IVF stimulation protocols and outcomes in women with endometriosis

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Eduardo Goyri , Graciela Kohls , Juan Garcia-Velasco
{"title":"IVF stimulation protocols and outcomes in women with endometriosis","authors":"Eduardo Goyri ,&nbsp;Graciela Kohls ,&nbsp;Juan Garcia-Velasco","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Endometriosis<span> is a complex medical condition with a high prevalence in women of reproductive age. Fertility is compromised in patients<span><span> with endometriosis, and success in IVF<span> treatments has been a challenge leading to evaluation of different stimulation protocols. The long-standing debate between GnRH agonist long protocols and short GnRH antagonist protocols is being resolved in favor of the latter, since in addition to presenting equivalent results with respect to the traditional option, they have the additional benefit of safety. The good results derived from vitrification techniques have led to the development of new stimulation strategies, such as progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS), with a greater degree of approval among patients. None of the stimulation protocols currently applied in women with endometriosis has been shown to be superior, so early intervention with an </span></span>Assisted Reproduction treatment, regardless of the chosen protocol, can provide these women with good chances of motherhood. Women with </span></span></span>endometrioma<span> should be counseled for fertility preservation before planned ovarian endometrioma excision. The number of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos can be increased by repeated cycles.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693423001360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endometriosis is a complex medical condition with a high prevalence in women of reproductive age. Fertility is compromised in patients with endometriosis, and success in IVF treatments has been a challenge leading to evaluation of different stimulation protocols. The long-standing debate between GnRH agonist long protocols and short GnRH antagonist protocols is being resolved in favor of the latter, since in addition to presenting equivalent results with respect to the traditional option, they have the additional benefit of safety. The good results derived from vitrification techniques have led to the development of new stimulation strategies, such as progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS), with a greater degree of approval among patients. None of the stimulation protocols currently applied in women with endometriosis has been shown to be superior, so early intervention with an Assisted Reproduction treatment, regardless of the chosen protocol, can provide these women with good chances of motherhood. Women with endometrioma should be counseled for fertility preservation before planned ovarian endometrioma excision. The number of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos can be increased by repeated cycles.

子宫内膜异位症妇女的体外受精刺激方案和结果
子宫内膜异位症是一种复杂的疾病,在育龄妇女中发病率很高。子宫内膜异位症患者的生育能力受到损害,体外受精治疗的成功一直是一个挑战,导致对不同刺激方案的评估。长期以来关于GnRH激动剂长期方案和短期GnRH拮抗剂方案之间的争论正在得到解决,支持后者,因为除了提供与传统方案相同的结果外,它们还具有安全性的额外好处。玻璃化技术的良好效果导致了新的刺激策略的发展,如黄体酮刺激卵巢(PPOS),在患者中得到了更大程度的认可。目前用于子宫内膜异位症女性的任何刺激方案都没有表现出优势,因此,无论选择哪种方案,早期干预辅助生殖治疗都可以为这些女性提供良好的生育机会。患有子宫内膜异位瘤的妇女在计划切除卵巢子宫内膜异位瘤之前应建议保留生育能力。冷冻保存的卵母细胞或胚胎的数量可以通过重复循环来增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
113
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology. All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信