Framing innovation success, failure, and transformation: A systematic literature review

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Orlagh Reynolds, Aideen O'Dochartaigh, Enrico Secchi, Donna Marshall, Andrea Prothero
{"title":"Framing innovation success, failure, and transformation: A systematic literature review","authors":"Orlagh Reynolds, Aideen O'Dochartaigh, Enrico Secchi, Donna Marshall, Andrea Prothero","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Framing is a powerful tool shaping innovation success, failure, and transformation. However, innovation framing is not recognized as a unified domain of research and the extant literature is theoretically fragmented across diverse fields. Inconsistencies in definition and operationalization of constructs stall theoretical advancement of innovation framing theory and practice. Importantly, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms enabling framing to mediate innovation outcomes has been missing. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), we integrate diverse theoretical perspectives. Stemming from this, we develop a unified conceptual framework of innovation framing. In so doing we make three vital contributions to the field. First, we develop a typology of construct categories of innovation framing, defining these framing concepts and identifying their theoretical basis. Next, we emphasize the importance of key mechanisms (sensemaking, interpretive flexibility, consensus) in explaining innovation outcomes. Our third contribution identifies innovation stage-specific differences in the role of framing processes, frame types and characteristics, and the temporal elements of these. Finally, we discuss the implications of our research for innovation practitioners, while concluding with a detailed agenda for future innovation framing research.","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12706","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Framing is a powerful tool shaping innovation success, failure, and transformation. However, innovation framing is not recognized as a unified domain of research and the extant literature is theoretically fragmented across diverse fields. Inconsistencies in definition and operationalization of constructs stall theoretical advancement of innovation framing theory and practice. Importantly, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms enabling framing to mediate innovation outcomes has been missing. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), we integrate diverse theoretical perspectives. Stemming from this, we develop a unified conceptual framework of innovation framing. In so doing we make three vital contributions to the field. First, we develop a typology of construct categories of innovation framing, defining these framing concepts and identifying their theoretical basis. Next, we emphasize the importance of key mechanisms (sensemaking, interpretive flexibility, consensus) in explaining innovation outcomes. Our third contribution identifies innovation stage-specific differences in the role of framing processes, frame types and characteristics, and the temporal elements of these. Finally, we discuss the implications of our research for innovation practitioners, while concluding with a detailed agenda for future innovation framing research.
框架创新成功、失败与转型:系统文献综述
框架是塑造创新成功、失败和转型的强大工具。然而,创新框架并没有被认为是一个统一的研究领域,现有的文献在理论上是分散在不同领域的。建构的定义和可操作性的不一致性阻碍了创新框架理论和实践的理论进步。重要的是,对使框架能够调解创新结果的潜在机制的理解一直缺失。运用系统文献回顾法,我们整合了不同的理论观点。基于此,我们提出了一个统一的创新框架概念框架。在这样做的过程中,我们对这一领域作出了三个重要贡献。首先,我们建立了一个构建创新框架类别的类型学,定义了这些框架概念并确定了它们的理论基础。接下来,我们强调了关键机制(语义构建、解释灵活性、共识)在解释创新结果中的重要性。我们的第三个贡献确定了框架过程、框架类型和特征的作用在创新阶段的具体差异,以及它们的时间因素。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究对创新实践者的启示,同时对未来创新框架研究的详细议程进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信