The impact of community-based food access strategies in high-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sandra Marjanovic, Katherine Kent, Nicky Morrison, Jason Wu, Catharine Fleming, Kathy Trieu, Kate McBride, David Simmons, Uchechukwu Osuagwu, Freya MacMillan
{"title":"The impact of community-based food access strategies in high-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Sandra Marjanovic, Katherine Kent, Nicky Morrison, Jason Wu, Catharine Fleming, Kathy Trieu, Kate McBride, David Simmons, Uchechukwu Osuagwu, Freya MacMillan","doi":"10.17061/phrp3342333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Some geographic regions in high-income countries (HIC), including Australia, have poor healthy food access and a high burden of diet-related chronic disease. Scalable and sustainable strategies to strengthen community food systems have the potential to address these inequities. To inform future interventions in regions with poor healthy food access in Sydney, Australia, and beyond, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of community-based food access interventions in HIC, to identify effects on dietary behaviours and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four electronic databases were searched. Studies involving community-based healthy food access strategies (solely or combined with education/behaviour change) and measuring effects on dietary behaviours and/or health outcomes were identified. Data on dietary behaviours, health outcomes and intervention descriptions were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies met inclusion criteria, with most conducted in the US (n = 6). Intervention strategies included food pantry-based interventions (n = 2), mobile produce markets (n = 2) and community farms (n = 3). Most interventions (n = 6, 85%) incorporated educational and/or behavioural change aspects. All studies measured fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake, with nearly all (n =6, 85%) reporting significant beneficial effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence in our synthesis demonstrates that multicomponent community-based food system interventions promise to improve F&V intake in regions of HICs. Recommendations for improving future evaluations are identified to build evidence for policymakers and urban planners to enact upstream and downstream strategies to strengthen community healthy food, particularly in geographic regions with the greatest health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3342333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Some geographic regions in high-income countries (HIC), including Australia, have poor healthy food access and a high burden of diet-related chronic disease. Scalable and sustainable strategies to strengthen community food systems have the potential to address these inequities. To inform future interventions in regions with poor healthy food access in Sydney, Australia, and beyond, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials of community-based food access interventions in HIC, to identify effects on dietary behaviours and health outcomes.

Methods: Four electronic databases were searched. Studies involving community-based healthy food access strategies (solely or combined with education/behaviour change) and measuring effects on dietary behaviours and/or health outcomes were identified. Data on dietary behaviours, health outcomes and intervention descriptions were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed.

Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria, with most conducted in the US (n = 6). Intervention strategies included food pantry-based interventions (n = 2), mobile produce markets (n = 2) and community farms (n = 3). Most interventions (n = 6, 85%) incorporated educational and/or behavioural change aspects. All studies measured fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake, with nearly all (n =6, 85%) reporting significant beneficial effects.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence in our synthesis demonstrates that multicomponent community-based food system interventions promise to improve F&V intake in regions of HICs. Recommendations for improving future evaluations are identified to build evidence for policymakers and urban planners to enact upstream and downstream strategies to strengthen community healthy food, particularly in geographic regions with the greatest health inequities.

高收入国家以社区为基础的食物获取战略的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾。
目标:包括澳大利亚在内的一些高收入国家(HIC)地区,健康食品的可及性较差,与饮食相关的慢性疾病负担较重。加强社区食品系统的可扩展、可持续战略有可能解决这些不平等问题。为了给澳大利亚悉尼及其他健康食品匮乏地区未来的干预措施提供信息,我们系统地回顾了高收入国家社区食品获取干预措施的随机对照试验,以确定对饮食行为和健康结果的影响:方法:我们检索了四个电子数据库。方法:对四个电子数据库进行了检索,确定了涉及社区健康食品获取策略(单独或与教育/行为改变相结合)的研究,以及衡量对饮食行为和/或健康结果影响的研究。提取了有关饮食行为、健康结果和干预措施描述的数据,并对偏倚风险进行了评估:有 7 项研究符合纳入标准,其中大部分在美国进行(n = 6)。干预策略包括食品储藏室干预(2 项)、流动农产品市场(2 项)和社区农场(3 项)。大多数干预措施(n = 6,85%)都包含教育和/或行为改变方面的内容。所有研究都测量了水果和蔬菜(F&V)的摄入量,几乎所有研究(6 项,85%)都报告了显著的有益效果:我们综合的初步证据表明,以社区为基础的多成分食品系统干预措施有望提高高收入国家地区的水果和蔬菜摄入量。我们提出了改进未来评估的建议,以便为政策制定者和城市规划者提供证据,制定上游和下游战略,加强社区健康食品,尤其是在健康不平等现象最严重的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信