How best to measure connection to a team: team identification, brand attitude/loyalty, consumer lifestyle or interest level?

Galen Trail, Hyejin Bang, Windy Dees
{"title":"How best to measure connection to a team: team identification, brand attitude/loyalty, consumer lifestyle or interest level?","authors":"Galen Trail, Hyejin Bang, Windy Dees","doi":"10.1108/ijsms-06-2023-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study was to compare four different consumer pathway models based on identity theory, attitude/loyalty theory, lifestyle theory and hierarchy of effects theory, each with associated instruments measuring connection to the team.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors did a two-study analysis, first collecting data from people aware of an NFL team (<em>N</em> = 218) and then an MLS team (<em>N</em> = 209) to determine which connection item performed better.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors found that the Consumer Pathway for Sport Fandom based on the hierarchy of effects theory and its associated interest measurement item performed better than the other three frameworks and items. The Interest item shared the most variance with games attended, games intending to attend, games watched via media and games intending to watch via media.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The Consumer Pathway for Sport Fandom represents the entire consumer spectrum from non-aware consumers all the way up to die-hard sports fans. This pathway will allow sport marketers to track their consumers from initial awareness of the product or service all the way through the brand relationship to ultimate loyalty.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501000,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsms-06-2023-0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare four different consumer pathway models based on identity theory, attitude/loyalty theory, lifestyle theory and hierarchy of effects theory, each with associated instruments measuring connection to the team.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors did a two-study analysis, first collecting data from people aware of an NFL team (N = 218) and then an MLS team (N = 209) to determine which connection item performed better.

Findings

The authors found that the Consumer Pathway for Sport Fandom based on the hierarchy of effects theory and its associated interest measurement item performed better than the other three frameworks and items. The Interest item shared the most variance with games attended, games intending to attend, games watched via media and games intending to watch via media.

Originality/value

The Consumer Pathway for Sport Fandom represents the entire consumer spectrum from non-aware consumers all the way up to die-hard sports fans. This pathway will allow sport marketers to track their consumers from initial awareness of the product or service all the way through the brand relationship to ultimate loyalty.

如何最好地衡量与团队的联系:团队认同、品牌态度/忠诚度、消费者的生活方式或兴趣水平?
本研究的目的是比较基于认同理论、态度/忠诚理论、生活方式理论和效应层次理论的四种不同的消费者路径模型,每种模型都有测量与团队联系的相关工具。设计/方法/方法作者进行了两项研究分析,首先从了解NFL球队(N = 218)的人那里收集数据,然后从了解MLS球队(N = 209)的人那里收集数据,以确定哪种连接项目表现更好。研究发现,基于效应层次理论的体育迷消费路径及其相关兴趣测量项目比其他三个框架和项目表现更好。兴趣项的差异最大的是参加比赛、打算参加比赛、通过媒体观看比赛和打算通过媒体观看比赛。《体育迷之路》代表了从不知情的消费者到铁杆体育迷的整个消费范围。这条路径将允许体育营销人员跟踪他们的消费者,从最初对产品或服务的认识一直到品牌关系,直到最终的忠诚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信