一假设。本研究利用已有的理论和实证研究结果,解释了共享领导与教学连贯之间的潜在关系,并通过实证数据分析对其进行了验证。研究结果拓展了对共享领导理论的理解。尽管本研究的设计严格基于理论和实证研究结果,并且研究的部分目的是为了找到为什么共享领导在一些国家和地区似乎不重要的原因,但读者仍然应该注意到样本来源是美国学校。本研究的结果值得在未来的研究中以不同的样本进行检验。由于共同领导和学生标准化考试成绩之间的直接关系很难衡量,在一些国家甚至是负的关系,所以关于共同领导的必要性存在争论。测量的困难是由领导主体的多样性和领导任务的复杂性造成的。本研究找出了共享领导的直接对象和发挥作用的过程,这将扩大对共享领导积极意义的理解。这将有助于不同国家和地区更好地认识和发挥共同领导作用。原创性/价值本研究结合组织学习理论、代理理论和共享领导理论,对校长和教师之间的组织协作学习过程进行了建模。该研究将教学连贯性作为一种结构化组织学习的形式,它是提高学生学习的通用衡量标准(如标准化考试成绩)的先决条件。为教育工作者通过组织学习寻求改进提供实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Management (IJEM) provides those interested in the effective management of the educational process with a broad overview of developments and best practice in the field, with particular reference to how new ideas can be applied worldwide. As the whole structure and philosophy of education goes through a sea-change, and as budgets are cut, educational managers need to keep abreast of new developments in order to maximize their resources and determine the most appropriate management strategy for their institution. The journal explores research in the following areas: -Innovation in educational management across the spectrum -The development of educational delivery mechanisms -Creation of an environment in which the management of resources provides the most efficient outputs -Sharing of new initiatives, with an international application The International Journal of Educational Management addresses the increasingly complex role of the educational manager, offering international perspectives on common problems and providing a forum for the sharing of ideas, information and expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信