{"title":"Quantification of model risk in stress testing and scenario analysis","authors":"Jimmy Skoglund","doi":"10.21314/jrmv.2019.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding and quantifying the model risk inherent in loss projection models used in the macroeconomic stress testing and impairment estimation is of significant concern for both banks and regulators. The application of relative entropy techniques allow model misspecification robustness to be numerically quantified using exponential tilting towards an alternative probability law. Using a particular loss forecasting model we quantify the model worst-case loss term-structures to yield insight into the behavior of the worst-case. The worst-case obtained represents in general an upward scaling of the term-structure consistent with the exponential tilting adjustment. The relative entropy approach to model risk we use has its foundation in economics with robust forecasting analysis and has recently started to be applied in risk management. The technique can complement the traditional model risk quantification techniques where a specific direction or range of model misspecification reasons are usually considered, such as, model sensitivity analysis, model parameter uncertainty analysis, competing models, and, conservative model assumptions.","PeriodicalId":43447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/jrmv.2019.201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding and quantifying the model risk inherent in loss projection models used in the macroeconomic stress testing and impairment estimation is of significant concern for both banks and regulators. The application of relative entropy techniques allow model misspecification robustness to be numerically quantified using exponential tilting towards an alternative probability law. Using a particular loss forecasting model we quantify the model worst-case loss term-structures to yield insight into the behavior of the worst-case. The worst-case obtained represents in general an upward scaling of the term-structure consistent with the exponential tilting adjustment. The relative entropy approach to model risk we use has its foundation in economics with robust forecasting analysis and has recently started to be applied in risk management. The technique can complement the traditional model risk quantification techniques where a specific direction or range of model misspecification reasons are usually considered, such as, model sensitivity analysis, model parameter uncertainty analysis, competing models, and, conservative model assumptions.
期刊介绍:
As monetary institutions rely greatly on economic and financial models for a wide array of applications, model validation has become progressively inventive within the field of risk. The Journal of Risk Model Validation focuses on the implementation and validation of risk models, and aims to provide a greater understanding of key issues including the empirical evaluation of existing models, pitfalls in model validation and the development of new methods. We also publish papers on back-testing. Our main field of application is in credit risk modelling but we are happy to consider any issues of risk model validation for any financial asset class. The Journal of Risk Model Validation considers submissions in the form of research papers on topics including, but not limited to: Empirical model evaluation studies Backtesting studies Stress-testing studies New methods of model validation/backtesting/stress-testing Best practices in model development, deployment, production and maintenance Pitfalls in model validation techniques (all types of risk, forecasting, pricing and rating)