“No se Cuidan (They Don’t Take Care of Themselves)”: Reframing Reproductive Rights as Contraceptive Responsibility in Post-ICPD Mexico

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Lydia Zacher Dixon
{"title":"“No se Cuidan (They Don’t Take Care of Themselves)”: Reframing Reproductive Rights as Contraceptive Responsibility in Post-ICPD Mexico","authors":"Lydia Zacher Dixon","doi":"10.1007/s12116-023-09409-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mexico has a complicated history when it comes to contraception. Malthusian concerns about population growth have shaped national imperatives to reduce fertility by pushing contraception —especially on Mexico’s rural, poor, and indigenous. Providers have often had to comply or risk their employment. Despite signing onto the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development’s (ICPD) plan to promote reproductive choice for all, forms of contraceptive coercion still occur in Mexico. I draw on ethnographic research in a public hospital delivery ward to examine contemporary practices of contraceptive counseling. While ostensibly no longer utilizing outright force, providers continue to employ persistent pressure, urging women to choose long-term or permanent contraception by the time they leave the delivery ward. I argue that providers may view this persistence as a form of caring, as they cast women as irresponsible for what they see as their inability or refusal to “<i>cuidarse</i> (care for themselves).” Such refusals are framed as symptoms of national concerns, from poverty to education levels to machismo; women’s genuine desires to have more children are rarely seriously considered. I ask: how do such moral regimes of responsibilization shape women’s interactions with providers, as well as their choices, experiences, and health outcomes?</p>","PeriodicalId":47488,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Comparative International Development","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Comparative International Development","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-023-09409-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mexico has a complicated history when it comes to contraception. Malthusian concerns about population growth have shaped national imperatives to reduce fertility by pushing contraception —especially on Mexico’s rural, poor, and indigenous. Providers have often had to comply or risk their employment. Despite signing onto the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development’s (ICPD) plan to promote reproductive choice for all, forms of contraceptive coercion still occur in Mexico. I draw on ethnographic research in a public hospital delivery ward to examine contemporary practices of contraceptive counseling. While ostensibly no longer utilizing outright force, providers continue to employ persistent pressure, urging women to choose long-term or permanent contraception by the time they leave the delivery ward. I argue that providers may view this persistence as a form of caring, as they cast women as irresponsible for what they see as their inability or refusal to “cuidarse (care for themselves).” Such refusals are framed as symptoms of national concerns, from poverty to education levels to machismo; women’s genuine desires to have more children are rarely seriously considered. I ask: how do such moral regimes of responsibilization shape women’s interactions with providers, as well as their choices, experiences, and health outcomes?

Abstract Image

“他们不照顾自己”:墨西哥人发会议后将生殖权利重新定义为避孕责任
在避孕方面,墨西哥有着复杂的历史。马尔萨斯对人口增长的担忧已经形成了通过推行避孕措施来降低生育率的国家当务之急——尤其是在墨西哥的农村、贫困和土著人口中。供应商往往不得不遵守规定,否则就有被解雇的风险。尽管签署了1994年国际人口与发展会议(人发会议)促进所有人生育选择的计划,墨西哥仍然发生各种形式的强制避孕。我借鉴民族志研究在公立医院分娩病房检查避孕咨询的当代做法。虽然表面上不再直接使用武力,但提供者继续施加持续的压力,敦促妇女在离开分娩病房时选择长期或永久避孕措施。我认为,医疗服务提供者可能会把这种坚持看作是一种关心,因为他们认为女性没有能力或拒绝“照顾自己”,因此认为她们是不负责任的。这种拒绝被认为是国家关注的症状,从贫困到教育水平再到大男子主义;女性想要更多孩子的真实愿望很少被认真考虑。我的问题是:这种责任的道德制度如何影响妇女与提供者的互动,以及她们的选择、经历和健康结果?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) is an interdisciplinary journal that addresses issues concerning political, social, economic, and environmental change in local, national, and international contexts. Among its major emphasis are political and state institutions; the effects of a changing international economy; political-economic models of growth and distribution; and the transformation of social structure and culture.The journal has a tradition of presenting critical and innovative analytical perspectives that challenge prevailing orthodoxies. It publishes original research articles on the developing world and is open to all theoretical and methodical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信