Plant functional composition as an effective surrogate for biodiversity conservation

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ji-Zhong Wan , Loïc Pellissier , Chun-Jing Wang , Fei-Hai Yu , Mai-He Li
{"title":"Plant functional composition as an effective surrogate for biodiversity conservation","authors":"Ji-Zhong Wan ,&nbsp;Loïc Pellissier ,&nbsp;Chun-Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Fei-Hai Yu ,&nbsp;Mai-He Li","doi":"10.1016/j.baae.2023.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In biodiversity conservation frameworks, determining surrogates for biodiversity is crucial for improving the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation and management. As plant functional composition can indicate variations in ecosystem functions and services, it could be used as an effective surrogate in biodiversity conservation planning. However, to the best of our knowledge, this metric has been rarely used in biodiversity conservation planning. To explore whether plant functional composition can be used as an effective surrogate for biodiversity conservation, we used a linear mixed regression model to investigate the relationships between plant functional composition (i.e., community-weighted means (CWMs) from the sPlot database) and the species richness of birds, mammals, and amphibians, and between plant functional composition and terrestrial conservation priority ranks (considering biodiversity conservation alone, or biodiversity, carbon, and water conservation together). Thereafter, we quantified the changing trends in these relationships across biomes using the least square method. We found that CWMs significantly affected species richness and terrestrial conservation priority ranks, based on the marginal R<sup>2</sup> and conditional R<sup>2</sup> values from the linear mixed regression model. Further, CWMs significantly affected species richness and terrestrial conservation priority ranks across different biomes of forests and shrublands. However, the nature of these effects (i.e., positive or negative) was dependent on biome type. These results suggest that functional composition can be considered as a biodiversity surrogate for conservation planning, and that biome-specific relationships should be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8708,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Ecology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179123000683/pdfft?md5=2c240afa5bba86f989d64a1b38e9cd89&pid=1-s2.0-S1439179123000683-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179123000683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In biodiversity conservation frameworks, determining surrogates for biodiversity is crucial for improving the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation and management. As plant functional composition can indicate variations in ecosystem functions and services, it could be used as an effective surrogate in biodiversity conservation planning. However, to the best of our knowledge, this metric has been rarely used in biodiversity conservation planning. To explore whether plant functional composition can be used as an effective surrogate for biodiversity conservation, we used a linear mixed regression model to investigate the relationships between plant functional composition (i.e., community-weighted means (CWMs) from the sPlot database) and the species richness of birds, mammals, and amphibians, and between plant functional composition and terrestrial conservation priority ranks (considering biodiversity conservation alone, or biodiversity, carbon, and water conservation together). Thereafter, we quantified the changing trends in these relationships across biomes using the least square method. We found that CWMs significantly affected species richness and terrestrial conservation priority ranks, based on the marginal R2 and conditional R2 values from the linear mixed regression model. Further, CWMs significantly affected species richness and terrestrial conservation priority ranks across different biomes of forests and shrublands. However, the nature of these effects (i.e., positive or negative) was dependent on biome type. These results suggest that functional composition can be considered as a biodiversity surrogate for conservation planning, and that biome-specific relationships should be considered.

植物功能组成作为生物多样性保护的有效替代物
在生物多样性保护框架中,确定生物多样性的替代品对于提高生物多样性保护和管理的有效性至关重要。植物功能组成能反映生态系统功能和服务功能的变化,可作为生物多样性保护规划的有效指标。然而,据我们所知,这一指标在生物多样性保护规划中的应用相当有限。为了探索植物功能组成是否可以作为生物多样性保护的有效替代指标,我们使用线性混合回归模型研究了植物功能组成(即sPlot数据库中的群落加权平均值(CWMs))与鸟类、哺乳动物和两栖动物物种丰富度之间的关系,以及植物功能组成与陆地保护优先级之间的关系(仅考虑生物多样性保护,或生物多样性)。碳,和节约用水)。然后,我们用最小二乘法量化了这些关系在不同生物群系间的变化趋势。基于线性混合回归模型的边际R2和条件R2值,我们发现CWMs显著影响物种丰富度和陆地保护优先级。此外,CWMs显著影响了森林和灌丛不同生物群系的物种丰富度和陆地保护优先级。然而,这些影响的性质(即积极或消极)取决于生物群系类型。这些结果表明,功能组成可以作为保护规划的生物多样性替代品,但应考虑生物群系特异性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basic and Applied Ecology
Basic and Applied Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
10.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Applied Ecology provides a forum in which significant advances and ideas can be rapidly communicated to a wide audience. Basic and Applied Ecology publishes original contributions, perspectives and reviews from all areas of basic and applied ecology. Ecologists from all countries are invited to publish ecological research of international interest in its pages. There is no bias with regard to taxon or geographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信