The landscape of patellofemoral arthroplasty research: a bibliometric analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yao Yang, Yuan Chen, Yingjie Wang, Junjie Wang, Baoliang Lu, Wanbo Zhu, Ning Yang, Junchen Zhu, Chen Zhu, Xianzuo Zhang
{"title":"The landscape of patellofemoral arthroplasty research: a bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Yao Yang, Yuan Chen, Yingjie Wang, Junjie Wang, Baoliang Lu, Wanbo Zhu, Ning Yang, Junchen Zhu, Chen Zhu, Xianzuo Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s42836-023-00215-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) was shown to be a potentially effective surgical technique for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis but varying reports on PFA-related implant failure and complications have rendered the procedure controversial. This study aimed to identify impactful publications, research interests/efforts, and collaborative networks in the field of PFA research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database, Medline, Springer, BIOSIS Citation Index, and PubMed to retrieve relevant publications on PFA research published between 1950-2022. Statistical tests in R software were used for analysis while VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace were employed for data visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred forty-one articles were analyzed with the number of published papers increasing over time. Knee was the most frequent journal and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research was the most cited journal. Clinical outcomes, such as prosthesis survival, revision, and complications, were researched most frequently as demonstrated by keyword analysis. The United States was the top contributor to cooperative networks, followed by the United Kingdom while Technical University Munich formed close ties among authors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Publications on PFA research have witnessed a notable surge. They primarily came from a limited number of centers and were characterized by low-level evidence. The majority of studies primarily focused on the clinical outcomes of PFA, while revision of PFA and patient satisfaction have emerged as new research areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"5 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00215-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) was shown to be a potentially effective surgical technique for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis but varying reports on PFA-related implant failure and complications have rendered the procedure controversial. This study aimed to identify impactful publications, research interests/efforts, and collaborative networks in the field of PFA research.

Methods: The study used the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database, Medline, Springer, BIOSIS Citation Index, and PubMed to retrieve relevant publications on PFA research published between 1950-2022. Statistical tests in R software were used for analysis while VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace were employed for data visualization.

Results: Two hundred forty-one articles were analyzed with the number of published papers increasing over time. Knee was the most frequent journal and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research was the most cited journal. Clinical outcomes, such as prosthesis survival, revision, and complications, were researched most frequently as demonstrated by keyword analysis. The United States was the top contributor to cooperative networks, followed by the United Kingdom while Technical University Munich formed close ties among authors.

Conclusion: Publications on PFA research have witnessed a notable surge. They primarily came from a limited number of centers and were characterized by low-level evidence. The majority of studies primarily focused on the clinical outcomes of PFA, while revision of PFA and patient satisfaction have emerged as new research areas.

髌股关节成形术的研究概况:文献计量学分析。
目的:髌股关节置换术(PFA)被证明是治疗孤立性髌股骨关节炎的一种潜在有效的手术技术,但不同的PFA相关植入物失败和并发症的报道使得该手术存在争议。本研究旨在确定PFA研究领域中有影响力的出版物、研究兴趣/努力和合作网络。方法:利用Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC)数据库、Medline、Springer、BIOSIS引文索引和PubMed检索1950-2022年间发表的PFA相关文献。采用R软件中的统计检验进行分析,采用VOSviewer、Bibliometrix和CiteSpace进行数据可视化。结果:共分析了241篇论文,论文数量随时间的推移而增加。膝关节是被引用频率最高的期刊,临床骨科及相关研究是被引用频率最高的期刊。如关键词分析所示,临床结果,如假体存活、翻修和并发症,是研究最频繁的。美国是合作网络的最大贡献者,其次是英国,慕尼黑工业大学在作者之间建立了密切的联系。结论:关于PFA研究的出版物出现了显著的增长。它们主要来自数量有限的研究中心,证据水平低。大多数研究主要集中在PFA的临床结果上,而PFA的修订和患者满意度已成为新的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信