Neurocognitive risk phenotyping to predict mood symptoms in adolescence.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1037/abn0000866
Roselinde H Kaiser, Amelia D Moser, Chiara Neilson, Jenna Jones, Elena C Peterson, Luke Ruzic, Benjamin M Rosenberg, Christina M Hough, Christina Sandman, Christopher D Schneck, David J Miklowitz
{"title":"Neurocognitive risk phenotyping to predict mood symptoms in adolescence.","authors":"Roselinde H Kaiser, Amelia D Moser, Chiara Neilson, Jenna Jones, Elena C Peterson, Luke Ruzic, Benjamin M Rosenberg, Christina M Hough, Christina Sandman, Christopher D Schneck, David J Miklowitz","doi":"10.1037/abn0000866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting mood disorders in adolescence is a challenge that motivates research to identify neurocognitive predictors of symptom expression and clinical profiles. This study used machine learning to test whether neurocognitive variables predicted future manic or anhedonic symptoms in two adolescent samples risk-enriched for lifetime mood disorders (Sample 1, <i>n</i> = 73, ages = 13-25, <i>M</i> [<i>SD</i>] = 19.22 [2.49] years, 68% lifetime mood disorder) or familial mood disorders (Sample 2, <i>n</i> = 154, ages = 13-21, <i>M</i> [<i>SD</i>] = 16.46 [1.95] years, 62% first-degree family history of mood disorder). Participants completed cognitive testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, for behavioral and neural measures of reward processing and executive functioning. Next, participants completed a daily diary procedure for 8-16 weeks. Penalized mixed-effects models identified neurocognitive predictors of future mood symptoms and stress-reactive changes in mood symptoms. Results included the following. In both samples, adolescents showing ventral corticostriatal reward hyposensitivity and lower reward performance reported more severe stress-reactive anhedonia. Poorer executive functioning behavior was associated with heightened anhedonia overall in Sample 1, but lower stress-reactive anhedonia in both samples. In Sample 1, adolescents showing ventral corticostriatal reward hypersensitivity and poorer executive functioning reported more severe stress-reactive manic symptoms. Clustering analyses identified, and replicated, five neurocognitive subgroups. Adolescents characterized by neural or behavioral reward hyposensitivities together with average-to-poor executive functioning reported unipolar symptom profiles. Adolescents showing neural reward hypersensitivity together with poor behavioral executive functioning reported a bipolar symptom profile (Sample 1 only). Together, neurocognitive phenotypes may hold value for predicting symptom expression and profiles of mood pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting mood disorders in adolescence is a challenge that motivates research to identify neurocognitive predictors of symptom expression and clinical profiles. This study used machine learning to test whether neurocognitive variables predicted future manic or anhedonic symptoms in two adolescent samples risk-enriched for lifetime mood disorders (Sample 1, n = 73, ages = 13-25, M [SD] = 19.22 [2.49] years, 68% lifetime mood disorder) or familial mood disorders (Sample 2, n = 154, ages = 13-21, M [SD] = 16.46 [1.95] years, 62% first-degree family history of mood disorder). Participants completed cognitive testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, for behavioral and neural measures of reward processing and executive functioning. Next, participants completed a daily diary procedure for 8-16 weeks. Penalized mixed-effects models identified neurocognitive predictors of future mood symptoms and stress-reactive changes in mood symptoms. Results included the following. In both samples, adolescents showing ventral corticostriatal reward hyposensitivity and lower reward performance reported more severe stress-reactive anhedonia. Poorer executive functioning behavior was associated with heightened anhedonia overall in Sample 1, but lower stress-reactive anhedonia in both samples. In Sample 1, adolescents showing ventral corticostriatal reward hypersensitivity and poorer executive functioning reported more severe stress-reactive manic symptoms. Clustering analyses identified, and replicated, five neurocognitive subgroups. Adolescents characterized by neural or behavioral reward hyposensitivities together with average-to-poor executive functioning reported unipolar symptom profiles. Adolescents showing neural reward hypersensitivity together with poor behavioral executive functioning reported a bipolar symptom profile (Sample 1 only). Together, neurocognitive phenotypes may hold value for predicting symptom expression and profiles of mood pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

神经认知风险表型预测青少年情绪症状。
预测青少年情绪障碍是一项挑战,促使研究确定症状表达和临床概况的神经认知预测因子。本研究使用机器学习来测试神经认知变量是否能预测两名终生情绪障碍(样本1,n = 73,年龄= 13-25,M [SD] = 19.22[2.49]年,68%终生情绪障碍)或家族性情绪障碍(样本2,n = 154,年龄= 13-21,M [SD] = 16.46[1.95]年,62%一级情绪障碍家族史)高风险青少年样本的未来躁狂或快感缺乏症状。参与者在基线时完成了认知测试和功能性磁共振成像,用于奖励处理和执行功能的行为和神经测量。接下来,参与者完成了8-16周的每日日记程序。惩罚混合效应模型确定了未来情绪症状的神经认知预测因子和情绪症状的应激反应变化。结果包括以下内容。在这两个样本中,表现出腹侧皮质纹状体奖励低敏感性和较低奖励表现的青少年报告了更严重的应激反应性快感缺乏。在样本1中,较差的执行功能行为与总体快感缺乏症有关,但在两个样本中,压力反应性快感缺乏症较低。在样本1中,表现出腹侧皮质纹状体奖励超敏反应和较差执行功能的青少年报告了更严重的应激反应性躁狂症状。聚类分析确定并复制了五个神经认知亚群。以神经或行为奖励低敏感性为特征的青少年以及平均到较差的执行功能报告了单极症状特征。表现出神经奖励超敏反应和行为执行功能差的青少年报告了双相症状(仅限样本1)。总之,神经认知表型可能对预测症状表达和情绪病理概况具有价值。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信