Commercial human frozen plasmas for local, cross-site and long-term comparability of coagulation analysers.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001268
Amélie Launois, Sara Zia Chahabi, Floriane Devaux, Isabelle Amouroux, Claire Flaujac
{"title":"Commercial human frozen plasmas for local, cross-site and long-term comparability of coagulation analysers.","authors":"Amélie Launois, Sara Zia Chahabi, Floriane Devaux, Isabelle Amouroux, Claire Flaujac","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laboratory compliance implies to correlate instruments for coagulation parameter with a wide range of measure using patient samples or commercialized sets of frozen plasmas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra, inter-reproducibility and long-term stability of ExpertCor Routine (ECR) plasma sets (Stago) on different parameters. The study was realized in two laboratories on four different instruments. Inter-site and intra-site correlation of ECR sets for PT, aPTT, Fibrinogen, INR, factor V (FV) UFH and LMWH anti-Xa and intra-reproducibility of DDimer (DDI), factor VIII (FVIII:C) and antithrombin (AT) assays were tested. To evaluate ECR long-term stability, samples were tested until 180 after delivery in one laboratory. Intra-site evaluation correlation coefficients is around 1. All predefined criteria to fulfil good comparability between inter-site instruments are met with Passing slopes between 0.9 and 1.1 and intercepts ranging from -0.62 to 2.83%. Long-term stability evaluation does not show any deviation over 180 days for aPTT, fibrinogen, DDI, UFH, LMWH but a drift for FV with STA-NeoPTimal reagent. On contrary, AT and FVIII:C are not stable. PT in second has an excellent stability unlike PT in percentage. Our study validates the use of ECR sets for correlation between instruments and inter-sites agreement, as for parameters claimed on the products than for factor V and FVIII:C. The evaluation of stability confirming the possible extension of use for 180 days after delivery except for FVIII:C and AT. These plasmas sets are an excellent alternative to local plasma patient use to perform instrument comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laboratory compliance implies to correlate instruments for coagulation parameter with a wide range of measure using patient samples or commercialized sets of frozen plasmas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra, inter-reproducibility and long-term stability of ExpertCor Routine (ECR) plasma sets (Stago) on different parameters. The study was realized in two laboratories on four different instruments. Inter-site and intra-site correlation of ECR sets for PT, aPTT, Fibrinogen, INR, factor V (FV) UFH and LMWH anti-Xa and intra-reproducibility of DDimer (DDI), factor VIII (FVIII:C) and antithrombin (AT) assays were tested. To evaluate ECR long-term stability, samples were tested until 180 after delivery in one laboratory. Intra-site evaluation correlation coefficients is around 1. All predefined criteria to fulfil good comparability between inter-site instruments are met with Passing slopes between 0.9 and 1.1 and intercepts ranging from -0.62 to 2.83%. Long-term stability evaluation does not show any deviation over 180 days for aPTT, fibrinogen, DDI, UFH, LMWH but a drift for FV with STA-NeoPTimal reagent. On contrary, AT and FVIII:C are not stable. PT in second has an excellent stability unlike PT in percentage. Our study validates the use of ECR sets for correlation between instruments and inter-sites agreement, as for parameters claimed on the products than for factor V and FVIII:C. The evaluation of stability confirming the possible extension of use for 180 days after delivery except for FVIII:C and AT. These plasmas sets are an excellent alternative to local plasma patient use to perform instrument comparison.

用于凝血分析仪的本地、异地和长期可比性的商用人体冷冻血浆。
实验室合规性意味着使用患者样本或商业化的冷冻血浆集对凝血参数进行广泛测量的相关仪器。本研究旨在评估ExpertCor常规(ECR)血浆套装(Stago)在不同参数上的内部、相互可重复性和长期稳定性。研究在两个实验室的四台不同仪器上进行。测试了 ECR 套装在 PT、aPTT、纤维蛋白原、INR、因子 V (FV)、UFH 和 LMWH 抗 Xa 方面的站间和站内相关性,以及 DDimer (DDI)、因子 VIII (FVIII:C) 和抗凝血酶 (AT) 检测方面的站内再现性。为评估 ECR 的长期稳定性,在一家实验室对样本进行了检测,直至交付后 180 天。所有预定义的标准均符合,可满足不同检测点仪器之间良好的可比性要求,通过斜率在 0.9 和 1.1 之间,截距在 -0.62 至 2.83% 之间。在 180 天的长期稳定性评估中,APTT、纤维蛋白原、DDI、UFH、LMWH 没有出现任何偏差,但使用 STA-NeoPTimal 试剂的 FV 出现了漂移。相反,AT 和 FVIII:C 不稳定。与百分比 PT 不同,第二种 PT 具有极佳的稳定性。与因子 V 和 FVIII:C 相比,我们的研究验证了使用 ECR 集进行仪器之间的相关性和站点之间的一致性。对稳定性的评估证实,除 FVIII:C 和 AT 外,产品交付后可延长使用 180 天。这些血浆套装是病人使用本地血浆进行仪器比较的绝佳替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信