Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Pedro Dantas, Sergio R Gonçalves, André Grenho, Vasco Mascarenhas, Jorge Martins, Miguel Tavares da Silva, Sergio B Gonçalves, José Guimarães Consciência
{"title":"Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies.","authors":"Pedro Dantas, Sergio R Gonçalves, André Grenho, Vasco Mascarenhas, Jorge Martins, Miguel Tavares da Silva, Sergio B Gonçalves, José Guimarães Consciência","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.1212.BJR-2022-0461.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews for this literature search in three databases. After screening, 16 studies were included for the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies assessed different hip conditions like labrum status, the biomechanical effect of the cam, femoral version, acetabular coverage, and the effect of rim trimming. The testing and loading conditions were also quite diverse, and this disparity limits direct comparisons between the different researches. With normal anatomy the mean contact pressures ranged from 1.54 to 4.4 MPa, and the average peak contact pressures ranged from 2 to 9.3 MPa. Labral tear or resection showed an increase in contact pressures that diminished after repair or reconstruction of the labrum. Complete cam resection also decreased the contact pressure, and acetabular rim resection of 6 mm increased the contact pressure at the acetabular base.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To date there is no standardized methodology to access hip contact biomechanics in hip arthroscopy, or with the preservation of the periarticular soft-tissues. A tendency towards improved biomechanics (lower contact pressures) was seen with labral repair and reconstruction techniques as well as with cam correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1212.BJR-2022-0461.R2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters.

Methods: We used the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews for this literature search in three databases. After screening, 16 studies were included for the final analysis.

Results: The studies assessed different hip conditions like labrum status, the biomechanical effect of the cam, femoral version, acetabular coverage, and the effect of rim trimming. The testing and loading conditions were also quite diverse, and this disparity limits direct comparisons between the different researches. With normal anatomy the mean contact pressures ranged from 1.54 to 4.4 MPa, and the average peak contact pressures ranged from 2 to 9.3 MPa. Labral tear or resection showed an increase in contact pressures that diminished after repair or reconstruction of the labrum. Complete cam resection also decreased the contact pressure, and acetabular rim resection of 6 mm increased the contact pressure at the acetabular base.

Conclusion: To date there is no standardized methodology to access hip contact biomechanics in hip arthroscopy, or with the preservation of the periarticular soft-tissues. A tendency towards improved biomechanics (lower contact pressures) was seen with labral repair and reconstruction techniques as well as with cam correction.

髋关节接触压力和力:体内和尸体研究的范围综述。
目的:髋关节生物力学研究分析了不同髋关节状态、不同手术方式、不同加载和测试条件下股骨髋臼接触压力和力。本综述的目的是识别和总结文献中关于尸体和体内研究中髋关节接触压力和力的现有证据,以及关节负荷、唇部状态、股骨和髋臼形态如何影响这些生物力学参数。方法:我们使用PRISMA扩展对三个数据库的文献检索进行范围综述。筛选后,纳入16项研究进行最终分析。结果:研究评估了不同的髋关节状况,如唇形状态、凸轮的生物力学效应、股骨版本、髋臼覆盖率和边缘修剪的效果。试验和加载条件也存在较大差异,这种差异限制了不同研究之间的直接比较。正常解剖时,平均接触压力为1.54 ~ 4.4 MPa,平均峰值接触压力为2 ~ 9.3 MPa。唇部撕裂或切除显示接触压力增加,在唇部修复或重建后减少。完全凸轮切除也降低了接触压力,髋臼边缘切除6mm增加了髋臼底部的接触压力。结论:迄今为止,还没有标准化的方法来获取髋关节镜下髋关节接触生物力学,或保留关节周围软组织。通过唇部修复和重建技术以及凸轮矫正,可以看到改善生物力学(降低接触压力)的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信