Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Fellows on Postresuscitation Debriefing.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2036
Nicole K Sather, Lauren E Zinns, Gillian Brennan, Lily Guo, Nadia Khan, Vinod Havalad
{"title":"Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Fellows on Postresuscitation Debriefing.","authors":"Nicole K Sather, Lauren E Zinns, Gillian Brennan, Lily Guo, Nadia Khan, Vinod Havalad","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Current guidelines recommend debriefing following medical resuscitations to improve patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to describe national trends in postresuscitation debriefing practices among pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows to identify potential gaps in fellow education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 13-item survey was distributed to fellows in all 76 ACGME-accredited PCCM programs in the United States in the spring of 2021. The online survey addressed frequency and timing of debriefings following medical resuscitations, whether formal training is provided, which medical professionals are present, and providers' comfort level leading a debriefing. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 responses (out of a possible N of 536) were gathered from current PCCM fellows. All fellows (100%) reported participation in a medical resuscitation. Only 21% stated that debriefings occurred after every resuscitation event, and 44% did not follow a structured protocol for debriefing. While 66% reported feeling very or somewhat comfortable leading the debriefing, 19% felt either somewhat uncomfortable or very uncomfortable. A vast majority (92%) of participating fellows believed that debriefing would be helpful in improving team member performance during future resuscitations, and 92% expressed interest in learning more about debriefing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of PCCM fellows do not receive formal training on how to lead a debriefing. Given that 74% of fellows in our study did not feel very comfortable leading a debriefing but almost universally expressed that this practice is useful for provider well-being and performance, there is a clear need for increased incorporation of debriefing training into PCCM curricula across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"10 4","pages":"247-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current guidelines recommend debriefing following medical resuscitations to improve patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to describe national trends in postresuscitation debriefing practices among pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellows to identify potential gaps in fellow education.

Methods: A 13-item survey was distributed to fellows in all 76 ACGME-accredited PCCM programs in the United States in the spring of 2021. The online survey addressed frequency and timing of debriefings following medical resuscitations, whether formal training is provided, which medical professionals are present, and providers' comfort level leading a debriefing. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 102 responses (out of a possible N of 536) were gathered from current PCCM fellows. All fellows (100%) reported participation in a medical resuscitation. Only 21% stated that debriefings occurred after every resuscitation event, and 44% did not follow a structured protocol for debriefing. While 66% reported feeling very or somewhat comfortable leading the debriefing, 19% felt either somewhat uncomfortable or very uncomfortable. A vast majority (92%) of participating fellows believed that debriefing would be helpful in improving team member performance during future resuscitations, and 92% expressed interest in learning more about debriefing.

Conclusions: The majority of PCCM fellows do not receive formal training on how to lead a debriefing. Given that 74% of fellows in our study did not feel very comfortable leading a debriefing but almost universally expressed that this practice is useful for provider well-being and performance, there is a clear need for increased incorporation of debriefing training into PCCM curricula across the United States.

儿科危重护理人员复苏后述职调查。
目的:目前的指南建议在医疗复苏后进行报告,以改善患者的预后。本研究的目的是描述全国儿童重症监护医学(PCCM)研究员复苏后汇报实践的趋势,以确定同行教育的潜在差距。方法:在2021年春季,对美国所有76个acgme认证的PCCM项目的研究员进行了一项13项调查。在线调查涉及医疗复苏后情况汇报的频率和时间,是否提供了正式培训,有哪些医疗专业人员在场,以及提供者在进行情况汇报时的舒适程度。结果采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:从目前的PCCM研究员中收集了102份回复(可能的N为536份)。所有研究员(100%)报告参与了一次医疗复苏。只有21%的人表示在每次复苏事件后都会进行情况汇报,44%的人没有遵循结构化的情况汇报协议。66%的人表示在主持汇报时感到非常或有些舒服,19%的人感到有些不舒服或非常不舒服。绝大多数(92%)的参与者认为,汇报将有助于提高团队成员在未来复苏中的表现,92%的人表示有兴趣了解更多关于汇报的知识。结论:大多数PCCM研究员没有接受过关于如何领导汇报的正式培训。考虑到在我们的研究中,74%的研究员对领导汇报感到不太舒服,但几乎普遍表示这种做法对提供者的福祉和绩效有用,显然有必要在美国各地的PCCM课程中增加汇报培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信