Self-Reported Stuttering Severity Is Accurate: Informing Methods for Large-Scale Data Collection in Stuttering.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sarah Horton, Victoria Jackson, Jessica Boyce, Marie-Christine Franken, Stephanie Siemers, Miya St John, Stephen Hearps, Olivia van Reyk, Ruth Braden, Richard Parker, Adam P Vogel, Else Eising, David J Amor, Janelle Irvine, Simon E Fisher, Nicholas G Martin, Sheena Reilly, Melanie Bahlo, Ingrid Scheffer, Angela Morgan
{"title":"Self-Reported Stuttering Severity Is Accurate: Informing Methods for Large-Scale Data Collection in Stuttering.","authors":"Sarah Horton, Victoria Jackson, Jessica Boyce, Marie-Christine Franken, Stephanie Siemers, Miya St John, Stephen Hearps, Olivia van Reyk, Ruth Braden, Richard Parker, Adam P Vogel, Else Eising, David J Amor, Janelle Irvine, Simon E Fisher, Nicholas G Martin, Sheena Reilly, Melanie Bahlo, Ingrid Scheffer, Angela Morgan","doi":"10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To our knowledge, there are no data examining the agreement between self-reported and clinician-rated stuttering severity. In the era of big data, self-reported ratings have great potential utility for large-scale data collection, where cost and time preclude in-depth assessment by a clinician. Equally, there is increasing emphasis on the need to recognize an individual's experience of their own condition. Here, we examined the agreement between self-reported stuttering severity compared to clinician ratings during a speech assessment. As a secondary objective, we determined whether self-reported stuttering severity correlated with an individual's subjective impact of stuttering.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Speech-language pathologists conducted face-to-face speech assessments with 195 participants (137 males) aged 5-84 years, recruited from a cohort of people with self-reported stuttering. Stuttering severity was rated on a 10-point scale by the participant and by two speech-language pathologists. Participants also completed the Overall Assessment of the Subjective Experience of Stuttering (OASES). Clinician and participant ratings were compared. The association between stuttering severity and the OASES scores was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a strong positive correlation between speech-language pathologist and participant-reported ratings of stuttering severity. Participant-reported stuttering severity correlated weakly with the four OASES domains and with the OASES overall impact score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants were able to accurately rate their stuttering severity during a speech assessment using a simple one-item question. This finding indicates that self-report stuttering severity is a suitable method for large-scale data collection. Findings also support the collection of self-report subjective experience data using questionnaires, such as the OASES, which add vital information about the participants' experience of stuttering that is not captured by overt speech severity ratings alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"4015-4024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To our knowledge, there are no data examining the agreement between self-reported and clinician-rated stuttering severity. In the era of big data, self-reported ratings have great potential utility for large-scale data collection, where cost and time preclude in-depth assessment by a clinician. Equally, there is increasing emphasis on the need to recognize an individual's experience of their own condition. Here, we examined the agreement between self-reported stuttering severity compared to clinician ratings during a speech assessment. As a secondary objective, we determined whether self-reported stuttering severity correlated with an individual's subjective impact of stuttering.

Method: Speech-language pathologists conducted face-to-face speech assessments with 195 participants (137 males) aged 5-84 years, recruited from a cohort of people with self-reported stuttering. Stuttering severity was rated on a 10-point scale by the participant and by two speech-language pathologists. Participants also completed the Overall Assessment of the Subjective Experience of Stuttering (OASES). Clinician and participant ratings were compared. The association between stuttering severity and the OASES scores was examined.

Results: There was a strong positive correlation between speech-language pathologist and participant-reported ratings of stuttering severity. Participant-reported stuttering severity correlated weakly with the four OASES domains and with the OASES overall impact score.

Conclusions: Participants were able to accurately rate their stuttering severity during a speech assessment using a simple one-item question. This finding indicates that self-report stuttering severity is a suitable method for large-scale data collection. Findings also support the collection of self-report subjective experience data using questionnaires, such as the OASES, which add vital information about the participants' experience of stuttering that is not captured by overt speech severity ratings alone.

自述口吃严重程度是准确的:为大规模口吃数据收集方法提供参考。
目的:据我们所知,目前还没有数据研究自我报告和临床医生评定的口吃严重程度之间的一致性。在大数据时代,由于成本和时间原因,临床医生无法进行深入评估,因此自我报告的评分在大规模数据收集方面具有巨大的潜在作用。同样,人们也越来越强调需要认识到个人对自身情况的体验。在此,我们研究了在语言评估过程中,自我报告的口吃严重程度与临床医生评分之间的一致性。作为次要目标,我们还确定了自我报告的口吃严重程度是否与个人对口吃的主观影响相关:言语病理学家对 195 名年龄在 5-84 岁之间的参与者(137 名男性)进行了面对面的言语评估,这些参与者是从自我报告口吃的人群中招募的。口吃严重程度由参与者和两名语言病理学家按 10 分制评分。参与者还完成了口吃主观体验总体评估(OASES)。对临床医生和参与者的评分进行了比较。对口吃严重程度与 OASES 分数之间的关联进行了研究:结果:言语病理学家和参与者报告的口吃严重程度评分之间存在很强的正相关性。参与者报告的口吃严重程度与 OASES 的四个领域和 OASES 的总体影响得分之间的相关性较弱:结论:在言语评估过程中,受试者能够通过一个简单的单项问题准确评定自己的口吃严重程度。这一结果表明,自我报告口吃严重程度是一种适合大规模数据收集的方法。研究结果还支持使用 OASES 等问卷收集自我报告的主观体验数据,这些数据为参与者的口吃体验增添了重要信息,而仅通过公开的言语严重程度评级是无法捕捉到这些信息的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信