Reproductive autonomy associated with the use of contraceptive methods among reproductive aged women.

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2023-12-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230072.en
Ana Luiza Vilela Borges, Ana Cleide da Silva Dias, Carolina Cavalcante da Silva Ale
{"title":"Reproductive autonomy associated with the use of contraceptive methods among reproductive aged women.","authors":"Ana Luiza Vilela Borges, Ana Cleide da Silva Dias, Carolina Cavalcante da Silva Ale","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230072.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the sociodemographic aspects associated with reproductive autonomy among urban women, with special regard to the relationship with the use of contraceptive methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study with 1252 women, conducted between April and June 2021, using the Brazilian version of the Reproductive Autonomy Scale. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores for the subscales were 2.5 (SD=0.3) (Decision-making), 3.8 (SD=0.3) (Absence of Coercion) and 3.6 (SD=0.4) (Communication). Compared to women who reported no use of contraceptive methods, women using barrier or behavioral methods and those using LARC had higher level of reproductive autonomy on all dimensions of the Scale (p<0.001). Other aspects associated with reproductive autonomy were education, race/ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status and cohabitation living with a partner, depending on each subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The type of contraceptive method used was statistically associated with reproductive autonomy in all subscales.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230072.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the sociodemographic aspects associated with reproductive autonomy among urban women, with special regard to the relationship with the use of contraceptive methods.

Method: Cross-sectional study with 1252 women, conducted between April and June 2021, using the Brazilian version of the Reproductive Autonomy Scale. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression.

Results: Mean scores for the subscales were 2.5 (SD=0.3) (Decision-making), 3.8 (SD=0.3) (Absence of Coercion) and 3.6 (SD=0.4) (Communication). Compared to women who reported no use of contraceptive methods, women using barrier or behavioral methods and those using LARC had higher level of reproductive autonomy on all dimensions of the Scale (p<0.001). Other aspects associated with reproductive autonomy were education, race/ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status and cohabitation living with a partner, depending on each subscale.

Conclusion: The type of contraceptive method used was statistically associated with reproductive autonomy in all subscales.

育龄妇女与避孕方法使用相关的生殖自主。
目的:评估与城市妇女生殖自主有关的社会人口方面,特别是与使用避孕方法的关系。方法:采用巴西版生殖自主量表,于2021年4月至6月对1252名女性进行横断面研究。数据采用多元线性回归分析。结果:各分量表的平均得分分别为:决策(决策)2.5分(SD=0.3),强迫缺失(决策)3.8分(SD=0.3),沟通(决策)3.6分(SD=0.4)。与未使用避孕方法的妇女相比,使用屏障或行为方法的妇女和使用LARC的妇女在量表的所有维度上都具有更高的生殖自主性(p结论:所使用的避孕方法类型与生殖自主性在所有亚量表上都有统计学上的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信