Checklist como herramienta para los padres ante la fiebre en el paciente pediátrico

Pub Date : 2023-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102134
A. Moreno Sánchez , D. Molina Herranz , J.M. Aroza Ruano , G. Carmen Marcén , B. Salinas Salvador , M.Á. Ordoñez Alonso
{"title":"Checklist como herramienta para los padres ante la fiebre en el paciente pediátrico","authors":"A. Moreno Sánchez ,&nbsp;D. Molina Herranz ,&nbsp;J.M. Aroza Ruano ,&nbsp;G. Carmen Marcén ,&nbsp;B. Salinas Salvador ,&nbsp;M.Á. Ordoñez Alonso","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In Western Europe, 20%-40% of children with fever request health care. Most of them present trivial viral infections, however, it is essential in pediatrics to distinguish patients who present a severe infection. This process begins with the recognition of the seriousness and the subsequent search for medical attention by the parents.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Analytical and cross-sectional observational study. One hundred patients were selected in two health centers. Sociodemographic data were collected, together with the responses to a checklist containing the signs and symptoms to request health care in case of fever. Subsequently, the checklist was filled out by the pediatrician.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of the patients was 5.41 years. 50% consulted in the first 48<!--> <!-->h of fever evolution. In 42%, the response to all the items on the checklist was exactly the same between the companion and the pediatrician. There were no significant differences according to variables: first episode of fever (<em>P</em>=.262), age of the patient (<em>P</em>=.859), having a sibling (<em>P</em>=.880), family relationship of the companion (<em>P</em>=.648) or educational level of the companion (<em>P</em>=.828).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Medical consultations for fever in pediatrics are carried out very early. A high percentage do not present alarm signs when they consult. There is a need to expand training on the alarm signs of fever in all parents, regardless of the number of children, age or educational level. The checklist as a tool for home assessment of fever has received high marks for its usefulness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359323002149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In Western Europe, 20%-40% of children with fever request health care. Most of them present trivial viral infections, however, it is essential in pediatrics to distinguish patients who present a severe infection. This process begins with the recognition of the seriousness and the subsequent search for medical attention by the parents.

Methodology

Analytical and cross-sectional observational study. One hundred patients were selected in two health centers. Sociodemographic data were collected, together with the responses to a checklist containing the signs and symptoms to request health care in case of fever. Subsequently, the checklist was filled out by the pediatrician.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 5.41 years. 50% consulted in the first 48 h of fever evolution. In 42%, the response to all the items on the checklist was exactly the same between the companion and the pediatrician. There were no significant differences according to variables: first episode of fever (P=.262), age of the patient (P=.859), having a sibling (P=.880), family relationship of the companion (P=.648) or educational level of the companion (P=.828).

Conclusions

Medical consultations for fever in pediatrics are carried out very early. A high percentage do not present alarm signs when they consult. There is a need to expand training on the alarm signs of fever in all parents, regardless of the number of children, age or educational level. The checklist as a tool for home assessment of fever has received high marks for its usefulness.

分享
查看原文
检查表作为家长面对儿科患者发烧的工具
在西欧,20%-40%的发烧儿童要求医疗保健。他们中的大多数表现为轻微的病毒感染,然而,在儿科区分出现严重感染的患者是至关重要的。这一过程首先是认识到问题的严重性,然后由父母寻求医疗照顾。方法:分析性和横断面观察性研究。在两个保健中心挑选了100名病人。收集了社会人口统计数据,以及对一份清单的答复,其中载有发烧时要求医疗保健的体征和症状。随后,儿科医生填写了检查表。结果患者平均年龄5.41岁。50%患者在发热前48小时就诊。在42%的情况下,陪伴者和儿科医生对检查表上所有项目的反应完全相同。首次发热(P=.262)、患者年龄(P=.859)、是否有兄弟姐妹(P=.880)、陪伴者的家庭关系(P=.648)、陪伴者的文化程度(P=.828)等变量差异无统计学意义。结论儿科发热应及早进行医学会诊。很高比例的人在咨询时没有出现报警信号。有必要扩大对所有家长的发热报警信号培训,无论孩子的数量、年龄或教育水平如何。检查表作为一种家庭评估发烧的工具,因其实用性而获得了很高的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信