Systems analysis of the effects of the 2014-16 Ebola crisis on WHO-reporting nations' policy adaptations and 2020-21 COVID-19 response: a systematized review.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jessi Hanson-DeFusco, Min Shi, Zoe Du, Ornheilia Zounon, Fidèle Marc Hounnouvi, Albert DeFusco
{"title":"Systems analysis of the effects of the 2014-16 Ebola crisis on WHO-reporting nations' policy adaptations and 2020-21 COVID-19 response: a systematized review.","authors":"Jessi Hanson-DeFusco, Min Shi, Zoe Du, Ornheilia Zounon, Fidèle Marc Hounnouvi, Albert DeFusco","doi":"10.1186/s12992-023-00997-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent case studies indicate that the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak, one of the worst pre-2020 global biological catastrophes in modern history, helped some nations to better prepared their responses for the COVID-19 pandemic. While such national case studies explore how specific nations applied EVD-related policies in their domestic battle against the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no known study that assesses how many WHO nations learned from the West African crisis and to what scale.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Applying the policy legacies analytical framework and a systematized literature review, this research examines how prior policy experiences with the 2014-16 EVD crisis as a large-scale emergent outbreak helped to inform and to condition WHO nations to proactively prepare their national policies and health systems for future threats, including ultimately COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematized literature review of 803 evaluated sources assesses to what extent Ebola-affected and non-affected nations directly modified governmental health systems in relation to this warning. The study further evaluates how nations with documented Ebola-related changes fared during COVID-19 compared to nations that did not. We present a categorical theoretical framework that allows for classifying different types of national response activities (termed conditioned learning).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten (90.9%) of 11 nations that were affected by 2014-16 Ebola crisis have documented evidence of repurposing their EVD-related policies to fight COVID-19. 164 (70.0%) of 234 non-EVD-affected nations had documented evidence of specifically adapting national systems to incorporate policy recommendations developed from the 2014-16 crisis, which informed their COVID-19 responses in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The shock of 2014-16 EVD outbreak affected most nations around the world, whether they experienced Ebola cases. We further develop a categorical framework that helps characterised nations previous experiences with this biological catastrophe, providing a means to analyse to what extent that individual nations learned and how these EVD-related changes helped inform their COVID-19 response. Nations that demonstrated EVD-related conditioned learning nations tended to have more stringent COVID-19 responses before April 2020 and utilized documented response mechanisms developed out of the West African crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00997-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent case studies indicate that the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak, one of the worst pre-2020 global biological catastrophes in modern history, helped some nations to better prepared their responses for the COVID-19 pandemic. While such national case studies explore how specific nations applied EVD-related policies in their domestic battle against the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no known study that assesses how many WHO nations learned from the West African crisis and to what scale.

Objective: Applying the policy legacies analytical framework and a systematized literature review, this research examines how prior policy experiences with the 2014-16 EVD crisis as a large-scale emergent outbreak helped to inform and to condition WHO nations to proactively prepare their national policies and health systems for future threats, including ultimately COVID-19.

Methods: A systematized literature review of 803 evaluated sources assesses to what extent Ebola-affected and non-affected nations directly modified governmental health systems in relation to this warning. The study further evaluates how nations with documented Ebola-related changes fared during COVID-19 compared to nations that did not. We present a categorical theoretical framework that allows for classifying different types of national response activities (termed conditioned learning).

Results: Ten (90.9%) of 11 nations that were affected by 2014-16 Ebola crisis have documented evidence of repurposing their EVD-related policies to fight COVID-19. 164 (70.0%) of 234 non-EVD-affected nations had documented evidence of specifically adapting national systems to incorporate policy recommendations developed from the 2014-16 crisis, which informed their COVID-19 responses in 2020.

Conclusions: The shock of 2014-16 EVD outbreak affected most nations around the world, whether they experienced Ebola cases. We further develop a categorical framework that helps characterised nations previous experiences with this biological catastrophe, providing a means to analyse to what extent that individual nations learned and how these EVD-related changes helped inform their COVID-19 response. Nations that demonstrated EVD-related conditioned learning nations tended to have more stringent COVID-19 responses before April 2020 and utilized documented response mechanisms developed out of the West African crisis.

2014-16年埃博拉危机对世卫组织报告国政策调整和2020-21年COVID-19应对措施影响的系统分析:系统化审查。
背景:最近的案例研究表明,2014-2016 年爆发的埃博拉疫情是现代史上 2020 年前最严重的全球生物灾难之一,它帮助一些国家更好地做好了应对 COVID-19 大流行的准备。虽然此类国家案例研究探讨了特定国家如何在国内应对 COVID-19 大流行的斗争中应用 EVD 相关政策,但目前还没有已知的研究评估世界卫生组织有多少国家从西非危机中学到了什么以及学到了什么:本研究运用政策遗产分析框架和系统化的文献综述,探讨 2014-16 年 EVD 危机作为大规模突发疫情的先前政策经验如何帮助世卫组织成员国了解并调整其国家政策和卫生系统,为应对未来威胁(最终包括 COVID-19)做好积极准备:方法:通过对 803 个评估来源进行系统的文献回顾,评估受埃博拉影响和未受影响的国家在多大程度上直接修改了与这一警告相关的政府卫生系统。研究还进一步评估了在 COVID-19 期间有埃博拉相关变化记录的国家与没有相关变化记录的国家相比的表现。我们提出了一个分类理论框架,可对不同类型的国家应对活动进行分类(称为条件学习):结果:在受到 2014-16 年埃博拉危机影响的 11 个国家中,有 10 个国家(90.9%)记录了为应对 COVID-19 而调整其 EVD 相关政策的证据。在 234 个未受 EVD 影响的国家中,有 164 个国家(70.0%)记录了具体调整国家系统的证据,以纳入从 2014-16 年危机中制定的政策建议,这些建议为其 2020 年的 COVID-19 应对措施提供了依据:结论:2014-16 年 EVD 疫情爆发的冲击影响了世界上大多数国家,无论它们是否出现埃博拉病例。我们进一步制定了一个分类框架,有助于描述各国以前应对这场生物灾难的经验,为分析各国在多大程度上吸取了经验教训以及这些与 EVD 相关的变化如何帮助其制定 COVID-19 应对措施提供了一种方法。表现出与 EVD 相关的条件学习的国家往往会在 2020 年 4 月之前采取更严格的 COVID-19 应对措施,并利用从西非危机中发展出来的有据可查的应对机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信