Sedentary behavior and physical inactivity from a comprehensive perspective

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia Rey-Brandariz , Jessica Rial-Vázquez , Leonor Varela-Lema , María Isolina Santiago-Pérez , Cristina Candal-Pedreira , Carla Guerra-Tort , Alberto Ruano-Ravina , Mónica Pérez-Ríos
{"title":"Sedentary behavior and physical inactivity from a comprehensive perspective","authors":"Julia Rey-Brandariz ,&nbsp;Jessica Rial-Vázquez ,&nbsp;Leonor Varela-Lema ,&nbsp;María Isolina Santiago-Pérez ,&nbsp;Cristina Candal-Pedreira ,&nbsp;Carla Guerra-Tort ,&nbsp;Alberto Ruano-Ravina ,&nbsp;Mónica Pérez-Ríos","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To characterize the prevalence of physical activity in the population aged ≥16 years integrating sedentarism and physical inactivity.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A cross-sectional study using data from the Galician Risk Behavior Data System (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12,928) was conducted. The population was classified into four categories: physically active (active and non-sedentary), active but sedentary (active and sedentary), lightly active (inactive and non-sedentary), and extremely sedentary (inactive and sedentary). Prevalences were calculated for each category and a multinomial logistic regression model was fitted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>58.0% of the population was physically active and the remaining 42.0% presented some degree of sedentarism and/or physical inactivity. Men were more likely to be extremely sedentary. The risk of sedentarism decreased with age, and workers and/or students were prone to a higher risk of extreme sedentarism in comparison to those who reported other status. Extremely sendentary behaviors were also more common in people with higher educational levels, individuals living alone, residents of urban environments, and smokers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Joint evaluation of sedentarism and physical inactivity provides a more comprehensive and realistic picture of population behaviors related with physical activity. Since sedentarism is the most prevalent behavior, this study recommends that interventions be conducted at work and at academic environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 102352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000730/pdfft?md5=536c91ebabe3fec40b696a2fba3fea2e&pid=1-s2.0-S0213911123000730-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the prevalence of physical activity in the population aged ≥16 years integrating sedentarism and physical inactivity.

Method

A cross-sectional study using data from the Galician Risk Behavior Data System (n = 12,928) was conducted. The population was classified into four categories: physically active (active and non-sedentary), active but sedentary (active and sedentary), lightly active (inactive and non-sedentary), and extremely sedentary (inactive and sedentary). Prevalences were calculated for each category and a multinomial logistic regression model was fitted.

Results

58.0% of the population was physically active and the remaining 42.0% presented some degree of sedentarism and/or physical inactivity. Men were more likely to be extremely sedentary. The risk of sedentarism decreased with age, and workers and/or students were prone to a higher risk of extreme sedentarism in comparison to those who reported other status. Extremely sendentary behaviors were also more common in people with higher educational levels, individuals living alone, residents of urban environments, and smokers.

Conclusions

Joint evaluation of sedentarism and physical inactivity provides a more comprehensive and realistic picture of population behaviors related with physical activity. Since sedentarism is the most prevalent behavior, this study recommends that interventions be conducted at work and at academic environments.

从综合角度看久坐行为和缺乏运动
目的了解≥16岁人群的身体活动情况,包括久坐和缺乏身体活动。方法采用加利西亚风险行为数据系统(n = 12,928)的数据进行横断面研究。研究对象被分为四类:身体活跃(活跃和不久坐)、活跃但久坐(活跃和不久坐)、轻度活跃(不活跃和不久坐)和极度久坐(不活跃和不久坐)。结果58.0%的人有运动习惯,42.0%的人有一定程度的久坐和/或缺乏运动习惯。男性更有可能久坐不动。久坐不动的风险随着年龄的增长而降低,与其他身份的人相比,工人和/或学生患极端久坐不动的风险更高。极端久坐行为在教育程度较高的人群、独居者、城市居民和吸烟者中也更为常见。结论对久坐与缺乏运动的联合评价,可以更全面、更现实地了解与运动相关的人群行为。由于久坐不动是最普遍的行为,本研究建议在工作和学术环境中进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信