{"title":"Time-worn pebbles or unpolished gemstones? (Un)usable pasts and possible futures of comparative education","authors":"Min Ji Kim","doi":"10.1080/03050068.2023.2240208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b><b>ABSTRACT</b></b></p><p>This article draws on the contributions to this special issue to highlight the urgent need to restore checks and balances in our evaluation of ‘usable pasts’ in comparative education. Considering that our reading of the field’s history not only moulds our understanding of comparative education now but also shapes our imagination of its potential futures, reflecting our implicit biases and the way we construct and narrate its history becomes imperative. This article unveils the persistence of silences and exclusions concerning specific histories, countries, and topics, and highlights the possible influence of evolving geopolitical power dynamics on the future of comparative education. Consequently, it urges critical examination of the field’s positionality amid shifting geopolitical tensions and calls for a thorough scrutiny of entrenched silences and the reductionist use of sweeping policy signifiers such as globalisation, decolonisation, excellence, and the notion of ‘future’ as explanatory concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47655,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education","volume":"78 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2023.2240208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This article draws on the contributions to this special issue to highlight the urgent need to restore checks and balances in our evaluation of ‘usable pasts’ in comparative education. Considering that our reading of the field’s history not only moulds our understanding of comparative education now but also shapes our imagination of its potential futures, reflecting our implicit biases and the way we construct and narrate its history becomes imperative. This article unveils the persistence of silences and exclusions concerning specific histories, countries, and topics, and highlights the possible influence of evolving geopolitical power dynamics on the future of comparative education. Consequently, it urges critical examination of the field’s positionality amid shifting geopolitical tensions and calls for a thorough scrutiny of entrenched silences and the reductionist use of sweeping policy signifiers such as globalisation, decolonisation, excellence, and the notion of ‘future’ as explanatory concepts.
期刊介绍：
This international journal of educational studies presents up-to-date information with analyses of significant problems and trends throughout the world. Comparative Education engages with challenging theoretical and methodological issues - and also considers the implications of comparative studies for the formation and implementation of policies - not only in education but in social, national and international development. Thus it welcomes contributions from associated disciplines in the fields of government, management, sociology - and indeed technology and communications - as these affect educational research and policy decisions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
