Connecting pathogen transmission and healthcare worker cognition: a cognitive task analysis of infection prevention and control practices during simulated patient care.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joel M Mumma, Bradley W Weaver, Jill S Morgan, Golpar Ghassemian, Paige R Gannon, Kylie B Burke, Brandon A Berryhill, Rebecca E MacKay, Lindsay Lee, Colleen S Kraft
{"title":"Connecting pathogen transmission and healthcare worker cognition: a cognitive task analysis of infection prevention and control practices during simulated patient care.","authors":"Joel M Mumma, Bradley W Weaver, Jill S Morgan, Golpar Ghassemian, Paige R Gannon, Kylie B Burke, Brandon A Berryhill, Rebecca E MacKay, Lindsay Lee, Colleen S Kraft","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relatively little is known about the cognitive processes of healthcare workers that mediate between performance-shaping factors (eg, workload, time pressure) and adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. We taxonomised the cognitive work involved in IPC practices and assessed its role in how pathogens spread.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two registered nurses performed patient care tasks in a standardised high-fidelity simulation. Afterwards, participants watched a video of their simulation and described what they were thinking, which we analysed to obtain frequencies of macrocognitive functions (MCFs) in the context of different IPC practices. Performance in the simulation was the frequency at which participants spread harmless surrogates for pathogens (bacteriophages). Using a tertiary split, participants were categorised into a performance group: high, medium or low. To identify associations between the three variables-performance groups, MCFs and IPC practices-we used multiblock discriminant correspondence analysis (MUDICA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MUDICA extracted two factors discriminating between performance groups. Factor 1 captured differences between high and medium performers. High performers monitored the situation for contamination events and mitigated risks by applying formal and informal rules or managing their uncertainty, particularly for sterile technique and cleaning. Medium performers engaged more in future-oriented cognition, anticipating contamination events and planning their workflow, across many IPC practices. Factor 2 distinguished the low performers from the medium and high performers who mitigated risks with informal rules and sacrificed IPC practices when managing tradeoffs, all in the context of minimising cross-contamination from physical touch.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To reduce pathogen transmission, new approaches to training IPC (eg, cognitive skills training) and system design are needed. Interventions should help nurses apply their knowledge of IPC fluidly during patient care, prioritising and monitoring situations for risks and deciding how to mitigate risks. Planning IPC into one's workflow is beneficial but may not account for the unpredictability of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Relatively little is known about the cognitive processes of healthcare workers that mediate between performance-shaping factors (eg, workload, time pressure) and adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. We taxonomised the cognitive work involved in IPC practices and assessed its role in how pathogens spread.

Methods: Forty-two registered nurses performed patient care tasks in a standardised high-fidelity simulation. Afterwards, participants watched a video of their simulation and described what they were thinking, which we analysed to obtain frequencies of macrocognitive functions (MCFs) in the context of different IPC practices. Performance in the simulation was the frequency at which participants spread harmless surrogates for pathogens (bacteriophages). Using a tertiary split, participants were categorised into a performance group: high, medium or low. To identify associations between the three variables-performance groups, MCFs and IPC practices-we used multiblock discriminant correspondence analysis (MUDICA).

Results: MUDICA extracted two factors discriminating between performance groups. Factor 1 captured differences between high and medium performers. High performers monitored the situation for contamination events and mitigated risks by applying formal and informal rules or managing their uncertainty, particularly for sterile technique and cleaning. Medium performers engaged more in future-oriented cognition, anticipating contamination events and planning their workflow, across many IPC practices. Factor 2 distinguished the low performers from the medium and high performers who mitigated risks with informal rules and sacrificed IPC practices when managing tradeoffs, all in the context of minimising cross-contamination from physical touch.

Conclusions: To reduce pathogen transmission, new approaches to training IPC (eg, cognitive skills training) and system design are needed. Interventions should help nurses apply their knowledge of IPC fluidly during patient care, prioritising and monitoring situations for risks and deciding how to mitigate risks. Planning IPC into one's workflow is beneficial but may not account for the unpredictability of patient care.

连接病原体传播和医护人员认知:模拟病人护理期间感染预防和控制实践的认知任务分析。
背景:对于卫生保健工作者在绩效塑造因素(如工作量、时间压力)和遵守感染预防和控制(IPC)做法之间的认知过程,人们知之甚少。我们对IPC实践中涉及的认知工作进行了分类,并评估了其在病原体传播中的作用。方法:42名注册护士在标准化高保真模拟中执行患者护理任务。之后,参与者观看了他们的模拟视频,并描述了他们的想法,我们分析了这些视频,以获得不同IPC实践背景下宏观认知功能(mcf)的频率。模拟中的表现是参与者传播病原体无害替代物(噬菌体)的频率。使用三级划分,参与者被划分为表现组:高、中、低。为了确定绩效组、mcf和IPC实践这三个变量之间的关联,我们使用了多块判别对应分析(MUDICA)。结果:MUDICA提取出两个性能组间的判别因子。因素1捕获了高绩效和中等绩效之间的差异。高绩效人员监测污染事件的情况,并通过应用正式和非正式规则或管理其不确定性来减轻风险,特别是在无菌技术和清洁方面。在许多IPC实践中,中等绩效者更多地参与面向未来的认知,预测污染事件并规划他们的工作流程。因素2区分了中高绩效者和低绩效者,后者通过非正式规则降低了风险,并在管理权衡时牺牲了IPC实践,所有这些都是在最小化身体接触交叉污染的背景下进行的。结论:为减少病原体传播,需要采用新的方法(如认知技能培训)和系统设计来培训IPC。干预措施应有助于护士在患者护理过程中流畅地运用IPC知识,优先考虑和监测风险情况,并决定如何减轻风险。将IPC规划到工作流程中是有益的,但可能无法解释患者护理的不可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信