Where there is smoke, there is fire? Making sense of the past failure and future prospects of cannabis reform in Chile

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jonas von Hoffmann
{"title":"Where there is smoke, there is fire? Making sense of the past failure and future prospects of cannabis reform in Chile","authors":"Jonas von Hoffmann","doi":"10.1111/lamp.12318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A decade ago, cannabis reform was on the public and political agenda in Chile, but the reform process eventually broke down with no marijuana legalization. This article focuses on the different stages of agenda politics to explain the reasons for the failure of cannabis reform in Chile. Drawing on original data, including 36 interviews with key actors, the article traces the reform process. Through a combination of process tracing and counterfactual analysis, the article establishes the causal weight of explanatory factors and distinguishes between activities and their effects. The evidence shows that cannabis reform in Chile failed not only because of a lack of governmental support and agenda setting but also because reform proponents were unable and unwilling to maintain the agenda after initially setting it successfully. By contrast, insider and outsider reform opponents were effective at agenda denial and counter‐framing cannabis reform. Despite producing lots of smoke, recreational cannabis reform efforts have burned out without blazing the trail toward marijuana legalization in Chile. By unearthing the factors that led to initial success in gaining attention and to eventual failure in securing approval in the recent past, this article points out the difficulties of legalizing marijuana in Chile in the near future.","PeriodicalId":42501,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Policy","volume":"14 4","pages":"599-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A decade ago, cannabis reform was on the public and political agenda in Chile, but the reform process eventually broke down with no marijuana legalization. This article focuses on the different stages of agenda politics to explain the reasons for the failure of cannabis reform in Chile. Drawing on original data, including 36 interviews with key actors, the article traces the reform process. Through a combination of process tracing and counterfactual analysis, the article establishes the causal weight of explanatory factors and distinguishes between activities and their effects. The evidence shows that cannabis reform in Chile failed not only because of a lack of governmental support and agenda setting but also because reform proponents were unable and unwilling to maintain the agenda after initially setting it successfully. By contrast, insider and outsider reform opponents were effective at agenda denial and counter‐framing cannabis reform. Despite producing lots of smoke, recreational cannabis reform efforts have burned out without blazing the trail toward marijuana legalization in Chile. By unearthing the factors that led to initial success in gaining attention and to eventual failure in securing approval in the recent past, this article points out the difficulties of legalizing marijuana in Chile in the near future.
无风不起浪?理解智利大麻改革过去的失败和未来的前景
十年前,大麻改革被提上了智利的公共和政治议程,但改革进程最终因大麻没有合法化而破裂。这篇文章的重点是议程政治的不同阶段,以解释大麻改革在智利失败的原因。本文利用原始数据,包括对36位关键参与者的采访,追溯了改革过程。通过过程追踪和反事实分析相结合的方法,建立了解释因素的因果权重,并区分了活动及其影响。有证据表明,智利的大麻改革之所以失败,不仅是因为缺乏政府支持和议程设置,还因为改革支持者在最初成功设置议程后,无法也不愿维持议程。相比之下,内部和外部改革反对者在议程否认和反框架大麻改革方面是有效的。尽管产生了大量的烟雾,但娱乐性大麻的改革努力已经付之一炬,没有在智利开辟大麻合法化的道路。本文通过揭示导致大麻最初获得关注而最终未能获得批准的因素,指出了大麻在不久的将来在智利合法化的困难。然而,改革进程最终失败,大麻没有合法化。本文聚焦于议程政治的不同阶段,以解释智利大麻改革失败的原因。通过利用原始数据,包括对关键行动者进行的36次访谈,本文仔细追踪了改革进程。通过结合过程追踪和反事实分析,本文确定了解释性因素的因果权重,并区分了活动及其影响。证据表明,智利的大麻改革失败不仅因为缺乏政府支持和议程设定,还因为改革支持者在最初成功设定议程后无法也不愿意维持议程。相比之下,内外部的改革反对者有效地否认了议程,并反向描述了大麻改革。尽管声势浩大,但娱乐性大麻改革措施遭遇失败,没有为智利的大麻合法化开辟道路。通过找出一系列导致最初获得关注的因素和导致最终未能获得批准的因素,本文指出了智利大麻合法化在不远的将来面临的困难。在智利,是否有一项关于大麻改革的议程pública y política。由于禁运,el改革进程最终将看到desmoronó Sin logar la legalización de la大麻。Este artículo在智利举行的关于大麻改革的特别会议上提出不同意见和意见negociación。Basándose en datos originales,包括36家企业,以及artículo签署了改革进程的指导意见。1 .通过análisis订立合同,通过合同和/或合同和/或合同和/或合同和/或合同,通过不同的中心活动和影响,明确说明不同因素的因果关系。有证据表明,在智利进行大麻改革是必要的falló没有单独的证据表明政府的改革是必要的,没有证据表明政府的改革是必要的,没有证据表明政府的改革是必要的,没有证据表明政府的改革是必要的,没有证据表明政府的改革是必要的,没有证据表明政府的改革是必要的。与此相反,国际上的反对意见与国外的改革意见是一致的,而改革意见是有效的。在智利,有一个特别报告员atención,在智利的aprobación de la legalización de la大麻娱乐中心进行大麻改革。所有相同的损失因素,如智利的大麻合法化问题,如智利的大麻合法化问题,如智利的大麻合法化问题,如智利的大麻合法化问题,如智利的大麻合法化问题,如智利的大麻合法化问题,如智利的大麻合法化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Latin American Policy
Latin American Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Latin American Policy (LAP): A Journal of Politics and Governance in a Changing Region, a collaboration of the Policy Studies Organization and the Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus, published its first issue in mid-2010. LAP’s primary focus is intended to be in the policy arena, and will focus on any issue or field involving authority and polities (although not necessarily clustered on governments), agency (either governmental or from the civil society, or both), and the pursuit/achievement of specific (or anticipated) outcomes. We invite authors to focus on any crosscutting issue situated in the interface between the policy and political domain concerning or affecting any Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) country or group of countries. This journal will remain open to multidisciplinary approaches dealing with policy issues and the political contexts in which they take place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信