Anya Umlauf, Florin Vaida, Saurabh Gupta, Mariana Cherner, Richard C Gershon, Robert K Heaton
{"title":"Automated procedure for demographic adjustments on cognitive test scores.","authors":"Anya Umlauf, Florin Vaida, Saurabh Gupta, Mariana Cherner, Richard C Gershon, Robert K Heaton","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2288231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performances of normal people on cognitive tests are known to vary by demographic characteristics, such as age, education, and sex. Thus, cognitive test scores should be corrected for demographic influences when they are used to detect below-expected results due to disease or injury involving the central nervous system (CNS). Normative corrections, if estimated from a large, diverse, and well-characterized cohort of controls, help to remove expected differences in cognitive performance associated with normal demographic characteristics and associated socio-economic disadvantages. In this paper, we (1) describe in detail the process of generating regression-based normative standards, and its advantages and limitations, (2) provide recommendations for applying these normative standards to data from individuals and populations at risk for CNS dysfunction, and (3) introduce an R package, <i>test2norm</i>, that contains functions for producing and applying normative formulas to generate demographically corrected scores for measuring deviations from expected, normal cognitive performances.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1476-1485"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11150334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2288231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Performances of normal people on cognitive tests are known to vary by demographic characteristics, such as age, education, and sex. Thus, cognitive test scores should be corrected for demographic influences when they are used to detect below-expected results due to disease or injury involving the central nervous system (CNS). Normative corrections, if estimated from a large, diverse, and well-characterized cohort of controls, help to remove expected differences in cognitive performance associated with normal demographic characteristics and associated socio-economic disadvantages. In this paper, we (1) describe in detail the process of generating regression-based normative standards, and its advantages and limitations, (2) provide recommendations for applying these normative standards to data from individuals and populations at risk for CNS dysfunction, and (3) introduce an R package, test2norm, that contains functions for producing and applying normative formulas to generate demographically corrected scores for measuring deviations from expected, normal cognitive performances.
众所周知,正常人在认知测试中的表现会因人口统计学特征(如年龄、教育程度和性别)的不同而有所差异。因此,认知测验分数在用于检测中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病或损伤导致的低于预期的结果时,应根据人口统计学的影响进行校正。常模校正如果是通过大量、多样且特征明确的对照组进行估算,则有助于消除与正常人口特征和相关社会经济劣势有关的认知表现预期差异。在本文中,我们(1)详细描述了生成基于回归的常模标准的过程及其优势和局限性;(2)提供了将这些常模标准应用于中枢神经系统功能障碍高危个体和人群数据的建议;(3)介绍了一个 R 软件包 test2norm,该软件包包含用于生成和应用常模公式的函数,以生成人口统计学校正分数,用于测量与预期正常认知表现的偏差。
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.