Is there any difference in mortality rates of atrial fibrillation detected before or after ischemic stroke?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ileri Cigdem, Dogan Zekeriya, Ozben Beste, Midi Ipek, Pazarci Nevin
{"title":"Is there any difference in mortality rates of atrial fibrillation detected before or after ischemic stroke?","authors":"Ileri Cigdem, Dogan Zekeriya, Ozben Beste, Midi Ipek, Pazarci Nevin","doi":"10.18071/isz.76.0365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) is a new term used for AF resulting from autonomic dysregulation. It is associated with a lower stroke recurrence compared to patients with known AF before a stroke (KAF). The aim of the study was to explore the characteristics and mortality rates in AFDAS patients.</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>134 ischemic stroke patients (66.1&plusmn;14.2 years old, n=73 male) were consecutively included in the study. While patients who had known AF with anticoagulant therapy were grouped as KAF, patients with newly documented AF rhythm (either by daily ECG or ambulatory ECG monitoring) were classified as AFDAS. All patients were followed for 1 year to obtain all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and neurogenic mortality.</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Of the 134 stroke patients, AF&nbsp;was detected newly in 38 patients and grouped as AFDAS. KAF patients had higher CHA2DS2VASc scores, hs-CRP and NT-proBNP levels, and more insular cortex involvement than the SR group. During the one-year follow-up, 35 stroke patients died. The mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with KAF (12/22; 54.5%) while the mortality rates were similar between AFDAS patients (11/38; 28.9%) and patients with sinus rhythm (SR) (12/74; 16.2%). KAF was an independent predictor when adjusted by age, sex, CHA2DS2VASc and NIHSS scores, and insular cortex involvement. While AFDAS had increased the mortality risk compared to SR, the difference was not significant in univariable and multivariable models.</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>AFDAS patients have similar CHA2DS2VASc scores and mortality rates to patients with SR, which implies that AFDAS might be a relatively benign form of AF.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"76 11-12","pages":"365-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:

Atrial fibrillation diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS) is a new term used for AF resulting from autonomic dysregulation. It is associated with a lower stroke recurrence compared to patients with known AF before a stroke (KAF). The aim of the study was to explore the characteristics and mortality rates in AFDAS patients.

.

Methods:

134 ischemic stroke patients (66.1±14.2 years old, n=73 male) were consecutively included in the study. While patients who had known AF with anticoagulant therapy were grouped as KAF, patients with newly documented AF rhythm (either by daily ECG or ambulatory ECG monitoring) were classified as AFDAS. All patients were followed for 1 year to obtain all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and neurogenic mortality.

.

Results:

Of the 134 stroke patients, AF was detected newly in 38 patients and grouped as AFDAS. KAF patients had higher CHA2DS2VASc scores, hs-CRP and NT-proBNP levels, and more insular cortex involvement than the SR group. During the one-year follow-up, 35 stroke patients died. The mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with KAF (12/22; 54.5%) while the mortality rates were similar between AFDAS patients (11/38; 28.9%) and patients with sinus rhythm (SR) (12/74; 16.2%). KAF was an independent predictor when adjusted by age, sex, CHA2DS2VASc and NIHSS scores, and insular cortex involvement. While AFDAS had increased the mortality risk compared to SR, the difference was not significant in univariable and multivariable models.

.

Conclusion:

AFDAS patients have similar CHA2DS2VASc scores and mortality rates to patients with SR, which implies that AFDAS might be a relatively benign form of AF.

.

缺血性中风之前或之后发现的心房颤动死亡率是否有差异?
背景和目的:卒中后诊断的房颤(AFDAS)是一个新术语,用于指因自主神经调节失调而导致的房颤。与中风前已知心房颤动的患者(KAF)相比,它与较低的中风复发率相关。研究旨在探讨房颤患者的特征和死亡率。方法:连续纳入 134 名缺血性中风患者(66.1 岁以上,14.2 岁,男性 73 人)。已知心房颤动并接受抗凝治疗的患者被归为 KAF,而新记录到心房颤动节律的患者(通过日常心电图或非卧床心电图监测)被归为 AFDAS。对所有患者进行为期一年的随访,以了解全因死亡率、心脏病死亡率和神经源性死亡率:在134名中风患者中,有38名患者新发现房颤,并被归为AFDAS。与 SR 组相比,KAF 患者的 CHA2DS2VASc 评分、hs-CRP 和 NT-proBNP 水平更高,岛叶皮质受累更多。在为期一年的随访中,35 名中风患者死亡。KAF患者的死亡率明显更高(12/22;54.5%),而AFDAS患者(11/38;28.9%)和窦性心律(SR)患者(12/74;16.2%)的死亡率相似。经年龄、性别、CHA2DS2VASc 和 NIHSS 评分以及岛叶皮质受累调整后,KAF 是一个独立的预测因子。虽然与SR相比,AFDAS增加了死亡率风险,但在单变量和多变量模型中差异并不显著:AFDAS患者的CHA2DS2VASc评分和死亡率与SR患者相似,这意味着AFDAS可能是一种相对良性的房颤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信